Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 05:09 PM Jan 2014

Gun nuts target one of their own

Here is what he said: “…all constitutional rights are regulated, always have been, and need to be.”

It would seem to be a self-evident truth. After all, your First Amendment right to freedom of speech is regulated. If you don’t believe it, write something libelous about a guy with deep pockets and man-eating lawyers. Your Fourth Amendment right to freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures is regulated and then some. If you don’t believe that, pick up your phone and ask the NSA agent tapping your line.

Unfortunately for him, Dick Metcalf, who made the aforementioned observation, was not referring to the First Amendment or the Fourth. No, he was talking about the Second. He’s been out of work ever since.

We are indebted to New York Times reporter Ravi Somaiya for bringing this story to light. Metcalf, who lives in Barry, Ill., is not a gun hater. To the contrary we are told that he is -- or was, at any rate -- one of the most prominent gun journalists in the country, a self-described “Second Amendment fundamentalist” who, at 67, has devoted most of his adult life to gun rights. He hosted a TV program about guns. Gun makers flew him around the world and sent him their products for review. And he had a regular column in Guns & Ammo magazine.

http://www.statesmanjournal.com/article/20140121/OPINION/301210008/Gun-nuts-target-one-their-own
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gun nuts target one of their own (Original Post) SecularMotion Jan 2014 OP
Dup Jenoch Jan 2014 #1
SecMo is hurting for material. aikoaiko Jan 2014 #6
and of course... shedevil69taz Jan 2014 #2
Sounds reasonable to me Packerowner740 Jan 2014 #3
Me, too. Eleanors38 Jan 2014 #4
straying from orthodoxy usually brings this result. gejohnston Jan 2014 #5

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
5. straying from orthodoxy usually brings this result.
Sun Jan 26, 2014, 03:31 PM
Jan 2014

I'm betting if a well known gun control advocate said, "I support a shall issue national handgun licensing and registration, and that permit would also allow legal concealed carry like the Czech Republic does." would receive the same treatment from their community.
He could have used better examples of BoR limits. Gun regulations are open actions of the State, which can't be compared with civil actions by Scrooge McDuck, or clandestine, and possibly illegal, operations by the NSA. Better examples would be Sedition Act of 1918, greeting your cousin Jack on an airliner, Terry stops, and DUI check points.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Gun nuts target one of th...