Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 03:21 PM Jan 2014

83-Year-Old Nun to Be Sentenced for Sabotage

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/83-year-nun-sentenced-sabotage-22223192

NASHVILLE, Tenn. January 27, 2014 (AP)
By TRAVIS LOLLER Associated Press

An 83-year-old Catholic nun convicted in a protest and break-in at the primary U.S. storehouse for bomb-grade uranium will find out Tuesday whether she spends what could be the rest of her life in prison.

Sister Megan Rice is one of three Catholic peace activists convicted of sabotage last year after they broke into the nuclear weapons plant in Oak Ridge, Tenn. Sentencing for all three is scheduled for 9 a.m. Tuesday at U.S. District Court in Knoxville.

The government has recommended sentences of about six to nine years each for Rice, Michael Walli and Greg Boertje-Obed (bohr-CHEE' OH-bed'). It also is seeking restitution of nearly $53,000 for damage incurred when the three cut through fences and painted slogans on the outside wall of the uranium processing plant. The protesters also splattered blood and hammered on the wall.

The activists are asking for leniency. They say their actions at the Y-12 National Security Complex were symbolic and meant to draw attention to America's stockpile of nuclear weapons, which they call immoral and illegal.

more at link

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
83-Year-Old Nun to Be Sentenced for Sabotage (Original Post) cbayer Jan 2014 OP
I hope the court is merciful. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #1
Those people should be given medals Politicalboi Jan 2014 #2
Their reasons were good, but their actions were illegal. trotsky Jan 2014 #3
It is a perfectly good OP. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #4
Yeah, I don't get the points thing either. trotsky Jan 2014 #5
Then why bring it up? hrmjustin Jan 2014 #10
Because it's important to her? trotsky Jan 2014 #11
I don't agree with you but go ahead. hrmjustin Jan 2014 #12
Ok. trotsky Jan 2014 #13
"If a religious person does something good, Htom Sirveaux Jan 2014 #6
Nope. n/t trotsky Jan 2014 #7
Why not? n/t Htom Sirveaux Jan 2014 #8
Since you are new here, you may not have seen the multiple times I've posted this. trotsky Jan 2014 #9
So if it was verifiable that God existed Htom Sirveaux Jan 2014 #14
Nope, because my sense of morality does not come from a god. trotsky Jan 2014 #15
Then isn't verifiability a red herring? Htom Sirveaux Jan 2014 #19
Ah but your example did not include any sort of reason WHY the god should be obeyed. trotsky Jan 2014 #20
What is that more fundamental issue? n/t Htom Sirveaux Jan 2014 #21
Post removed Post removed Jan 2014 #17
This is interesting: her parents were Catholic Workers. rug Jan 2014 #16
Apples fall from apple trees. cbayer Jan 2014 #18
Careful, this could be perceived as a positive sidebar goldent Jan 2014 #22
I hope the court shows some decency and common-sense LeftishBrit Jan 2014 #23

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
3. Their reasons were good, but their actions were illegal.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 04:28 PM
Jan 2014

Depending on the attitude of the judge and whether he's sympathetic to the cause, these folks could be used to send a message.

But other than the oldest protestor's occupation though, I'm not sure I see how this story is particularly tied to religion. People of all faiths, or no faith, oppose nuclear weapons and have been arrested for protests against them.

Why it's almost as if you were trying to score "points" for something, cbayer. Odd.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
11. Because it's important to her?
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 05:41 PM
Jan 2014

I'm trying to understand her infatuation with referring to "points" and "teams" when responding to people. It seems to be an attempt to dismiss or trivialize their point of view. Perhaps she will clarify.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
13. Ok.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 05:54 PM
Jan 2014

And if you ever see anyone else bring up the notion of "teams" and "points," let me know, so I won't be unfairly singling her out. Thanks hrmjustin!

Htom Sirveaux

(1,242 posts)
6. "If a religious person does something good,
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 05:09 PM
Jan 2014

it doesn't mean anything, because an atheist could have done the same. But if a religious person does something bad, that's a manifestation of the inherent corruption at the core of religion."

Would you agree with that statement?

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
9. Since you are new here, you may not have seen the multiple times I've posted this.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 05:22 PM
Jan 2014

I don't think religion is necessary for people to be good. Nor do I think it is always to blame for bad behavior. The problem I have with religious belief is best described by blogger Greta Christina here.

Htom Sirveaux

(1,242 posts)
14. So if it was verifiable that God existed
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 06:58 PM
Jan 2014

and wanted us to oppress women and gays, would you oppress women and gays?

Htom Sirveaux

(1,242 posts)
19. Then isn't verifiability a red herring?
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 07:48 PM
Jan 2014

That article made lack of verifiability the foundation for the case against religion, but if adding verifiability wouldn't make religion alright, then there is a more fundamental issue, isn't there?

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
20. Ah but your example did not include any sort of reason WHY the god should be obeyed.
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 08:55 AM
Jan 2014

Your example said that if a god existed and demanded something, would I do it? Just because a god exists is no reason to do what it commands.

There is a more fundamental issue here, you are right. But I don't think you are seeing it.

Response to trotsky (Reply #3)

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
16. This is interesting: her parents were Catholic Workers.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 07:16 PM
Jan 2014
Rice, the youngest of three girls in an Irish Roman Catholic family, was born and raised in Manhattan. Her father, Frederick W. Rice, was an obstetrician-gynecologist who taught at New York University and treated patients at several New York City hospitals. Her mother, Madeleine Newman Hooke Rice, was a Barnard College graduate who undertook graduate studies at Columbia University while her children were growing up, obtaining a Ph.D. in history and writing a dissertation on Catholic views about slavery. Frederick and Madeleine Rice were active participants in the Catholic Worker movement and considered Dorothy Day a good friend.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megan_Rice

That was 70 years ago.

goldent

(1,582 posts)
22. Careful, this could be perceived as a positive sidebar
Wed Jan 29, 2014, 02:38 AM
Jan 2014

and that I'm afraid would be aiding and abetting in the scoring of points

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»83-Year-Old Nun to Be Sen...