California guardsmen and other troops won't be required to repay bonuses

[nitpicker]

http://www.militarytimes.com/articles/california-guardsman-and-other-troops-wont-be-required-to-repay-bonuses

California guardsmen and other troops won't be required to repay bonuses

By: Richard Lardner, The Associated Press, November 30, 2016

House and Senate negotiators have agreed not to require thousands of California National Guard troops to repay enlistment bonuses a decade after they signed up to serve in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Pentagon had demanded the money back after audits revealed overpayments by the Guard under pressure to fill ranks and hit enlistment goals. But a provision in the annual defense policy bill being filed Wednesday requires the Pentagon to waive the recoupment of a bonus unless there is evidence showing service members "knew or reasonably should have known" that they weren't eligible to receive the money. A vote in the House on the must-pass defense bill is expected by Friday, followed by action in the Senate next week.

The Guard offered enlistment bonuses of as much as $15,000 and student loan aid at the height of the two wars in the 2000s. Members of the California congressional delegation and veterans leaders had expressed outrage over a decision to force troops who had served overseas to return money when they fault lay with military recruiters.
(snip)

The provision to be included in the bill would apply beyond California troops and cover any member of the U.S. armed forces. The measure shifts the burden to Defense Department officials to prove service members were not eligible for a bonus or another type of special pay. A review board is to examine all the bonuses and student loan repayment contracts awarded between 2004 and 2015 "for which the department has reason to believe a recoupment of pay may be warranted," the measure states. Any service member determined not to have been eligible for the bonus pay or aid must be contacted by service officials and given the opportunity to submit "documentary and other evidence," according to the provision. The board is directed to determine recoupment of a bonus unwarranted "unless the board makes an affirmative determination, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the member knew or reasonably should have known" they weren't entitled to the money.
(snip)

[appal_jack]

1. Excellent news. Off to the greatest page! k&r, nt