Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumErick Erickson’s persecution narrative: How right-wing Christian pundits avoid accountability
The defense of Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson sadly epitomizes a technique aimed at protecting a kind of cruelty
ELIZABETH STOKER
More surprising than Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertsons recent comments to GQ magazine regarding gay men is the fact that anyone felt compelled to defend him after his pursuant suspension from the television show. But Robertsons suspension is politically convenient for a handful of right-wing Christian pundits who have been developing a narrative of persecution for years, and they were quick to leap to his defense.
Take Erick Erickson, for example, who tweeted voluminously following news of Robertsons hiatus. Ericksons tack was typical: he conflated offense over Robertsons remark with imagined offense over the use of innocuous words (such as patriarch) and argued that A&Es decision to remove him from the show was tantamount to persecution of Robertson as a Christian. This all fits neatly into Ericksons apocalyptic vision of American discourse, in which any expression of the Christian conception of the good is being systematically silenced by an anti-Christian media movement.
Of course, Erickson neglected to note that the backlash against Robertson had little to do with the doctrinal content of his statements, such as it was. (Its also the case that suggesting that disapproval of homosexuality belongs to Christianity writ large says more about Ericksons construal of Christianity than the actual diversity of opinion within the religion: for the record, not all Christian denominations or congregations object to gay people or relationships, though this article will deal with those that do.) It was rather the decision Robertson made to frame his objection to homosexuality in terms of disgust and revilement that generated the stir. GLAAD spokesperson Wilson Cruz, for instance, characterized Robertsons remarks as vile and extreme stereotypes. Chad Griffin of the Human Rights Campaign noted that Robertsons remarks failed to treat gay people with the respect and dignity that should be extended to all persons.
These objections, and many more like them, are not objections to the vague sexual complementarianism Robertson seems to be proposing in his remarks, nor to the Christian doctrine that underlies that view of human sexuality. Rather, they object to the tone of disrespect and disgust that Robertson advances by his framing of gay people. Robertson claims, for instance, that gay relationships are a mere stepping-stone to sexually abusing animals, and to having unrestrainedly promiscuous sex. He later equated gay people with terrorists, glibly noting that he regards the salvific potential of each category of person to be identical. Rounding out his meditation on sexuality, Robertson declared vaginas preferable to a mans anus, concluding that sin is illogical on those grounds. The notable exclusion of any discussion of lesbian sexuality is typical, and demonstrates that theres more disgust than doctrine at work here: to fellows like these, lesbians arent gross. (See the rumination on vaginas.)
:::snip:::
http://www.salon.com/2013/12/23/erick_ericksons_persecution_narrative_how_right_wing_christian_pundits_avoid_accountability/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 690 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Erick Erickson’s persecution narrative: How right-wing Christian pundits avoid accountability (Original Post)
DonViejo
Dec 2013
OP
Agreed. He's on extended (probably paid) vacation, and will be back next year to higher
AtheistCrusader
Dec 2013
#2
cbayer
(146,218 posts)1. What a circus this has become.
It's all kabuki theater.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)2. Agreed. He's on extended (probably paid) vacation, and will be back next year to higher
ratings, and yippee. Nothing changed except more money in his pockets.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)3. Agree. I think these guys are just laughing their asses off over this whole thing.
It's all show.