Mattis wanted this woman as his second-in-command here's why she turned him down

[nitpicker]

http://www.businessinsider.com/michele-flournoy-mattis-deputy-2017-2

Mattis wanted this woman as his second-in-command — here's why she turned him down

Paul Szoldra
14h


Michèle Flournoy met with Defense Secretary Jim Mattis in December about coming on board as his deputy, but she ultimately turned down the job. A roundtable discussion in Politico Magazine published on Monday finally reveals why: Her own conscience would have made it difficult.

"When [Mattis] called me to ask me to consider ways to help, I had to give it due consideration," Flournoy told Politico's Susan Glasser. "But I also knew that he needed a deputy who wouldn't be struggling every other day about whether they could be part of some of the policies that were likely to take shape."

Flournoy, a cofounder of the Center for a New American Security, has served in a variety of top roles within the Pentagon in the past, and was considered a top pick for Secretary of Defense if Hillary Clinton had won. She most recently served during the Obama administration as undersecretary of defense for policy at the Pentagon, a highly-influential job that Mattis is still trying to get filled.

But Flournoy, like others, has wrestled with the question of how effective her advice and proposals might be in an administration that seemingly ignores experts at the State Department and DoD, as was the case for rolling out a travel ban on immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries. Even Mattis himself was frustrated when the Trump team didn't consult him on a potential pick for the Secretary of the Army.

"I think if [nominees] can see their way to do it, I think there is — if it doesn't violate your sense of values, we should all have — feel a duty to serve when called. I think for us outside of government — I mean, I'm running a think tank. We've had to wrestle with this question and, you know, the president of the United States is the commander in chief. He is the lead person responsible for our national security. You don't want to see him fail when it comes to U.S. national security," she said.

"So I think to the extent we can continue to offer good ideas to those in the administration who will listen, offer good analysis, offer suggestions — it’s incumbent on everyone, from all sides of the political spectrum, to do that. But as Wendy [Sherman] suggested, when decisions that violate our interests or our values or who we are, are made, we absolutely — we have a responsibility to speak out and push back and to offer smarter alternatives to advance and protect American interests, so — and our values."
(snip)

[ret5hd]

1. In other words: Hell no, Trump's batshit crazy and I don't wanna be tied to it.

[brer cat]

2. I think you summed it up quite succinctly. nt

[The Polack MSgt]

3. I understand why she said no

But I wish she could have found it in her self to serve again.

This country needs smart patriotic citizens serving in positions of influence. I believe that career government workers are the buffer of sanity between the White House and calamity.

I work in a Joint Service Agency with Active Duty, Guard, Reserve as well as Civil service and Contractors - No one is laughing now.

In the last 5 weeks, I have seen the Trump celebrants shut up.

It's slowly dawning on them that he really does not have a clue. He really is this disorganized and lazy.

Meanwhile the world is still dangerous. We are still part of the apparatus tasked to defend our country and project power in the world to advance the best interests of America - but the tangerine man at the wheel is over matched.

Mattis was a good choice - but he is one man he needs help.