Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone see something missing from this SI photo (p.59 of the last issue)? (Original Post) underpants Jan 2012 OP
No tongue? Scuba Jan 2012 #1
No Swoosh underpants Jan 2012 #6
He's not wearing Air Jordans? taterguy Jan 2012 #2
Exactly underpants Jan 2012 #4
Craig Ehlo? Auggie Jan 2012 #3
That's Ehlo's brother from another mother underpants Jan 2012 #5
6 inches of shorts? Scurrilous Jan 2012 #7
My underwear is longer than those shorts underpants Jan 2012 #8
Put some tights, a cape, & a mask on him and he could be Batman's sidekick Robin. Scurrilous Jan 2012 #9
Interesting... caraher Jan 2012 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jan 2012 #11
Yup, same pic caraher Jan 2012 #13
Adidas wilt the stilt Jan 2012 #14
Ceiling height in the gym? jmowreader Jan 2012 #12

underpants

(182,763 posts)
6. No Swoosh
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 04:19 PM
Jan 2012

there is no logo on the shoes. As I posted below I have actually seen this photo in an actual Laney yearbook. It was Converse - the early Bird/Magic model.

underpants

(182,763 posts)
4. Exactly
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 04:17 PM
Jan 2012

I happened to have seen this photo in a yearbook from Laney High. I don't remember why or who I happened to know that had one but at the time (mid 90's) I joked about how he was wearing Converse - everyone wore the Bird/Magic shoes because they were far advanced at the time , 1980- and said "boy that would be embarassing for Nike". Well apparently SI did a favor for their friends at Nike by airbrushing out the logo.

I emailed SI about out this. We'll see if it gets in the magazine or if I get an answer.

underpants

(182,763 posts)
5. That's Ehlo's brother from another mother
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 04:18 PM
Jan 2012

I wonder who that is. He must be laughing his tail off at that photo now.

underpants

(182,763 posts)
8. My underwear is longer than those shorts
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 05:00 PM
Jan 2012

The long shorts BTW came in with the Fab Five and the Arkansas teams of the early 90's

knee high socks!!! How about the belt on the shorts of the kid from the other team?

Response to caraher (Reply #10)

caraher

(6,278 posts)
13. Yup, same pic
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 11:51 PM
Jan 2012

underpants suggested it was airbrushed by SI, but it looks like the shoes were Nikes in the first place.

Clearly there's been some kind of digital processing; either the original photo was overexposed and the one I found had someone put details back in (I doubt it), or the original photo was not overexposed and the SI version was just manipulated in a way that washed out the logo. I wonder whether they were trying to bring out something else in the image, or did it in order to remove the logo.

 

wilt the stilt

(4,528 posts)
14. Adidas
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 07:31 AM
Jan 2012

These are the original Adidas superstars. I bought a pair and they were great but lasted about 2 weeks. They cost $23.99 a fortune in those days of Chuck taylor's which were about $12.00. To this day I swear the first Nike's caused broken feet. If you remember all the players back then all the players including Jordan were breaking their feet(top). I remember playing back then and my feet were killing me and I certainly didn't jump like them.

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
12. Ceiling height in the gym?
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 10:55 PM
Jan 2012

The way that's shot, it looks like Mike is about to bash his head on the rafters.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Anyone see something miss...