Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
Tue May 27, 2014, 11:26 AM May 2014

Technical question on guns (making them easier to track)

There's the SmartGun, which only the owner can fire. This made me think of the movie "Judge Dredd", where Dredd is convicted because the shells found in a murder-victim had marks that allowed them to be tracked down to a specific gun: His service side-arm.

I know that bullets are deformed when hitting a hard surface, but I don't think that's true when hitting flesh or wood or a thin metal-sheet.
Would it be possible to have a gun mark a bullet when it's fired?
For example, would it work if the firing-pin had an individual pattern (Morse or Braille or binary or whatever) on its tip, which would then get imprinted into the bullet when its fired?

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Technical question on guns (making them easier to track) (Original Post) DetlefK May 2014 OP
Yes, this is called microstamping discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2014 #1
I see. The problem is that it marks the shell, not the bullet. DetlefK May 2014 #2
Here is how microstamping would work, if it worked. Jenoch May 2014 #3
And altering the firing pin or even making a new one isn't that hard Lurks Often May 2014 #4
Separate idea Leme May 2014 #5
Monitoring like that... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2014 #6
government monitors your house Leme May 2014 #7
and this chip would serve what purpose and gejohnston May 2014 #8
Since they're good at that stuff... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2014 #10
purpose ? Leme May 2014 #14
Who would have the ability to locate it? Jenoch May 2014 #19
not arguing with you Leme May 2014 #22
I don't own an airplane. Jenoch May 2014 #24
guns are not mentioned either Leme May 2014 #25
Ok, I don't wish my arms to be implanted with GPS capabilitity. Jenoch May 2014 #27
One of the issues regarding GPS chips blueridge3210 May 2014 #29
Really? discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2014 #9
really Leme May 2014 #15
Just an aside discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2014 #21
Two immediate issues krispos42 May 2014 #11
it's just an idea Leme May 2014 #16
I can turn the cell phone one off to gejohnston May 2014 #18
expectaion of privacy? Leme May 2014 #23
The fastest and easiest way to reduce violence... krispos42 May 2014 #20
how would you power it? Duckhunter935 May 2014 #13
it's just an idea Leme May 2014 #17
Would it be possible to have a gun mark a bullet when it's fired? - Sure SkatmanRoth May 2014 #12
I was thinking more in the line of a serial-number/fingerprint. DetlefK May 2014 #26
I seriously doubt it gejohnston May 2014 #28
Only in the comic books kudzu22 May 2014 #30

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
1. Yes, this is called microstamping
Tue May 27, 2014, 11:42 AM
May 2014
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm_microstamping#Controversy

This applies to the spent shells ejected when the gun is fired.
"Wheel" guns (revolvers) don't eject shells, so this technology is of no help there.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
2. I see. The problem is that it marks the shell, not the bullet.
Tue May 27, 2014, 12:11 PM
May 2014

And as the bullet is encased, it would not be possible to personalize it.

Tricky.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
3. Here is how microstamping would work, if it worked.
Tue May 27, 2014, 12:55 PM
May 2014

It is already possible to determine if a bullet was shot by a particular gun if the bullet is not disintegrated. The problem is, the gun needs to be in possession of LEO to do it. A bullet from say, a crime scene, is compared to a bullet fired from the suspected gun used in that crime. The grooves on the bullets (from the grooves in the barrel) are compared to each other. If the gun has the microstamp features, and is registered with the state government, the spent shell casing would point to the last registered owner of that gun. This is all theory however.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
4. And altering the firing pin or even making a new one isn't that hard
Tue May 27, 2014, 01:05 PM
May 2014

A couple of swipes with a file would be enough to remove the micro-stamping and any decent machinist with a lathe can make a new firing pin.

That doesn't include someone going to a public range, grabbing a handful of empty cases and leaving those at a crime scene.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
6. Monitoring like that...
Tue May 27, 2014, 01:12 PM
May 2014

...requires a warrant:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
7. government monitors your house
Tue May 27, 2014, 01:21 PM
May 2014

they do not need a warrant for building inspectors. And no one would be searching the effects..just knowing the location. They know the location of your house.
also
They could have the chips only activate if not at home perhaps.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
19. Who would have the ability to locate it?
Tue May 27, 2014, 09:38 PM
May 2014

The government needs a court order or permission to track a cell phone. I don't think the government has access to On Star or LoJack without permission either.

I don't really wish to have to recharge the battery or to replace lithium batteries in any of the guns I own.

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
24. I don't own an airplane.
Wed May 28, 2014, 12:52 AM
May 2014

Airplanes are not mentioned in the constitution.

I'll pass on the registration and GPS of guns in America.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
25. guns are not mentioned either
Wed May 28, 2014, 02:17 AM
May 2014

o well, you didn't really want to have a discussion on whether gps could be put on guns

 

blueridge3210

(1,401 posts)
29. One of the issues regarding GPS chips
Wed May 28, 2014, 08:19 PM
May 2014

would be power supply. If a firearm were developed that required an on board power supply to function (laser, plasma?) that could be used to power the chip. Currently all commercially firearms are mechanical in nature and the energy to propel the round is self contained in such.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
9. Really?
Tue May 27, 2014, 01:33 PM
May 2014
government monitors your house
Baloney!


they do not need a warrant for building inspectors.
Please provide evidence that building inspectors can enter and inspect any building for any reason as they see fit.


...no one would be searching the effects...
In this sense your "effects" include your possessions. If you "possess" a firearm, it's one of your "effects". Knowing its location, especially if it's being carried, is the same a personal individual surveillance.


They could have the chips only activate if not at home perhaps.
Would they come with an ugly watch that you have to wear at home but aren't allowed to wear in public?

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
15. really
Tue May 27, 2014, 09:11 PM
May 2014

how many pictures of your house do you think the government has in its files ? Aerial almost for sure.

I did not say they can enter for no reason. I said they do not need a warrant. I should have said they may enter without a warrant.. as can health officials and such. Unless you are just arguing this... google this: can building inspector enter your house

knowing where something is or is not ... does not necessarily equate as unreasonable search or seizure

I do not know what they would come up with.. this is just an idea

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
21. Just an aside
Tue May 27, 2014, 11:57 PM
May 2014

I don't answer the phone for numbers I don't recognize nor do I open the door for people I don't recognize. Apparently my town sent an inspector/assessor/official of some type out for some reason to do with property taxes. I didn't hear them knock, just found a paper in my door. The message was to call for an appointment. I called; they asked when I'd like for an appointment and I said that I'm choosing to opt out and never. They were good with that. Should I choose to challenge any changes to my taxes or whatever I'll probably need to pay a lawyer but if it's not worth paying a lawyer, it's not enough to be bothered about.

Most of life including your dealings with the government and your dealings in situations of self-defense shows that cool heads and thoughts serves your best.

To enter your home against your wishes they need to actually go and get that warrant. If they've announced that intention, it would be in your interest to retain a lawyer to examine what they bring and to represent your own interests.

People have been quick to release their rights and sacrifice privacy and freedom. The NSA collects "metadata". They claim that they don't actually listen to every call but they record your number the number you call/called you and the date and time... It's also an invasion of privacy. The Obama Whitehouse agreed and ordered it stopped.

Does the government have pictures of my house? I hope so, I bought four years ago and they issued a CoO to my seller.
Anyone who has access to google, bing, mapquest, terraserver... has satellite and bird's-eye pictures of my house.

Let's put a chip in all the people so we can know where they are all the time, too. If anyone of them remains very still for too long, law enforcement can be sent automatically be sent to check their welfare. That would be great. One better... lets make sure we can ID any people who've actually died. Now we can't use the chip to ID them since that's only to know where they are so we need something that only works when you're close enough to see the person. How about we tattoo an ID number on their forearm? Sound good?

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
11. Two immediate issues
Tue May 27, 2014, 02:57 PM
May 2014

One, how does the gun report its location? What powers the transceiver?

Two, about 2 seconds in a microwave oven will roast all the electronics in a gun without harming the gun itself.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
16. it's just an idea
Tue May 27, 2014, 09:15 PM
May 2014

they put them in cell phones... at some point I am sure this could be resolved

i am sure there are workarounds...people file serial off crime guns... people do all sorts of illegal things with gun right now

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
18. I can turn the cell phone one off to
Tue May 27, 2014, 09:38 PM
May 2014

mine is set to only activate if I dial 911. There is also expectation of privacy. Aerial photos of your house isn't because it is open view with anyone in an airplane, just like there isn't one on a 2 way radio (or non encrypted cordless phones or analog phones 20 years ago, ask Newt Gingrich when his conversation was picked up by a some guy with a scanner. I worked with a guy that had the dirt on his neighbors because his police scanner would pick up cordless phone frequencies). Corded phones, and digital cell phones, do have the expectation of privacy.

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
23. expectaion of privacy?
Wed May 28, 2014, 12:27 AM
May 2014

Privacy? you still have that? I think that fallacy left around 2003 or earlier, proved recently.

as for the house having aerial photos.. I was just responding to someone who said that was baloney. Reply # 9

"government monitors your house
Baloney! "

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
20. The fastest and easiest way to reduce violence...
Tue May 27, 2014, 11:32 PM
May 2014

...including gun violence, is to address the underlying social and economic causes. This would both lower the crime rate AND improve the standard of living of the country.

The giant drop in crime that occurred in the area of 1990 was due to three major social and enviromental changes... hormonal birth control becoming widespread, the removal of lead additives from gasoline, and the legalization of abortion. It had nothing to do with more police or more jails or more gun laws; it was sharply reducing the pool of children born into circumstances associated with career criminality. And about 20 years later after these changes were made.... the crime rate dropped as career criminals became middle-aged and were not replaced by new teenagers.

So, if we progress with our liberal agenda in other areas, we will more quickly and more effectively lower crime while getting better democracy, better education, better pay and benefits, and a healthier economy.

Or, we can treat this like a hardware problem, spend decades fighting an ineffective War on Guns, and continue to have Republicans winning elections and continuing their War on the Middle Class, Science, Women, Democracy, Elections, etc.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
13. how would you power it?
Tue May 27, 2014, 08:10 PM
May 2014

what happens if the battery is dead, how would it be tracked then?
would it be required on the 300 million weapons all ready in use?

 

Leme

(1,092 posts)
17. it's just an idea
Tue May 27, 2014, 09:17 PM
May 2014

I do not have the technical answers, perhaps the technology needs to be developed.
-
existing guns, an open question

SkatmanRoth

(843 posts)
12. Would it be possible to have a gun mark a bullet when it's fired? - Sure
Tue May 27, 2014, 05:43 PM
May 2014

It is called the rifling which is imprinted into the projectile as it traverses the barrel. It has been use by law enforcement for over a hundred years to match recovered bullets with the gun that fired them. Investigators need to have the gun that fired the bullet to make a match that can be used as evidence.

However, it does not work with shotguns or sabot rounds.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
26. I was thinking more in the line of a serial-number/fingerprint.
Wed May 28, 2014, 04:49 AM
May 2014

If you find a bullet, you can look at it and look up in a register which registered gun produces these marks.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
28. I seriously doubt it
Wed May 28, 2014, 09:00 AM
May 2014

closer to no.
Even if it was registered, which is slim to none, it is likely to come up in NCIC as reported stolen about a decade ago. The closest thing to that are states that collect the casings of semi autos for possible comparisons at crime scenes. New York abandoned theirs a few years ago. They didn't abandon it because of the gun lobby, but because it was costing them money to maintain and never provided evidence to solve a crime. That shouldn't surprise anyone, since the collection only came from new pistols legally purchased in New York.

kudzu22

(1,273 posts)
30. Only in the comic books
Fri May 30, 2014, 08:23 PM
May 2014

I can't think of any way an ID mark could be imprinted on a bullet as it's fired using existing or almost-existing technology. There has been a suggestion to have all bullets imprinted as they are manufactured, but tracking it back to an individual would be a monumental task. Besides, people can and do make their own bullets.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Technical question on gun...