Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forum(OH) Supreme Court rules firing justified for teacher accused of advancing religion in classroom
Last edited Tue Nov 19, 2013, 10:36 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2013/11/supreme_court_rules_firing_jus.htmlBy Robert Higgs, Northeast Ohio Media Group
Email the author | Follow on Twitter
on November 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, updated November 19, 2013 at 5:43 PM
In this photo from April 2008, John Freshwater, center, addresses a crowd on Mount Vernon's public square. The Ohio Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the firing of the public school science teacher who was accused of preaching religious beliefs in class.
Mount Vernon News via Associated Press
COLUMBUS, Ohio - The Ohio Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld Mount Vernon city schools firing of an eighth-grade science teacher who was accused of advancing religion and the Christian theory of creationism in his classroom.
But the court held that the districts orders that he put away the personal Bible he kept on his desk violated his First Amendment rights of freedom of religion and therefore would not have been sufficient cause to fire him.
And the court did not address another question surrounding the case: Whether the teacher was unconstitutionally injecting his religious beliefs into the classroom.
The court, in a 4-3 decision, ruled that the district did not abuse its discretion when it fired John Freshwater, upholding a lower courts ruling that the action was supported by just cause. Freshwater was seeking reinstatement and back pay.
more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1144 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(OH) Supreme Court rules firing justified for teacher accused of advancing religion in classroom (Original Post)
cbayer
Nov 2013
OP
I assume burning a mark on a student's arm with an electrical coil would be a firing offense
struggle4progress
Nov 2013
#2
(It's Ohio. PA would have ordered he get back pay.)
cbayer
(146,218 posts)3. Oopsie! Fixed.
struggle4progress
(118,269 posts)2. I assume burning a mark on a student's arm with an electrical coil would be a firing offense
almost anywhere, so perhaps that allegation wasn't proved
It doesn't sound here like the court ruled on any actual separation issue but merely upheld the school's view that administrators could fire a teacher for "insubordination"