Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumHow the NRA is winning
Article from the WaPo.
Easy and likely incorrect.
Theres little doubt that the inside-the-Beltway crowd and those who have been longtime advocates of more gun control laws are outraged by the brash style that the NRA has adopted following the shootings in Newtown, Conn.
But, theres also plenty of evidence to suggest that the NRA is regarded entirely differently in the country at large. Polling conducted by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal this week showed 41 percent of people had a favorable opinion of the NRA, while 34 percent viewed it unfavorably, a margin largely unchanged from a similar survey conducted in January 2011.
And a look at the longer-term trend line on views of the NRA by Gallup suggests a striking consistency in the overall impression Americans have of the gun rights group.
More at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/18/how-the-nra-is-winning/
Scuba
(53,475 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)instead of the next one, they already are. I caught a clip on BBC, talking about UK massacres and the resulting gun laws. One point a retired MPD inspector named Collen Greenwood made is that the laws were passed to deal with the last one, but nothing was done to prevent the next one until it happened.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Instead of adding noise, why don't you offer something we can do to stop the gun violence.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)since I got it from the BBC, but it is possible Greenwood is a member NRA-UK. I actually have offered suggestions which have to do with the root causes of all violence. It seems that too many are too concerned simple answers and culture wars.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)And the US media is a tool of the right. C'mon man, this isn't that hard.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)and they were talking about mass murders specifically in the UK. It was a round-table of talking heads talking about it from different angles.
While the US MSM perceived by both sides as having a liberal or conservative bias, is often corporate or cosmopolitan bias, which is why it is anti OWS and anti gun. Fox on the other hand, is a horse of a whole different color.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)http://articles.latimes.com/2012/dec/19/news/la-pn-sen-boxer-national-guard-schools-20121219
Sen. Boxer proposes deploying National Guard at schools
December 19, 2012|By Richard Simon
Share
Sen. Barbara Boxer presents legislation to strengthen school safety on (Michael Reynolds / EPA )
WASHINGTON Federal funds would be made available to deploy National Guard troops at schools under legislation introduced Wednesday by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) in response to last weeks mass slaying at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn.
The Save Our Schools Act would leave it to governors to decide whether to call out the National Guard and how to use troops around schools.
____________
I suppose by your reckoning that is a Point on Steroids, so it may not qualify for rejection. But don't worry, you don't hear much about it from MSM anymore (maybe they were unaware of the conjured-up narrative of the controllers: If it ain't about bans, it's an "NRA Talking Point."
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Apologists are effective purveyors of propaganda.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)rightsideout
(978 posts)I get the Post delivered everyday and the gun control coverage is fair. Today there are two editorial pages that are pro gun-control. And there was a pro-control cartoon from Toles today.
Today's Editorial from the Editor of the Washington Post agrees with Obama's Executive Orders on gun control. It was either today or yesterday.
I'd say the Post favors more gun control than favors the NRA by a pretty wide margin. But they also acknowledge it will be tough getting gun control particularly magazine sizes and assault weapon bans passed through Congress.
The post Op-Eds cover both sides so you'll see some pro-gun advocates editorials in the Post. Although it doesn't reflect their overall views on the issue.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)when compared with it's agitprop days supporting gun bans. Perhaps they realize that covering all sides in this debate is not only ethical but, given the declining fortunes of MSM, good business.
The NYT, on the other hand...
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Similar poll results were had by CBS.
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)I was explaining the poll results.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)sucks? Or just that they suck at it?
Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Starboard Tack
(11,181 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)The numbers from CBS, IIRC, have a sizeable bloc of undecided/no opinion respondents. These people are grossly out of touch for all that propaganda.
CalFresh
(99 posts)at $25.00 each is over 6 million dollars. Gun shops selling out of guns and ammo. Gun makers running 24/7. In the short term President Obama is the NRA best friend. If I was GM I wish he would put a end to the SUV.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)How many names are on the Obama for America mailing list?
louis-t
(23,292 posts)They're selling a TON of guns right now. If screaming like a bunch of loons is what it takes, they will continue.
Pullo
(594 posts)The NRA has always had a flair for provocation, its nothing new really. Back in the mid 90's LaPierre was out calling ATF agents "jack-booted thugs" like those of Nazi Germany. This was just before the 1995 OKC bombing, LaPierre's statements caused a huge stir back then. Their post-Newtown press conference many were so appalled by was just business as usual for the group. Anyone who's paid any attention to the NRA over the last few decades should have expected nothing less than they got.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)We see it here on DU, but the NRA will school you. There is also some morale boosting going on, here.
Curiously, the WaPo article touches on another NRA characteristic: below the surface, they are slightly more moderate than other "gun rights" groups. And they have to keep that below the surface. In the future, the fledgling Firearms Policy Coalition might shift the pro-2A dynamic. Wouldn't it be flabbergasting if the considerable numbers of left-leaning gun owners could be brought to bear? They aren't now.
Pullo
(594 posts)Gun Owners of America and the Second Amendment Foundation ^
The NRA tried to derail the Heller case at several points. Robert Levy of the Cato Institute marshaled an effort to get a 2nd A case in front Supreme Court. It was only after Cato outmaneuvered the NRA and succeeded getting a case heard that the NRA endorsed the plaintiffs' case. More recently, the McDonald case was championed by the SAF, with the NRA running to the front of the parade very late in the game to appear like they were running the show.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Anyone can make a web page look nice.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)instead of ranting and saying stupid shit that does the cause more harm than good. There have been times I have wondered if Wayne and Ted aren't Brady moles. Since Ted represents the archery industry, gun bans would be good or their industry because of more demand for bow hunting.
Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)SAF for example. CalGuns is just in California. Many are, and the NRA is to a degree, or at least does just enough to make it look like it. They endorsed Strickland over Kaisach, but I doubt they did as much for him as they would any Republican. To be perfectly honest, I think the NRA fucks over pro gun Dems because the NRA board of directors is a collection on neocons that care more about other issues that are near and dear to neocon hearts. Granted the NRA does have some extremists like Neal Knox that actually wants to repeal NFA, which is too extreme even for me. Granted, I think NFA should be reformed so that a single shot rifle with a fifteen inch barrel isn't regulated the same as a machine gun, but I support the current regulations on Machine guns minus the Hughes Amendment.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)issue.
Pullo
(594 posts)Kasich voted for the '94 AWB so that(and a couple other things) dinged his standing with the NRA.
I agree you with about the NFA on all points. Knox and his Firearms Coalition take/took a very fundamentalist approach to gun to RKBA advocacy. Their philosophy IMO was to take the most extreme position possible and give moderates the room take a pragmatic position that moves the needle in favor of gun rights, but seems more mainstream. Knox himself was a big part of the Cincinnati Revolt when the hardliners mutinied against their leadership and seized control of the NRA. I'll admit I'm glad they did, because the NRA leadership was ready to basically abdicate their advocacy of the RKBA. I don't think there would be much left of the 2nd Amendment had the organization taken that path.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)http://www.firearmspolicy.org/
These are major groups in the pro-2A camp. And evidently a little tired of the NRA.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I think it is fine to advocate and defend the right to have guns. I think the NRA is no longer an honest party to this discussion. The NRA is an arm of the GOP.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)They are working actively to defeat pro-2A Democrats in the primaries, esp. in states where ANY Democrat has a hard chance getting elected. There is a posting about their activities in this group.
virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)Has given far more money to Democrats than the various gun control groups could even DREAM about??
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)They are an arm of the GOP.