How To Reduce Gun-Related Deaths In America By Over 80%

[SecularMotion]

In just one week following that attack, 6 more people were killed and 35 more people were injured over the course of nine more mass shootings across America. In the early Democratic debates, the issue of gun control was front and center after the San Bernardino attack in December and the massacre at the Mother Emanuel Church in Charleston in June.

On the other side of the aisle though, the Republicans refused to admit that any gun control laws would have changed anything. They generally refuse to talk about gun control, and they continue to argue that the best way to reduce gun deaths in America, is to have everyone own more guns! And aside from pointing out the general absurdity of trying to reduce gun deaths by arming more people, it's been very difficult to prove that gun control is effective. Perhaps more importantly, it's also been very difficult to figure out which gun control laws are actually effective in curbing gun deaths.

That's in large part because of the Dickey Amendment that the Republican Congress passed in 1996 on the behalf of the NRA. The Dickey Amendment said plainly that "None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control." After last year's mass shooting at Umpqua Community College, former Congressman Jay Dickey told the Huffington Post: "I wish we had started the proper research and kept it going all this time. I have regrets."

It's good that Dickey has regrets about the amendment, but it doesn't change the fact that we've lost 20 years of gun violence research because of the unadulterated greed of gun manufacturers and the NRA's willingness to buy legislators like Dickey. What the NRA and the Republican shills for the gun lobby in Congress really don't want you to know, is that it is possible to reduce gun deaths by passing sensible gun control legislation.

http://sputniknews.com/radio_thom_hartmann_show/20160316/1036380674/how-to-reduce-gun-related-deaths-in-America.html#ixzz435AsbMb5

[TeddyR]

1. Why are you posting

ANYTHING that claims "ballistic imprinting or microstamping" actually works? Maryland and New York both had laws that required this, it didn't work to solve a single crime and both states dropped the programs.

[Eleanors38]

2. I read where most studies regarding gun control were not very credible. I think it was the... CDC.

[needledriver]

3. Dang.

And here I was sure this was going to be a post about firearms safety training in school, an end to the anti drug wars, and more funding for mental health care and suicide prevention.

[ManiacJoe]

4. How do these clueless authors get published?

"ballistic imprinting or microstamping"

[GreydeeThos]

5. SecularMotion could be on to something here

If we implement the plan from this drive by post and get 80% reduction, and

If we implement the plan from this

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172188903

drive by post and get a 90% reduction,

we could have a 170% reduction in gun deaths!

Think of it! A 170 percent reduction in gun deaths. That could make a difference.

[/font]

[Nuclear Unicorn]

6. Your math on percentages is totally wrong!

80% + 90% isn't 170% -- it's 8090%

[DonP]

7. Reminds me of some special "Super Hot Spark Plugs" I bought for my car years ago

Each one promised to increase my gas mileage by at least 20% so I bought 8 of them.

I finally got rid of them.

I just got tired of stopping every few miles to siphon all that extra gas they kept saving me out of the tank so it didn't spill over.

That story is every bit as true as the Gun Control statistics we see.