Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumWhen Martin Luther King gave up his guns
In his 2011 book Gunfight, UCLA law professor Adam Winkler notes that, after King's house was bombed in 1956, the clergyman applied in Alabama for a concealed carry permit. Local police, loathe to grant such permits to African-Americans, deemed him "unsuitable" and denied his application.
The lesson from this incident is not, as some NRA members have tried to suggest in recent years, that King should be remembered as a gun-toting Republican. (Among many other problems, this portrayal neglects to acknowledge how Republicans used conservative anger about Civil Rights advances to win over the Dixiecrat South to their side of the aisle). Rather, the fact that King would request license to wear a gun in 1956, just as he was being catapulted onto the national stage, illustrates the profundity of the transformation that he underwent over the course of his public career.
While this transformation involved a conversion to moral nonviolence and personal pacifism, that is not the whole story. King's evolution also involved a hesitant but ultimately forceful embrace of direct action broad-scale, confrontational and unarmed. That stance had lasting consequences in the struggle for freedom in America.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/martin-luther-king-guns-pacifism
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Similarly, John R. Salter, one of the organizers of the famous 1963 sit-ins against segregated lunch counters in Jackson, Mississippi, said he always traveled armed while working as a civil rights organizer in the South.
I'm alive today because of the Second Amendment and the natural right to keep and bear arms, Salter said.
http://reason.com/blog/2011/01/19/martin-luther-king-civil-right
Sadly, things have not changed enough since MLK's days of needing an armed contingent.
And, even if they had, the reasons that the citizenry should have reasonable access to firearms is timeless, as the authors of the bill of rights plainly understood.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Excellent point.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)I seriously doubt it. Nonviolence and nonviolent resistance to achieve a goal does not equal not being willing to defend your home or your person if the death squads came to your door. He was not the first or only supporter of nonviolence to have armed guards or be armed himself. John Salter carried while organizing the 1963 lunch counter sit ins and other civil rights work around the South. Dr. TRM Howard, founder of the Regional Council of Negro Leadership, kept a Thompson submachine gun (don't know if it was registered) with him and arraigned armed escort to Emmett Till's mother during the trial. Rosa Parks was a gun owner, and might have carried.
aikoaiko
(34,163 posts)Does it? I think it says he didn't bring them to organized protest.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)MLK gave up his CC arms because those around him didn't. Both he and Gandhi went to some lengths to explain the duty to defend your home and family, and not to confuse this duty with either non-violent strategies or vulgar forms of non-aggressive inaction. Gandhi termed the latter "cowardice."