Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 02:50 AM Aug 2012

Two significant problems with "one gun a month" and "Waiting periods"

I was just sitting here in my comfy chair, taking detailed notes for my armory records, of my TWO latest purchases.. I am a collector of historically significant firearms. Some in my collection are over 100 years old, some where made new in the 1990's. ALL are historically relevant, some are VERY significant and rare pieces.

That being said, I am at that point in my collecting, that I have practically ALL that I want, minus a few "hard to find" weapons, so my rate of acquisition is very low. Actually until last week, I had not added a firearm to it for about 3 years.

Let me get to the point...

One day last week, as I was working (I drive for a living), their was a major backup on the interstate, to not be stuck in traffic, I used the "back roads" to get around. On my ride through the rural areas, I stumbled over a pawn shop. I like to stop and check them out when I can, you well make amazing finds at pawn shops. I stumbled over a historically significant rifle there! He had a M91 Mosin Nagant rifle in his shop, along with a few others. The rifle was in very good shape, and basically complete. What made this rifle very special was who made this Russian rifle... "Remington" During WW1, the Russians, found themselves desperate for rifles, and contracted with American manufactures "Remington" and "New England" to manufacture Mosin Nagants for them...Only a few of the order was delivered due to the bolsheviks taking power, The rifles are very uncommon, most Mosin Rifles found are of Soviet origin and not by any means rare, the American ones are..... The owner did not price them any differently for rarity...I walked out of the shop $125 dollars lighter, with about a 3 to 4 hundred dollar rifle in my hand. It is not my job to price his stock, he should know what he has.



I am very proud of my purchase, and rightfully so. Later on, when I got back to my company's office, the gate guard noticed my new rifle, and asked me about it, so I explained it too him. He told me that he had an Enfield carbine that he had owned since the 1960's, he was wanting to sell it, but figured no one would want an "old 303"

I told him, if it was still all original, I would be interested in looking at it, so we met at his home nearby.

He uncased, one of the BEST LOOKING Lee Enfield No5 Mk1 Jungle Carbines I had EVER seen! Actually it was NEW.

He had an early import of the rifle, that had only been fired dozen times since the mid 1960's It was one of the "new in the wrap" rifles that show up from time to time, with BIG BUCKS price tags. And completely untouched, down to a correct sling! He offered to sell it too me for $200, I have no problem just handing a pawn broker his asking price if it is wayyyyy low, But I will not do it to an individual. I told him upfront, that his rifle was worth far more than $200, it was worth closer to $600. He was very happy, and I offered him $400 for the rifle "on the spot&quot I had just bought another rifle so I was running short of funds) He said he was going on vacation and the $400 would be fine, and thanked me for my honesty!

In many states, these to purchases, of BOLT ACTION rifles, would be very illegal, simply because I bought two, in the same day. But when their RARITY and my 30 years of active collection of these sort of weapons I learned long ago, that the time to buy, is when you find what your looking for.

Also, keep in mind, that it only takes ONE gun to have a "spree" with so these restrictions are very pointless.... Even more so when you realize that many gun owners, including myself, have "more than one gun" already.

So exactly what is the point of a waiting period, when you already have a gun at home, it is nothing but simple harassment is what it is.

Also "one gun a month" is a joke, if straw purchasers is the problem, arrest them, after all they have broken federal law.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Two significant problems with "one gun a month" and "Waiting periods" (Original Post) virginia mountainman Aug 2012 OP
I applaud your nobility in dealing with an uneducated seller. nt rDigital Aug 2012 #1
Which state requires safeinOhio Aug 2012 #2
The usual states Lurks Often Aug 2012 #3
So, in about 90% of the country it is no problem and safeinOhio Aug 2012 #4
People like you who would like such a law in all 50 states. Clames Aug 2012 #5
Nice try Lurks Often Aug 2012 #6
You listen to Rush too much. safeinOhio Aug 2012 #7
Wrong again and yet another insult Lurks Often Aug 2012 #9
Sorry, where do you get your safeinOhio Aug 2012 #11
We both know you been around the RKBA forum enough to Lurks Often Aug 2012 #12
The corporations and the wealthy want my stuff krispos42 Aug 2012 #17
population of the states listed by Lurks Often: rrneck Aug 2012 #8
How many states prevent you from buying more safeinOhio Aug 2012 #10
How many people are prevented from buying one gun a month? nt rrneck Aug 2012 #13
If it's only one, that's one too many derby378 Aug 2012 #16
Congrats on the new rifles...good job. ileus Aug 2012 #14
You lucky bastard....!! PavePusher Aug 2012 #15
It would probably be a good idea to put waiting periods on access to every weapon. Remmah2 Aug 2012 #18

safeinOhio

(32,674 posts)
4. So, in about 90% of the country it is no problem and
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 09:01 PM
Aug 2012

and in the rest it is a state law that the people that were elected by the majority passed? What's the problem?

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
6. Nice try
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 07:39 PM
Aug 2012

we both know your post was an attempt to imply that the OP was a liar when he stated that some states require transfer through an FFL for private sales of long guns.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
9. Wrong again and yet another insult
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 08:48 PM
Aug 2012

Typical of some one who does either no or sloppy research. Get facts presented and they revert to insults.

And I don't listen/watch/read Rush, Hannity, Beck or any other RW radio/TV people.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
12. We both know you been around the RKBA forum enough to
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 09:43 PM
Aug 2012

for you to stop pretending you're that ignorant.

"Feinstein said on CBS-TV's 60 Minutes, February 5, 1995, "If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them . . . Mr. and Mrs. America, turn 'em all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren't here."

They may not want my stuff, but they sure want my money.

derby378

(30,252 posts)
16. If it's only one, that's one too many
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 10:42 PM
Aug 2012

I defer to Rachel Maddow on this concept: "But here's the thing about rights. They're not actually supposed to be voted on. That's why they're called rights."

 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
18. It would probably be a good idea to put waiting periods on access to every weapon.
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 02:19 PM
Aug 2012

We should all have to put in reservation to our favorite steak house.

Sporting good stores too. Baseball bats and gold clubs.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Two significant problems ...