Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spinbaby

(15,088 posts)
Thu May 17, 2018, 06:40 PM May 2018

Well, that was a dud

I had ordered seeds for the nicotiana perfume variety and carefully started them from seed. The description promised highly fragrant flowers. They bloomed in only two months from seed but have no fragrance at all. If I had bothered to read reviews from around the Internet instead of the seller’s description, I would have known that.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
1. Not to deepen the cut but nicotiana is extremely fragrant so total bum sale. I have had a couple
Thu May 17, 2018, 06:45 PM
May 2018

of plant related non producing items over the years . Always a bummer to waste care and money

spinbaby

(15,088 posts)
2. They're perfectly pretty flowers
Thu May 17, 2018, 07:01 PM
May 2018

But I like nicotiana for its fragrance. I used to grow the sylvestris variety at the last house and it would make you swoon with delight when it released its scent in the evening. It takes a lot more space, but I think I’ll go back to it.

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
3. Yes delightful . I just returned before posting from Lilacia park a short train ride from Chicago
Thu May 17, 2018, 07:29 PM
May 2018

On a breezy day when they open the train door at that stop across from the lilac filled park the scent this time of year comes wafting in to the car
It was a nice day, and a short ride out for a walk among some sweet sensations
81/2 acres of 200 varieties
http://www.lombardlilactime.com/history

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Gardening»Well, that was a dud