UPDATE 1-Pentagon test-fires two ($25+ million) SM-3 missiles on one target

[unhappycamper]

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/19/usa-military-missile-defense-idUSL2N0HF1LP20130919


UPDATE 1-Pentagon test-fires two SM-3 missiles on one target
hu Sep 19, 2013 5:04pm EDT

By Andrea Shalal-Esa

(Reuters) - The U.S. military conducted the second test of the ship-based Aegis missile defense system in a week, firing two SM-3 missiles on Wednesday to intercept a separating target in space, the U.S. Defense Department said.

The Standard Missile-3, built by Raytheon Co, was the highest-ever intercept in space, meaning that a larger area can be defended, the company said on Thursday.

"You want to engage the enemy at the farthest point away from you that you can," said Mitch Stevison, Raytheon's SM-3 program director. Another SM-3 test involving an even more sophisticated target will take place soon, he said, without giving further details.

~SNIP~

She said the first test involved the SM-3 Block IA missile that is currently deployed, while Wednesday's test used the company's next-generation SM-3 Block IB missile. Company officials said the next test would pave the way for full-rate production of the new missiles.



unhappycamper comment: Since wikipedia notoriously under reports military hardware costs the $25 mill is just a starting point for what these things really cost.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SM-3

[djean111]

1. See? A missile here, a missile there - of course we need to cut food stamps!

[SummerSnow]

3. were doomed as a nation. When missles are more important than bread.

[enlightenment]

2. Years ago there was a

cartoon of a CEO penning a memo to his employees that said, "our downsizing has been so successful that the company is out of business".

That's what we are doing as a nation - spending so much money to protect the USofA that pretty soon we'll have our very own iron dome of insularity . . . but the "American Way of Life" will be gone and all that will be protected are the privileged few and the survivors scrabbling for scraps in what remains of the streets.

People have always scoffed at Utopian "fantasies" but embrace Dystopian futures (just look at film - how often do you see a future that is someplace you'd like to live?)

I don't understand that way of thinking, but it certainly works out well for the paranoid and the war hawks.

[AnotherMcIntosh]

4. Much better than squandering the money on food stamps.

/sarcasm off