Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 02:09 PM Jan 2016

U.S. Navy: Railgun Tests to “Blow the Top Off a Mountain”

While the U.S. Navy had announced last year that it would take a prototype railgun to sea onboard the expeditionary fast transport USNS Trenton (JHSV-5) in 2016, the service may have to scupper those plans.

If the Navy does take the railgun out to sea on a fast transport, it will be in 2017 at the earliest. In lieu of testing the prototype rail gun in an at-sea environment, the Navy might instead proceed directly to developing an operational weapon system.

“It’s not definitely off but it’s not definitely going ahead,” Rear Adm. Peter Fanta, the Navy’s director of surface warfare, told Defense News during a Dec. 30 interview.

“Primarily because it will slow the engineering work that I have to do to get that power transference that I need to get multiple repeatable shots that I can now install in a ship. And I would frankly rather have an operational unit faster than have to take the nine months to a year it will take to set up the demo and install the systems, take the one operational [railgun] unit I have, put it on a ship, take it to sea, do a dozen shots, turn around, take it off, reinstall it into a test bed.”

http://www.nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/us-navy-railgun-tests-%E2%80%9Cblow-the-top-mountain%E2%80%9D-14869

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Navy: Railgun Tests to “Blow the Top Off a Mountain” (Original Post) bemildred Jan 2016 OP
"Set phasers to kill" - hmmm...sooner than we think? nt jonno99 Jan 2016 #1
I know its silly but in one of the Transformer movies mikehiggins Jan 2016 #2
Well, I do think this emphasis on size is a misplaced desire for a certain kill. bemildred Jan 2016 #3

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
2. I know its silly but in one of the Transformer movies
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 03:09 PM
Jan 2016

a ship mounted rail-gun blew up a pyramid. Okay, it was a silly scene in a silly movie but the science is not. An operational rail-gun system could blow an ICBM out of the sky.

Ain't science wonderful?

Now, if we could only cure that pesky cancer thing, maybe we'd still have a Bowie.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
3. Well, I do think this emphasis on size is a misplaced desire for a certain kill.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:46 AM
Jan 2016

Which does not really come from bigger explosions. You rapidly run into the law of diminishing returns when it comes ot making explosions bigger. Blowing things up is just not that tricky, but the cost goes up exponentially, and you still get nothing but rubble.

I was looking at that picture in the OP, going really fasssssst, and it just doesn't look very efficient, does it?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»U.S. Navy: Railgun Tests ...