Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Obama's Born-Again Missile Envy Over Syria: Wrong on All Counts
http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/pierre-tristam/51527/obamas-born-again-missile-envy-over-syria-wrong-on-all-countsObama's Born-Again Missile Envy Over Syria: Wrong on All Counts
by Pierre Tristam | September 8, 2013 - 9:01am
Here we go again. The United States is about to attack yet another Arab country over flimsy evidence that the regime used chemical weapons, with no clear strategy, no idea what to do next if the attack escalates a conflict thats never been Americas to worry about, and no viable plan if Syrias maggoty but lethal alliesIran, across the gulf from the Arab Peninsula, and Hezbollah in Lebanondecide to slosh after their share of blood.
~snip~
Cue the Crayola version of Obamas moralism, and a red line is drawn. And this is the guy I voted for thinking hed help America finally grow up from the Strangelove juvenalia of the Bush years.
Firing a few dozen cruise missiles is not going to cripple Assads regime. It is going to have the same effect as President Clintons missile attack on Sudan and Afghanistan in 1998 after the bombings of U.S. embassies in East Africa. That attack demolished a medicine factory and drew ridicule for its symbolic stupidity. Barack Obama turning Syria into another American front is a grave mistake that has unintended consequences written all over it (talk about collateral damage). It would be as reckless as attacking Iran over nuclear weapons, even if Iran possessed them. (Pakistan does, and its a more dangerous country than Iran has been: keep in mind that Osama bin laden lived for years unmolested within a few miles of the trigger bank of Pakistans nukes.)
And wheres the proof that the Syrian regime launched the attack? We were told that Obama was going to make a clear and irrefutable case that the Assad regime was responsible for the attacks that killed hundreds of civilians on Aug. 21. We have yet to see that proof. Maybe Colin Powell wasnt available to make the case. What we do have is even flimsier than what George W. Bush had when he claimed Saddam Hussein stockpiled weapons of mass destruction. We have one intercepted phone call from an alleged Syrian military official who thinks the attack turned out to be larger than planned. Who that official is, how do we know that he is tied to the regime, what proof do we have that the administration isnt making all this up? Dont ask. Obama wont tell. Curveball must have relatives.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 764 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama's Born-Again Missile Envy Over Syria: Wrong on All Counts (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Sep 2013
OP
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)1. His proof is secret evidence and classified documents, that would
Jeopardize national security if you saw it.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)2. He's meeting with 6 network Anchors today
In an attempt to recruit a Pom Pom squad to cheer USA USA USA