Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumNew Rules On Religious Expression Spark Religious Right Complaints About Christian ‘Persecution'
A recent effort by the Pentagon to make religious minorities feel more welcome in the U.S. Armed Forces has the Religious Right up in arms.
Last week, the Pentagon announced in a directive that it would relax certain rules governing a soldiers personal appearance while in uniform. Specifically, armed services members will be able to display beards and some tattoos, if theyre for religious reasons, as well as turbans, yarmulkes or other religious clothing. The directive covers a range of accommodations for a variety of religions, including Islam and Wicca.
This is part of a wider attempt by the military to accommodate individual expressions of sincerely held beliefs, the Pentagons directive said. The directive is not absolute. Religious expression can still be curbed if it affects things like a soldiers health, safety or preparedness, or the cohesion of military units.
But the Religious Right, which has long sought to Christianize the U.S. Armed Forces, threw a fit over this development, charging that religious minorities are getting special treatment while Christians face persecution in the military.
https://blog.au.org/blogs/wall-of-separation/military-maneuvers-new-armed-forces-rules-on-religious-expression-spark
Last week, the Pentagon announced in a directive that it would relax certain rules governing a soldiers personal appearance while in uniform. Specifically, armed services members will be able to display beards and some tattoos, if theyre for religious reasons, as well as turbans, yarmulkes or other religious clothing. The directive covers a range of accommodations for a variety of religions, including Islam and Wicca.
This is part of a wider attempt by the military to accommodate individual expressions of sincerely held beliefs, the Pentagons directive said. The directive is not absolute. Religious expression can still be curbed if it affects things like a soldiers health, safety or preparedness, or the cohesion of military units.
But the Religious Right, which has long sought to Christianize the U.S. Armed Forces, threw a fit over this development, charging that religious minorities are getting special treatment while Christians face persecution in the military.
https://blog.au.org/blogs/wall-of-separation/military-maneuvers-new-armed-forces-rules-on-religious-expression-spark
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 646 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Rules On Religious Expression Spark Religious Right Complaints About Christian ‘Persecution' (Original Post)
SecularMotion
Jan 2014
OP
imagine the uproar if they banned all religious accessories, including cross necklaces
unblock
Jan 2014
#1
The Right throws tantrums frequently: it tells us something about the maturity of the audience
struggle4progress
Jan 2014
#5
unblock
(52,196 posts)1. imagine the uproar if they banned all religious accessories, including cross necklaces
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)2. LOL!
Better be sure what you ask for, you just might get it.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)3. Oh, no! Sandy Rios is on to them.
She see that this is an underhanded attempt to accommodate Muslims! Muslims, I tell you. We certainly wouldn't want to do that.
Iggo
(47,549 posts)4. Fuck the Religious Right.
:middlefinger:
struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)5. The Right throws tantrums frequently: it tells us something about the maturity of the audience
to which they're playing