Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Auggie

(31,130 posts)
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 01:29 PM Dec 2018

College football conference games: necessary?

San Francisco columnist Bruce Jenkins advocates they be eliminated in favor of an eight team playoff scenario. He writes:

There’s a solution to this lost weekend, with an expanded playoff system as part of the bargain. It’s astounding that college football hasn’t seen the light, but let’s hope the blundering buffoons read this week’s helpful reminders from some very wise observers, including Yahoo Sports’ Dan Wetzel and former Stanford sports information director Gary Cavalli, who writes a weekly blog.

In essence: Ditch the conference championships altogether and make this the first weekend of an eight-team playoff.

Seriously, what’s the point of a “title game” when the regular season dictates everything you need to know? Washington had the Pac-12’s best record and beat Utah earlier this year. Oklahoma is the only one-loss team in the Big 12. Alabama was the clear champion of the SEC, and so forth.

SNIP

This column has long argued for a system that includes automatic bids for the Power Five conferences and three at-large bids. As suggested by Wetzel, this weekend’s first round could give us home-field advantages for the highest seeds and the following matchups: No. 8 Washington at No. 1 Alabama, No. 7 UCF at No. 2 Clemson, No. 6 Ohio State at No. 3 Notre Dame, and No. 5 Oklahoma at No. 4 Georgia.


He argues that it would be "great theater" and writes "the executive decisions in college football are all about revenue and TV ratings, each of which would be jacked up immeasurably with this new system."

LINK (possible paywall): https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/jenkins/article/College-football-s-postseason-There-s-a-13432931.php

I agree -- it's time for true playoffs. Thoughts?
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
College football conference games: necessary? (Original Post) Auggie Dec 2018 OP
I hate them. El Supremo Dec 2018 #1
The columnist is suggesting something a little different Auggie Dec 2018 #3
I'd like to see even the Ivy League get a chance every year. El Supremo Dec 2018 #8
Why didn't I think of that? erlewyne Dec 2018 #2
Four regional divisions, NE, SE, MW and W, BaileyBill Dec 2018 #4
I'm in favor of a FCS style playoff JonLP24 Dec 2018 #5
That's too many teams and games IMO Auggie Dec 2018 #6
FCS can handle it JonLP24 Dec 2018 #7

El Supremo

(20,365 posts)
1. I hate them.
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 01:33 PM
Dec 2018

As I once said, there should be 16 10 team conferences with the winners going to playoffs.

Auggie

(31,130 posts)
3. The columnist is suggesting something a little different
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 04:35 PM
Dec 2018

Five power conferences plus three "at-large".

If Alabama should beat Georgia today, even in a close score, that may be it for the Bulldogs -- even under your 16/10 system. Eliminating conference championships AND having three at-large (or wildcard) options creates a slightly more exciting venue. I think we all agree the best teams should make the playoffs. Here's an opportunity to do it in a better way than even the NFL.

El Supremo

(20,365 posts)
8. I'd like to see even the Ivy League get a chance every year.
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 09:22 PM
Dec 2018

But they'd need to get two more teams.

BaileyBill

(171 posts)
4. Four regional divisions, NE, SE, MW and W,
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 05:20 PM
Dec 2018

approx. 30 teams in each. Each team plays 9 schools w/in division and one in each of the other divisions. Each school is allowed 2 "rivalry games" (Texas/OU, Mich./OhioSt., etc. will always exist). Rest of schedule determined by computer rankings of the previous seasons' records so that each school plays essentially the same strength of schedule.

Top 4 teams in each division are seeded in 16-team playoff (ties broken by head-to-head records and "quality" of wins).

Voila. True National Champion with all schools having a chance at the first of the year. Rivalries remain, but fans also have the chance to visit schools they would otherwise never play, and Cinderella always has a chance.

Stay tuned for my solution for Middle-East peace.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
5. I'm in favor of a FCS style playoff
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 08:05 PM
Dec 2018

10 conference winners. 14 at large bids.

I don't want to give power conferences an unfair advantage. For the best teams you rank them and sometimes a conference member can sometimes have a better overall record than the conference champion this is where the at large bids come in.

It should spread recruiting around especially for the smaller conferences.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
7. FCS can handle it
Sat Dec 1, 2018, 08:25 PM
Dec 2018

Shorten the regular season but the proposal in the OP isn't a true one through 8 and they underrate mid major teams nowadaways. It is more fair the FCS way.

I pretty much boycott the playoffs the way it is and I'd probably boycott the proposal in the OP.

As I type this UCF just had back to back undefeated seasons.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»College football conferen...