Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Is Rand Paul right that Cheney invaded Iraq for Halliburton Profits?
http://www.juancole.com/2014/04/invaded-halliburton-profits.htmlIs Rand Paul right that Cheney invaded Iraq for Halliburton Profits?
By Juan Cole | Apr. 8, 2014
David Corn at Mother Jones got the scoop: In 2009, Rand Paul gave a talk at Western Kentucky University in which he accused former vice president Dick Cheney of having gotten up the Iraq War to rescue his troubled oil services company, Halliburton, which along with its subsidiaries was awarded enormous no-bid contracts for work in post-invasion Iraq. Corn published the video at Mother Jones.
In it, Rand warned of the Military-Industrial Complex: We need to be fearful of companies that get so big that they can actually be directing policy When the Iraq War started, Halliburton got a billion-dollar no-bid contract. Some of the stuff has been so shoddy and so sloppy that our soldiers are over there dying in the shower from electrocution. I mean, it shouldnt be sloppy work; it shouldnt be bad procurement process. But it really shouldnt be that these people are so powerful that they direct even policy.
~snip~
Libertarians like Rand often hold that corporations are inherently good and efficient, but are corrupted by the state, which plays favorites and disrupts the markets magic hand for the purposes of private power. In this philosophy, a corporation would never go to war, but governments routinely do so, and drag corporations into these conflicts with distorting effects. (This premise is patently false look at the East India Companys freebooting conquest of India in the late 18th and early 19th century, with which the British state took decades to catch up). Pauls family has an unusual take on libertarianism, emphasizing states rights and limited but still fairly extensive Federal government, though with a relatively isolationist approach to foreign policy. (Rand Paul the father argues against the US defending Taiwan from Communist China, e.g.)
But Paul seemed to make the Marxist argument in this quote, saying that the problem was that Halliburton got too big. (It actually was a relatively small corporation and wouldnt have been important if Cheney hadnt become its CEO). He seems to say that Halliburton misused the government for its purposes rather than arguing that the government corrupted Halliburton.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 783 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Rand Paul right that Cheney invaded Iraq for Halliburton Profits? (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Apr 2014
OP
libodem
(19,288 posts)1. HELL YES
You know he's right!
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. Is The Pope Catholic? nt
[img][/img]