Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 08:02 PM Aug 2012

VoteVets: Ryan budget "shortchanges veterans horribly"

With Ryan now officially Romney's choice for GOP VP nominee, today VoteVets is once again sending Jon Soltz's piece from March on the Ryan budget and vets to the group's email lists:


GOP Budget Doesn't Even Say the Word "Veteran"
Jon Soltz
Co-Founder of VoteVets.org, Iraq War Veteran

Posted: 03/21/2012 4:24 pm


Do Republicans care about keeping our promise to veterans?

Looking at the recently released GOP budget, written by Rep. Paul Ryan, it's hard to see how they do. In fact, looking at the nearly 100 page document, the word "veteran" doesn't appear once. Not once.

...


But, without saying the word "veteran," the budget tells us a lot about what they think about veterans. The budget calls for across the board spending freezes and cuts. If enacted, the Ryan GOP budget would cut $11 billion from veterans spending, or 13 percent from what President Obama proposes in his own plan.

...


Additionally, after the backlash against ending Medicare the last time Paul Ryan released a budget, they're at it again. That, too, affects veterans. I was speaking with one veteran in Missouri, who lost both of his legs in Iraq. His care now relies largely on Medicare, as it does for so many veterans who were wounded. In fact, older veterans, even those not wounded, rely on Medicare like any other senior. So, no, I couldn't believe that Paul Ryan and the GOP would again propose ending Medicare.

Yet, here we are.
A budget from the GOP that short changes veterans, horribly. And where does that money go? Not to reducing the debt. The debt as a share of GDP would actually increase under the Ryan plan. The money doesn't go towards anything, really. But it does go towards some people. As in $3 trillion in tax giveaways to the richest Americans and corporations. People like Mitt Romney, who already pays a tax rate lower than most of our troops.

...


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-soltz/gop-budget-doesnt-even-sa_b_1370899.html




And Romney made the VP announcement and introduced Ryan with a U.S. battleship as a prop.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
VoteVets: Ryan budget "shortchanges veterans horribly" (Original Post) pinboy3niner Aug 2012 OP
Whenever you get to feeling that you are more Downwinder Aug 2012 #1
Pissing off another demographic? longship Aug 2012 #2
His pick just made Obama white cloud Aug 2012 #3
I think Romney's pick ensures that Obama will be re-elected this fall. Major Hogwash Aug 2012 #6
And the Obama/Biden campaign is on top of it pinboy3niner Aug 2012 #7
I wouldn't give Romney's troubles . . to a monkey on a rock!! Major Hogwash Aug 2012 #10
Great post. Forwarding to all my military friends. Scuba Aug 2012 #4
The reason Romney used the U.S.S. Wisconsin as a prop to announce Ryan as his running mate . . Major Hogwash Aug 2012 #5
i wonder what would happen to the GI bill under Ryan's budget? WooWooWoo Aug 2012 #8
Imagine no more voc rehab for disabled vets pinboy3niner Aug 2012 #9
. pinboy3niner Aug 2012 #11

longship

(40,416 posts)
2. Pissing off another demographic?
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:23 PM
Aug 2012

There's gonna be nobody left but white straight male non-vet Christians. Nobody else will vote for these idiots.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
6. I think Romney's pick ensures that Obama will be re-elected this fall.
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 02:08 PM
Aug 2012

By a margin larger than when Bill Clinton was re-elected in 1996.
We don't have long to see if that is true or not.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
7. And the Obama/Biden campaign is on top of it
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 12:53 AM
Aug 2012

They are targeting individual constituencies--including veterans--with info, mailings and ads showing how the Romney/Ryan budget harms that constituency.

Picking Ryan may come to be seen as Romney's biggest blunder of all. Romney had been pretty successful in avoiding specifics (and avoiding being attacked on them)--until his VP choice instantly made the Ryan budget the Romney/Ryan budget.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
10. I wouldn't give Romney's troubles . . to a monkey on a rock!!
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 02:23 PM
Aug 2012

Romney should have picked Pawlenty.
Or Portman.
Either one would have been more "mainstream", and seemed more "normal" to the independent voters in this country, people that don't identify themselves as belonging to either the Democratic party or the Republican party.

Plus, neither one of them is as rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth, batshit crazy as Ryan.
Because neither one of them have a long history of worshiping an atheist who hated Democracy, yet wound up on Social Security and Medicare, the way Ayn Rand did.

I didn't know that Ryan came from a wealthy family until this weekend.
Incredible.
Two richy-rich, pampered, spoiled, selfish white kids who grew up and wanted all the power in this country to make the poor even poorer, take away medical aid to the sick, and make the elderly work longer before they can retire.

Unbelievable.

They're worse liars than Bush and Cheney were!
Now they are lying out of their asses when they say that they want to "save Medicare".
Yeah, they want to save Medicare just like the reasons Nixon stayed in Vietnam -- "we have to destroy it, in order to save it".

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
5. The reason Romney used the U.S.S. Wisconsin as a prop to announce Ryan as his running mate . .
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 01:58 PM
Aug 2012

. . is because they are both total loser hypocrites when it comes time to supporting the men and women who serve in the military.
And the veterans who already served.

The only thing those two assklowns give a damn about is investing in the large corporations who have companies that get the big military contracts, so they can get some of that delicious, creamy smooth "free" government hand-out money.

And that's all the MIC wants - "free" government hand-outs.
Every time one of the defense contractors pitches some outlandish new system to the Department of Defense, their lobbyists in Washington wine and dine all of the Congressmen from the districts where those companies are located that will build their new system.

Then those Congressmen reach into the deep, bottomless handy-dandy grab bag of U.S. government goodies and start awarding contracts to those companies, who kick back some of that "free" government money in the form of political donations to those same Congressmen.

What's pathetic is that no one in Congress has the guts to put any type of restrictions on those government hand-outs the MIC gets year in and year out.
President Obama is going to have to cut the Defense Budget by half, twice, over the coming years to bring it back into this planet's atmosphere.
And start focusing on taking care of the veterans who have already served in Bush's Wars.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
9. Imagine no more voc rehab for disabled vets
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 07:40 AM
Aug 2012

And amputees having to "pull themelves up by their bootstraps"--even though they have no boots.

The VA consistently ranks as good as, or better than, any health care system in the country. But the GOP chickenhawks are always pushing to destroy it by 'privatizing' it.

The G.I. Bill could easily be another one of their targets.

Fuck that, and fuck them. If they want to see pushback from vets, just let them TRY that shit. Even the old, traditional veterans service orgs that lean Right won't stand for that.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»VoteVets: Ryan budget &q...