Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumCatholic diocese to file for bankruptcy protection
HELENA, Montana (AP) The Roman Catholic Diocese of Helena is set to file for bankruptcy protection in advance of proposed settlements for two lawsuits that claim clergy members sexually abused 362 people over decades and the church covered it up.
Diocese spokesman Dan Bartleson said in a statement Friday the bankruptcy reorganization case came after confidential mediation sessions with the plaintiffs' attorneys, resulting in the deals to resolve the abuse claims.
The settlement details are being worked out, but the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Montana would be responsible for approving and supervising the disbursement of $15 million to compensate the identified victims, plus an additional amount set aside for those who come forward later.
...
The two lawsuits filed in 2011 claim clergy members groomed and then abused the children from the 1940s to the 1970s. They claim the diocese shielded the offenders and knew or should have known the threat they posed to children.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/31/catholic-diocese-files-for-bankruptcy-protection/5078991/
Diocese spokesman Dan Bartleson said in a statement Friday the bankruptcy reorganization case came after confidential mediation sessions with the plaintiffs' attorneys, resulting in the deals to resolve the abuse claims.
The settlement details are being worked out, but the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Montana would be responsible for approving and supervising the disbursement of $15 million to compensate the identified victims, plus an additional amount set aside for those who come forward later.
...
The two lawsuits filed in 2011 claim clergy members groomed and then abused the children from the 1940s to the 1970s. They claim the diocese shielded the offenders and knew or should have known the threat they posed to children.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/31/catholic-diocese-files-for-bankruptcy-protection/5078991/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1465 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Catholic diocese to file for bankruptcy protection (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
OP
AND to force their insurers to pay for claims stemming from acts that occurred
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2014
#4
They are pulling every trick in the book to pawn this off on anyone/anything.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2014
#3
They think Obamacare means a pre-existing child abuse condition is covered (nt)
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
#5
msongs
(67,366 posts)1. borrow money from the pope, he has multi billions in his art collection nt
spartan61
(2,091 posts)2. The diocese wants bankruptcy protection
AND tax exempt status????? What a racket!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)4. AND to force their insurers to pay for claims stemming from acts that occurred
long before the insurance company even existed.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)6. No Dice
That would imply a pre-existing condition.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)3. They are pulling every trick in the book to pawn this off on anyone/anything.
Tying to make their insurers pay it for abuse that occurred before the polices, let alone the insurer itself even existed.
continuous trigger claims.
Fucking scumbags. Zero shame.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,271 posts)5. They think Obamacare means a pre-existing child abuse condition is covered (nt)
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)7. Because nothing says taking responsibility like filing for bankruptcy.
rug
(82,333 posts)8. And?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)9. one of two options
1. You really don't see anything wrong with this.
2. You really are that obtuse.
rug
(82,333 posts)10. There's a third opition.
I don't attack blindly due to preformed opinions.
What word am I looking for?