Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
Fri Dec 12, 2014, 04:25 PM Dec 2014

"Guilt by association" within the topics covered by this group.

Since it appears to be the order of the day, I think its a good topic to discuss.



IMO, it is an example of "gun politics" on a locale scale. My question is this where do the following fit in this discussion:



Leeland Yee, the gun control politician caught trafficking guns

Barbara Lipscomb, the million mom marcher who shot and paralyzed unarmed black man kikko smith

Hector "Big Weasel" Marroquin , The founder of an anti-gang group called No Guns, arrested for felony firearm possession

David Gregory, who flouted the magazine law in DC on camera, and was never charged

Annette Stevens president of Springfield, Illinois chapter of the Million Mom March, arrested for possession of an illegal gun that had its serial number ground off, and drugs. She plead guilty on the drug charges in exchange for dropping the gun charges

And (very) numerous convicted criminal "mayors against illegal guns"


Do they get to be a part of the discussion too, or are such things applicable only when the club can be used to beat gun rights supporters with?






26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Guilt by association" within the topics covered by this group. (Original Post) beevul Dec 2014 OP
You get to say any thing you want. The amendment upaloopa Dec 2014 #1
I don't burn incense. beevul Dec 2014 #2
It is a figure of speech upaloopa Dec 2014 #3
Have you destroyed your guns yet? oneshooter Dec 2014 #9
I took it out yesterday upaloopa Dec 2014 #10
What kind of .22 is it? Straw Man Dec 2014 #11
Ruger new model single six .22 LR and .22 magnum upaloopa Dec 2014 #12
Nice. Fixed or adjustable sights? Straw Man Dec 2014 #13
Adjustable upaloopa Dec 2014 #16
That's nice. oneshooter Dec 2014 #18
I sold it today to a gun dealer in upaloopa Dec 2014 #20
So you want fewer gun owners,yet declined to destroy yours to prevent oneshooter Dec 2014 #21
Well I don't get my sense of self from you upaloopa Dec 2014 #22
"spence" oneshooter Dec 2014 #23
i-phone auto correct upaloopa Dec 2014 #24
Thats gonna leave a mark. N/T beevul Dec 2014 #25
I like Grover Beach. Isn't the Kon Tiki and Steamers nearby? NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #26
It's the little people that need controlled. ileus Dec 2014 #4
But... sarisataka Dec 2014 #5
LOL...That is awesome! NaturalHigh Dec 2014 #6
Well, you know, that's different. NaturalHigh Dec 2014 #7
Not sure what you are trying to ask here. ManiacJoe Dec 2014 #8
The bushel basket posting, sans comment, of shootings Eleanors38 Dec 2014 #14
That explanation makes sense. ManiacJoe Dec 2014 #17
A Texas OC activist offing husband & daughter... Eleanors38 Dec 2014 #19
Carl Rowan VScott Dec 2014 #15
 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
2. I don't burn incense.
Fri Dec 12, 2014, 04:36 PM
Dec 2014

And if I did, I definitely wouldn't be looking for any made out of parchment, unlike some of your colleagues.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
10. I took it out yesterday
Fri Dec 12, 2014, 06:54 PM
Dec 2014

Gave it a good cleaning and oiled it and thought how much fun it would be to go target shooting after all I have a whole unused brick if .22 LRs.
I am such a fucking hypocrite right?

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
18. That's nice.
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 08:18 PM
Dec 2014

Too bad you have to destroy it.

That way it lessens gun ownership.

And to you, that is only right and moral.

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
21. So you want fewer gun owners,yet declined to destroy yours to prevent
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 12:54 AM
Dec 2014

it being used by another.

Hypocrisy, that is your name.

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
23. "spence"
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 01:32 PM
Dec 2014


So you admit that you will sell your convictions for money.

And you call yourself a "progressive".
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
26. I like Grover Beach. Isn't the Kon Tiki and Steamers nearby?
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 12:33 AM
Dec 2014

I love the Kon Tiki, it's very unlike any other hotel property on the coast.

Really has a nostalgic feel and the view is like Kaanapali.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
4. It's the little people that need controlled.
Fri Dec 12, 2014, 04:52 PM
Dec 2014

The 1%ers will always be above the law and afford protection.



NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
7. Well, you know, that's different.
Fri Dec 12, 2014, 05:22 PM
Dec 2014

I mean, come on now, these people are special. They are the ones trying to give us poor little people gun control.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
8. Not sure what you are trying to ask here.
Fri Dec 12, 2014, 05:33 PM
Dec 2014

If you want to start a discussion on any of your example gun crime stories, feel free to do so.

The key part would be to actually start a discussion. Drive-by postings of "news" are frowned upon as we can get the news anywhere.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
14. The bushel basket posting, sans comment, of shootings
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 02:13 PM
Dec 2014

with an aim to associating gun-owners with the tragic consequences of those shootings has become sturm und drang with controller/banners. The OP seems tired of this low-rent crap, and is merely pointing out that those who publicly decry gun violence sometimes engage in it themselves in spectacularly hypocritical and bloody fashion. Hence, the controller outlook is morally underminded, rather starkly considering its elitistism.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
19. A Texas OC activist offing husband & daughter...
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 09:29 PM
Dec 2014

is no worse, better, or socially more meaningful than a Million Mom, armed all along, opening up on someone in the name of revenge. One fulfills a stereotype; the other creates one.

 

VScott

(774 posts)
15. Carl Rowan
Sat Dec 13, 2014, 03:06 PM
Dec 2014
Shooting controversy

Rowan gained public notoriety on June 14, 1988, when he shot an unarmed teenage trespasser, Neil Smith, who was on his property illegally. "The interloper was a near-naked teenager who had been skinny-dipping with friends in Rowan's pool, and the columnist's weapon was an unregistered, and thus illegal, .22 caliber pistol."[5]

From People Magazine: "When Rowan heard the police arrive, he stepped outside to let them in. It was then, he says, that he was confronted by "a tall man who was smoking something that I absolutely was sure was marijuana." Rowan says he repeatedly warned the intruder that he was armed and would shoot. "My first words were: 'Freeze! Stay where you are!' " says Rowan. "Then I said, 'I have a gun.' " Rowan says the man kept coming and that he finally felt forced to shoot in self-defense. He says he aimed at the intruder's feet but hit him in the wrist when the man lunged forward.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Rowan#Shooting_controversy
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»"Guilt by associatio...