Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumRepealing Stand Your Ground is not about gun grabbing - it's about justice and the rule of law.
Castle laws are not about the "right to bear arms"
They allow people to get away with vigilante murder period.
Burglary is not a capital crime - except in Texas.
Carrying a Box of Skittles While Black is not a capital crime - except in Florida.
Let the Douchebag GOP/NRA poutrage all they want about "gun rights" and vigilante laws.
They will lose this fight.
The Second Amendment does not give you the right to be judge, jury and executioner without legal penalty.
Fuck SGY.
yup
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)yup
CAPHAVOC
(1,138 posts)Can you add in DHS and TSA? I thought the Democrats were going to end all this crap. The war on terror turns out it should have been a law enforcement matter after all. Although I thought otherwise myself at the time. We should have let the FBI and CIA handle it. Boy was I ever wrong.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)I guess you want to do away with Justifiable Homicide while you are it, right?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,477 posts)...are just angry and unreasonable.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Irate keyboarding often leads to typos.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)For hundreds of years, we have recognised that there are situations when one had to defende one's self with lethal force when the offender displayed a CLEAR AND DISTINCT intent to harm maim or kill for no good reason. These laws were enacted to fix sonething that WASN'T broken in the first place.
Now, sh!t is broken to the nth degree and this is a way for people to do away with someone that didn't like and by planning it well, GETTING AWAY WITH IT! This is what, in some cases, seems to be exactly what's happening.
spin
(17,493 posts)if there were no witnesses.
An individual could claim that he tried to retreat from an encounter and unless there was evidence to prove that he was lying, he could walk.
I think the Trayvon Martin shooting will cause the law to be rewritten to remove any ambiguities and confusion that allow police, prosecutors or judges to avoid arresting an indivual in a case where there are serious questions about his use of self defense.
The basic concept of the law is, in my opinion, sound. There should be no reason to require an person to retreat who is being attacked or is just about to be attacked by a person who intends to put him in the hospital or six feet under and has the capability to do it.
Retreating or fleeing is always a viable option, but not always the best.
eqfan592
(5,963 posts)Thanks again for yet another awesome post, spin.
jpak
(41,757 posts)What happened in FL was NOT justifiable homicide.
What happened in Texas with Joe Horn was NOT justified homicide.
Those were both vigilante killings made legal by douchebag castle laws.
yup
spin
(17,493 posts)when you say, "What happened in FL was NOT justifiable homicide", I would like to point out that an investigation is still being conducted and Zimmerman may well be arrested and prosecuted.
S_B_Jackson
(906 posts)the Grand Jury heard two weeks of testimony and evidence and found that his actions WERE justifiable.
As for Zimmerman, whether his shooting of Trayvon Martin was justifiable has yet to be determined. I support a rigorous examination of the events that did take place, but neither you nor anyone else on this board has sufficient evidence to make a determination either pro or con.
Anyone who claims that they do is simply talking through his hat.
yup yup yup
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)jpak
(41,757 posts)so, to answer your question...
yup
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)did indeed approach him, not flee.
The Zimmerman case isn't over by a damn sight.
jpak
(41,757 posts)he was going to shoot the alleged burglars in his NEIGHBOR'S yard.
They we shot in the back.
Vigilante Apologist Fail
yup
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)eqfan592
(5,963 posts)but hey, things like facts never have gotten in jpaks way before.
jpak
(41,757 posts)yup
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Do you have a source otherwise? I looked and did not find one.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)In what castle was George Zimmerman?
doc03
(35,300 posts)Was there ever any problem if you killed and armed intruder in your home? Now if anyone attempts entering your home or automobile without permission you can presume he is armed and shoot him. The burden of proof is on the dead victim. The SYG law is the Castle Doctrine on steroids you can just gun down anyone anywhere if you feel threatened, it's crazy.
jpak
(41,757 posts)yup
Oneka
(653 posts)Not so. The burden of proof is on the STATE, as it should be. That burden has never been on the victim.
doc03
(35,300 posts)home or occupied vehicle uninvited you can assume he is a threat and shoot him and the burden of proof is on the victim to prove otherwise. The homeowner is presumed innocent and it is up to the victim to prove otherwise. If you can assume the person is armed if he is in your home the only way I could see you being charged is if somehow the victim could prove you invited him inside. I don't think the SYG should even apply in the Trayvon Martin case though because Zimmerman was the aggressor. I think everyone knows if the kid was white and a black man gunned him down how it would have turned out. The SYG law is just crazy, it's like in Dodge City when an outlaw would gun someone down in cold blood and his gang claimed the other guy drew first he walked away.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)but in a criminal case, it is up to the State.
the guy who wrote the law agrees with you, and us.
If the black guy had a rich daddy who gave to the DA's campaign, I see the same thing happening. The lack of outrage would be the only difference. Just like lost kids. Cute rich or upper middle class white girl, all over the news. Black girl or over weight white kid from a trailer park, no satellite trucks to be found.
Don't know much about history do you?
http://us.history.wisc.edu/hist102/weblect/lec03/03_05.htm
doc03
(35,300 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)rrneck
(17,671 posts)This OP has all the intellectual sophistication and nuance of a concrete block.
But it's a brilliant performance piece revealing what's wrong with our political process. Very insightful.
Bravo.
jpak
(41,757 posts)and cheer leading for George Zimmerman
The lack of intellectual sophistication is apparent in that crowd.
yup
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)your glasses need a new perscription.
jpak
(41,757 posts)Your glasses are out of date and rose colored
yup
Florida's open carry ban was passed by a bunch of racists in 1893, but you don't support its repeal. The Miller Act (banning sending small handguns through the mail) was passed by a GOP congress and signed by Warren Harding, do you support its repeal?
The Gun Control Act of 1968 was sponsored by a "toter" who carried illegally in DC because he was afraid of hippies.
New York's licensing law was sponsored by and named after a gangster.
jpak
(41,757 posts)yup
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,477 posts)Occasionally I read something that can't be characterized by either or both of those words, in one of your posts. After I recover I usually assume that it was meant as sarcasm.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)yup.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)If you can.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,477 posts)...we're going to have to pass some DEM castle laws so the rest of us are protected as well as the GOP is.
And I have seen quite a lot of cheering for Zimmerman.
S_B_Jackson
(906 posts)to protect the property of third parties was codified (mainly) in 1973 and was done so by a Democratic State House, a Democratic State Senate, and signed into law by a Democratic governor, right?
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)because he doesn't want to say that they ................... and are................................. in print.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)Gotcha.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)black is white.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Here's your solution. :http://www.democraticunderground.com/101487941
The law is fine. The assholes implementing it are the problem.
Any law, however benign, can be perverted by nefarious jerks.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)your heroes in the new black panther party.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Hopefully the grabbers will lose this fight....we've made too much progress to turn back to the dark ages now. We've got many miles to go before the 2A is fully restored.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Your shtick's getting really tired...
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Looks like the NRA is winning. Has any state with SYG or Castle Doctrine seen a bill introduced to repeal them? Looks like you are counting your chickens before any eggs are even laid.
Response to jpak (Original post)
Post removed
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)When everybody respects everybody elses space no problem.