Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 07:59 AM Sep 2013

Who wins in Syria? Why, the world's arms makers, of course

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-syria-military-hardware-cost-esimates-20130829,0,1077073.story



The $5+ billion dollar Zumwalt-class destroyer being built in Bath, ME. Pssst - Nimitz-class aircraft carriers usta cost 'only' $4.5 billion dollars.

Who wins in Syria? Why, the world's arms makers, of course
By Paul Whitefield
August 29, 2013, 1:06 p.m.

So you say the Syrians have it coming for gassing their own citizens?

OK, let’s skip that debate, then, and get down to the nuts and bolts: How much is this “measured response” gonna cost?

Call it “Bang for Our Bucks.”

Now, it’s hard to predict what a war will cost. Just ask the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld boys; remember their estimates that the Iraq war would, in essence, pay for itself through increased oil revenue and recovered assets?
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who wins in Syria? Why, the world's arms makers, of course (Original Post) unhappycamper Sep 2013 OP
Bingo. Scuba Sep 2013 #1
Pretty shallow analysis. bluedigger Sep 2013 #2

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
2. Pretty shallow analysis.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 11:12 AM
Sep 2013

Fixed costs such as warships and operating expenses? Better to look at replenishment costs for expended munitions if you want to make any meaningful case. Not impressed by Mr. Whitefield's "journalism".

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Who wins in Syria? Why, t...