Sports
Related: About this forumCollege football conference games: necessary?
San Francisco columnist Bruce Jenkins advocates they be eliminated in favor of an eight team playoff scenario. He writes:
In essence: Ditch the conference championships altogether and make this the first weekend of an eight-team playoff.
Seriously, whats the point of a title game when the regular season dictates everything you need to know? Washington had the Pac-12s best record and beat Utah earlier this year. Oklahoma is the only one-loss team in the Big 12. Alabama was the clear champion of the SEC, and so forth.
SNIP
This column has long argued for a system that includes automatic bids for the Power Five conferences and three at-large bids. As suggested by Wetzel, this weekends first round could give us home-field advantages for the highest seeds and the following matchups: No. 8 Washington at No. 1 Alabama, No. 7 UCF at No. 2 Clemson, No. 6 Ohio State at No. 3 Notre Dame, and No. 5 Oklahoma at No. 4 Georgia.
He argues that it would be "great theater" and writes "the executive decisions in college football are all about revenue and TV ratings, each of which would be jacked up immeasurably with this new system."
LINK (possible paywall): https://www.sfchronicle.com/sports/jenkins/article/College-football-s-postseason-There-s-a-13432931.php
I agree -- it's time for true playoffs. Thoughts?
El Supremo
(20,365 posts)As I once said, there should be 16 10 team conferences with the winners going to playoffs.
Auggie
(31,130 posts)Five power conferences plus three "at-large".
If Alabama should beat Georgia today, even in a close score, that may be it for the Bulldogs -- even under your 16/10 system. Eliminating conference championships AND having three at-large (or wildcard) options creates a slightly more exciting venue. I think we all agree the best teams should make the playoffs. Here's an opportunity to do it in a better way than even the NFL.
El Supremo
(20,365 posts)But they'd need to get two more teams.
erlewyne
(1,115 posts)A great Idea!
BaileyBill
(171 posts)approx. 30 teams in each. Each team plays 9 schools w/in division and one in each of the other divisions. Each school is allowed 2 "rivalry games" (Texas/OU, Mich./OhioSt., etc. will always exist). Rest of schedule determined by computer rankings of the previous seasons' records so that each school plays essentially the same strength of schedule.
Top 4 teams in each division are seeded in 16-team playoff (ties broken by head-to-head records and "quality" of wins).
Voila. True National Champion with all schools having a chance at the first of the year. Rivalries remain, but fans also have the chance to visit schools they would otherwise never play, and Cinderella always has a chance.
Stay tuned for my solution for Middle-East peace.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)10 conference winners. 14 at large bids.
I don't want to give power conferences an unfair advantage. For the best teams you rank them and sometimes a conference member can sometimes have a better overall record than the conference champion this is where the at large bids come in.
It should spread recruiting around especially for the smaller conferences.
Auggie
(31,130 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Shorten the regular season but the proposal in the OP isn't a true one through 8 and they underrate mid major teams nowadaways. It is more fair the FCS way.
I pretty much boycott the playoffs the way it is and I'd probably boycott the proposal in the OP.
As I type this UCF just had back to back undefeated seasons.