‘Low’ F-35 price tag is too high

[unhappycamper]

http://www.dailycall.com/news/editorial/150030242/Low-F-35-price-tag-is-too-high



‘Low’ F-35 price tag is too high
Last updated: October 03. 2014 12:57AM
Ryan Alexander

It’s not yet clear exactly how much the Pentagon’s fancy new F-35 combat jet will cost or when any of these stealth fighters will become operational. But the F-35 already shows great promise in the tough competition to become the most expensive weapons program ever undertaken.

Because of the jet’s projected eye-popping price tag of up to $344.8 million each, we at Taxpayers for Common Sense have always kept an eye on the F-35. And we were appalled by a request from the Pentagon in early September to shift funds from the so-called Overseas Contingency Operations fund to accelerate the purchase of eight of these planes.

The contingency fund supplements the official military budget to cover direct warfighting costs. But since the F-35s aren’t operational yet, there’s no way for them to do any warfighting. Fortunately, the House Appropriations Committee nixed that particular budgetary sleight of hand.

Days later, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) weighed in on the F-35, casting yet more doubt on its affordability. Following years of developing this fighter jet, the Pentagon “has not fully addressed several key risks to long-term affordability and operational readiness,” the GAO observed.

--

$344.8 million = (344 x 20) + 13 = 6,893 $50 grand jobs/handouts, whatever.

So each one on these things is the equivalent of almost 6,900 $50,000 jobs. Each one.

[Half-Century Man]

1. Flush this turd

Sue all involved parties to attempt recovery of some of the funds.