Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,423 posts)
Mon Nov 19, 2018, 11:26 AM Nov 2018

Gorsuch, joined by Sotomayor(!), writes that SCOTUS should've taken a Confrontation Clause case

Last edited Mon Nov 19, 2018, 12:24 PM - Edit history (1)

WhatCouldGoWrongHat Retweeted

Gorsuch, joined by Sotomayor(!), writes that SCOTUS should’ve taken a Confrontation Clause case and affirmed defendants’ right to cross-examine forensic analysts at trial. (I think he’s absolutely correct.) https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/111918zor_q86b.pdf



Scalia was the court’s Confrontation Clause champion, and it appears Gorsuch is eager to continue his legacy. Good for him.



SCOTUSblog Retweeted

#SCOTUS denies review in Stuart v Alabama, involving introduction of blood-alcohol testing w/out testimony from analyst who performed test. Gorsuch dissented from denial, joined by Sotomayor.



The running tally is:

DUers, opposed to cross-examination (Betsy DeVos wants to let accused sex abusers cross examine their victims);

Gorsuch, in favor of cross-examination.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gorsuch, joined by Sotomayor(!), writes that SCOTUS should've taken a Confrontation Clause case (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2018 OP
Like a lot of CO conservatives, Gorsuch has strong Libertarian underpinnings... hlthe2b Nov 2018 #1
The only thing Scalia was good on was 4th amendment stuff qazplm135 Nov 2018 #2
Scalia was a junkyard dog on 1A. mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2018 #3

hlthe2b

(102,234 posts)
1. Like a lot of CO conservatives, Gorsuch has strong Libertarian underpinnings...
Mon Nov 19, 2018, 11:33 AM
Nov 2018

Unfortunately, his Corporatist ties are equally strong, so we can expect a lot of seeming paradoxical votes from him, I think.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,423 posts)
3. Scalia was a junkyard dog on 1A.
Mon Nov 19, 2018, 11:37 AM
Nov 2018
Texas v. Johnson

Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states. Justice William Brennan wrote for a five-justice majority in holding that the defendant Gregory Lee Johnson's act of flag burning was protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Johnson was represented by attorneys David D. Cole and William Kunstler.
....

The Supreme Court's decision

The opinion of the Court came down as a controversial 5–4 decision, with the majority opinion delivered by William J. Brennan, Jr. and Justices Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Antonin Scalia, and Anthony Kennedy joining Brennan, with Kennedy also writing a concurrence.
....
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Gorsuch, joined by Sotoma...