Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 10:45 PM Mar 2014

Pope Francis appeals for prayers for the Ukraine

ICN. Posted: Sunday, March 2, 2014 11:22 pm

Pope Francis asked for prayers for Ukraine on Sunday, which he said was living through a very sensitive situation. The Holy Father expressed the hope that all parts of the country “will endeavour to overcome misunderstandings and build together the future of the nation.” The Pope also appealed to the international community “to support any initiative for dialogue and harmony.”

He made the call following the recitation of the Angelus in St Peter’s Square. Before the prayer, referring to the day's Mass readings, Pope Francis underlined the need to trust in the Divine Providence of God and also stressed as Christians, we should help our brothers and sisters who are in need.

Looking at society today where people live in precarious conditions such as poverty and the difficulties faced by many as a result of the economic crisis that offends their dignity, the Pope said that in times like these the words of Jesus may seem abstract. But in reality he underlined, these words are more present than ever because they remind us that we cannot serve two masters: God and wealth. As long as everyone tries to accumulate for themselves Pope Francis added, there will never be justice.

The Holy Father went on to say that: “A heart occupied by his own desire is an empty one .. because Jesus has repeatedly warned the rich, a heart possessed by riches leaves little room for faith." The Pope noted that “To make sure that no one lacks bread, water, clothing, housing, work, health, we must all recognize that we are children of the Father who is in heaven, and then brothers and sisters” and we should act accordingly as Christians.

http://www.indcatholicnews.com/news.php?viewStory=24261

102 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pope Francis appeals for prayers for the Ukraine (Original Post) hrmjustin Mar 2014 OP
Amen shenmue Mar 2014 #1
Ukraine. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #3
And Scotland! Nt pkdu Mar 2014 #26
Empty platitudes skepticscott Mar 2014 #2
Why am I not surprised that skepticscott interjects an irrelevant and nasty sneer Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #4
The pope likely can't do anything to alleviate the situation skepticscott Mar 2014 #5
In other words, I called it correctly Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #7
Do you think those prayers are ever going to do anything? Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #10
Do you think that the head of a religion does not believe in the efficacy of prayer? Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #11
I'm sorry Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #13
Tell that to all of the children skepticscott Mar 2014 #40
Augustine of Hippo said Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #46
Sounds like Augustine knew that prayers wouldn't do the trick. progressoid Mar 2014 #60
No, he's saying that prayer alone will not do the trick Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #89
Here's how I heard that "joke". progressoid Mar 2014 #94
My version of it had a point relevant to the topic Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #102
While I agree that those parents Dorian Gray Mar 2014 #87
I'm accusing a religious leader of hypocrisy for how he speaks of wealth skepticscott Mar 2014 #12
No, he is not being hypocritical. Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #24
Keep those insults coming, FA. trotsky Mar 2014 #27
Oh, you're doing a fine job all by yourself, trotsky. rug Mar 2014 #28
One of the main things a Christian is obliged to do is tell the truth Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #35
Post removed Post removed Mar 2014 #41
Uh, calling people fucking imbeciles is a great way to win people to your cause shenmue Mar 2014 #51
You could learn a little Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #52
Truth is not an insult. Leontius Mar 2014 #42
Speaking of examples of good Christians... trotsky Mar 2014 #45
I dislike him because he champions bigotry skepticscott Mar 2014 #30
The actual hypocrite is you, skepticscott Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #36
I'm not even going to go whining to the moderators skepticscott Mar 2014 #37
I have exactly ONCE complained about a post directed at me. Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #48
What is funny is that EvilAL Mar 2014 #97
While I don't think prayers will hurt, they need a whole lot more than that. cbayer Mar 2014 #6
Calling for prayers is just about all the Pope can do. n/t Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #8
I know and glad to know he is shining some light on it. cbayer Mar 2014 #9
They do. Dorian Gray Mar 2014 #88
A little juxtaposition for your Monday consideration Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #14
You understand that it is a church building? hrmjustin Mar 2014 #15
You're right. His place is pretty austere Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #16
No he does not live there either. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #17
Please, then Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #18
This is the building and I believe this is his rooms now. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #19
Wretched excess! rug Mar 2014 #20
Oh no! He has shiny floors! hrmjustin Mar 2014 #21
! rug Mar 2014 #22
Indoor plumbing even? goldent Mar 2014 #29
And a bed! okasha Mar 2014 #32
OK, fine. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #23
Um I never said that the RCC has no wealth. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #25
Which is why I accused him skepticscott Mar 2014 #31
As the member of the Jesuits he took a vow of poverty. That means he Cleita Mar 2014 #101
Oh, please. okasha Mar 2014 #33
So we are ignoring Vatican City? Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #34
So you think all of Vatican City okasha Mar 2014 #43
When did I say that? Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #44
See your posts 14 and 16. okasha Mar 2014 #80
You claimed I said the Vatican City was the Pope's personal property Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #90
What do you think "his" and "has" mean, okasha Mar 2014 #98
Is it not his place? Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #99
No, it constitutes but a fraction of the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church... Act_of_Reparation Mar 2014 #49
Best Pope ever yeoman6987 Mar 2014 #86
How is he different from the last pope. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #91
seems like he's less of an asshole in public, yeoman6987 Mar 2014 #92
I'll give you that. Goblinmonger Mar 2014 #93
Hope that doesn't make it worse. AtheistCrusader Mar 2014 #38
There is contradictory data about this whole prayer/surgical patient thing, and cbayer Mar 2014 #39
Ukraine would love to know. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #47
Would they? Act_of_Reparation Mar 2014 #50
The church is a big part of that nations life. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #54
No, it isn't Act_of_Reparation Mar 2014 #57
Wow that is news to me. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #58
That may be in large part to an extensive recent history of serious persecution for being religious. cbayer Mar 2014 #59
I don't understand where you're trying to go with this Act_of_Reparation Mar 2014 #61
All I am saying is that it went from a very religious country to a very non-religious cbayer Mar 2014 #62
I would argue that is something of an oversimplification Act_of_Reparation Mar 2014 #67
supprression of christianity stopped almost entirely at the start of WWII. Warren Stupidity Mar 2014 #66
Where did you get that? rug Mar 2014 #64
Well, that will make some people feel much better about doing nothing. mr blur Mar 2014 #53
We don't know that he is doing nothing. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #55
The pope shining light on the situation is doing something. cbayer Mar 2014 #56
"asking people to pay attention and to learn more about the situation is certainly a positive thing" trotsky Mar 2014 #63
Just because you don't think prayer does noyhing doesn mean it does nothing. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #65
And just because you think it does something doesn't mean it does, either. n/t trotsky Mar 2014 #70
Fair point but I think it is doing something. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #71
I personally think the diplomacy effort by Secretary Kerry... trotsky Mar 2014 #72
Yes but most of us are not in the position to do that level of work. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #73
Whether they are "positive" is unproven. trotsky Mar 2014 #74
I don't believe it is harmful. And please quoting that study because I don't care what it says. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #75
Yes, I am aware that facts are irrelevant to religious belief. trotsky Mar 2014 #76
That study is no fact and don't put me in the same sentence with them please. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #77
Then don't dismiss evidence so willfully as they do. trotsky Mar 2014 #78
I and other believers will not stop praying for people because if one study. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #79
Nor will Fred Phelps stop hating gays... trotsky Mar 2014 #81
My praying for others is connected to phelps bigotry. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #82
If you reserve the right to reject any evidence that contradicts your beliefs, trotsky Mar 2014 #83
And Jesus wept! hrmjustin Mar 2014 #84
Learning about the situation itself does nothing. rug Mar 2014 #68
In politics, this is called jawboning. okasha Mar 2014 #85
But the pope did it, so it must be bad. cbayer Mar 2014 #95
Oh, of course, that's EXACTLY what others are saying. trotsky Mar 2014 #96
And if the tanks do roll in, okasha Mar 2014 #100
Wow the pope got people talking. hrmjustin Mar 2014 #69
 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
2. Empty platitudes
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 10:59 PM
Mar 2014

From the leader of an organization that throughout history has piled up almost uncountable wealth. And that has always tried to use its wealth and influence to make nations do its bidding.

But yeah..he knows a PR op when he sees one.

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
4. Why am I not surprised that skepticscott interjects an irrelevant and nasty sneer
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 08:32 AM
Mar 2014

Tell me, what can the Pope do to alleviate the situation in Ukraine? Be specific. While you're at it, what are you doing about it? Be specific.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
5. The pope likely can't do anything to alleviate the situation
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 10:22 AM
Mar 2014

Hence my labeling of his statements as empty platitudes, designed to get him attention, but having no other significant effect.

And I don't have the arrogance to assume that I can make the situation in the Ukraine better, either. It's always assumed by the presumptively wise that if people would just "do" something (what that something is, is usually left vague) that we will necessarily and always make things better and not worse. History has shown how wrongheaded that is.

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
7. In other words, I called it correctly
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 11:18 AM
Mar 2014

You just wanted to make a nasty sneer at him.

After all, you are denouncing a religious leader for calling for prayers from his followers. I know that I am forbidden from calling you a bigot, so I'm not.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
10. Do you think those prayers are ever going to do anything?
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 12:53 PM
Mar 2014

Any historical evidence that it will? Most studies indicate either no result of prayers or a negative result.

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
11. Do you think that the head of a religion does not believe in the efficacy of prayer?
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 01:14 PM
Mar 2014

If so, you are being quite silly.

At worst, prayer can do no harm.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
13. I'm sorry
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 01:29 PM
Mar 2014

I didn't mean to ask you what you thought the Pope thought.

Do YOU think the prayers are going to do anything and do you have any instances to back up what I assume is a "yes" answer?

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
40. Tell that to all of the children
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 07:49 PM
Mar 2014

who died because their parents prayed for them to get well and did nothing else.

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
46. Augustine of Hippo said
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 11:27 AM
Mar 2014

"We should pray as if it all depended on God, and we should work as if it all depended on us."

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
89. No, he's saying that prayer alone will not do the trick
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 07:56 AM
Mar 2014

Last edited Thu Mar 6, 2014, 09:59 AM - Edit history (1)

I should remind you of the old joke about Mrs. Murphy and the flood.

A terrible storm came into a town and local officials sent out an emergency warning that the riverbanks would soon overflow and flood the nearby homes. They ordered everyone in the town to evacuate immediately. Mrs. Murphy, a faithful Christian, heard the warning and decided to stay, saying to herself, "I will trust God and if I am in danger, then God will send a miracle to save me."

The neighbors came by her house and said, "We're leaving and there is room for you in our car, please come with us!" But Mrs. Murphy declined. "I have faith that God will save me."

As she stood on the porch watching the water rise up the steps, a man in a canoe paddled by and called , "Hurry and come into my canoe, the waters are rising quickly!" But she again said, "No thanks, God will save me."

The floodwaters rose higher pouring water into the living room and she had to retreat to the second floor. A police motorboat came by and saw her at the window. "We will come up and rescue you!" they shouted. But she refused, waving them off saying, "Use your time to save someone else! I have faith that God will save me!"

The flood waters rose higher and higher and Mrs. Murphy had to climb up onto the roof.

A helicopter spotted her and dropped a rope ladder. "Climb the ladder and we will take you to safety!" But she still refused, "No thank you! God will save me!"

Shortly after, the floodwaters swept Mrs. Murphy away and she drowned.

So she goes to Heaven, stands before God and is pissed! "I put all of my faith in you. Why didn't you come and save me?"

And God looked puzzled, saying, "I sent you a warning. I sent you a car. I sent you a canoe. I sent you a motorboat. I sent you a helicopter. What more do you want?"

progressoid

(49,952 posts)
94. Here's how I heard that "joke".
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 12:49 PM
Mar 2014

A terrible storm came into a town and local officials sent out an emergency warning that the riverbanks would soon overflow and flood the nearby homes. They ordered everyone in the town to evacuate immediately. Mrs. Murphy, a faithful Christian, heard the warning and decided to stay, saying to herself, "I will trust God and if I am in danger, then God will send a miracle to save me."

The neighbors came by her house and said, "We're leaving and there is room for you in our car, please come with us!" But Mrs. Murphy declined. "I have faith that God will save me."

As she stood on the porch watching the water rise up the steps, a man in a canoe paddled by and called , "Hurry and come into my canoe, the waters are rising quickly!" But she again said, "No thanks, God will save me."

The floodwaters rose higher pouring water into the living room and she had to retreat to the second floor. A police motorboat came by and saw her at the window. "We will come up and rescue you!" they shouted. But she refused, waving them off saying, "Use your time to save someone else! I have faith that God will save me!"

The flood waters rose higher and higher and Mrs. Murphy had to climb up onto the roof.

A helicopter spotted her and dropped a rope ladder. "Climb the ladder and we will take you to safety!" But she still refused, "No thank you! God will save me!"

Shortly after, the floodwaters swept Mrs. Murphy away and she drowned.

The end.


Dorian Gray

(13,479 posts)
87. While I agree that those parents
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 07:12 AM
Mar 2014

need to be held accountable (and it is a great evil to allow children to suffer for the belief of the parents), I doubt that many of them are Roman Catholics. There is nothing in our theology that prevents medical intervention.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
12. I'm accusing a religious leader of hypocrisy for how he speaks of wealth
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 01:16 PM
Mar 2014

And pointing out that his calls for prayers don't merit any praise for him, given how effective they ever are.

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
24. No, he is not being hypocritical.
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 03:53 PM
Mar 2014

You dislike him, simply because he is a believer, as you apparently dislike all believers because they are believers.

Anyway, someone as fundamentally dishonest as you should not be whinging about anyone else's hypocrisy.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
28. Oh, you're doing a fine job all by yourself, trotsky.
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 06:23 PM
Mar 2014

You just keep sitting there in the bleachers tossing shit bombs whenever the level of disruption falls below the level you seek.

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
35. One of the main things a Christian is obliged to do is tell the truth
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:14 PM
Mar 2014

And calling skepticscott dishonest is not an insult, it is a statement of demonstrated fact. He accused me of being a liar when I said he was an unbeliever. I was responding to his statement in http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218114774#post24

So yeah, we're entirely justified in asking for evidence to back up their claims of the existence of a god.


Note the word "we". Clearly, he is at least giving the strong implication that he does not believe in God, or else that sentence simply does not make sense. At worst, I might be accused of misconstruing what he said, but there is nothing to support his accusation that I lied.



Response to trotsky (Reply #27)

shenmue

(38,506 posts)
51. Uh, calling people fucking imbeciles is a great way to win people to your cause
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 03:13 PM
Mar 2014


If you just like to be a shit-disturber for its own sake, say so. Don't try and hide behind the idea of being a better person than someone else. Because you're not.
 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
52. You could learn a little
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 03:40 PM
Mar 2014

about the history of FA in this forum before you make you final judgement.

And he didn't say "fucking imbeciles." Just "imbeciles."

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
30. I dislike him because he champions bigotry
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 09:42 PM
Mar 2014

He leads a sexist, homophobic, bigoted organization, as all progressives worthy of the name recognize, and he supports those bigoted and disgraceful doctrines wholeheartedly, and welcomes and supports their imposition on everyone as law.

I know you're fine with all that and think he's wonderful, but that's just you.

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
36. The actual hypocrite is you, skepticscott
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:14 PM
Mar 2014

Given your blatant bigotry against religion.

Are you going to go whinging to the moderators because I called you a bigot? If so, all I can say is that you practice the logical fallacy of Special Pleading -- it's OK when you do it, it's bad when other people do it.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
37. I'm not even going to go whining to the moderators
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:22 PM
Mar 2014

That's your bag, as we've seen.

And you have yet to point to a single post of mine that shows either bigotry or hypocrisy. Calling out bigotry among the religious is not bigotry, except to right wing fundamentalists, and even if it were, I'd still point out sexism and homophobia where it's preached and practiced. And hypocrisy consists in saying one thing and believing or practicing another. You have many examples of me doing that, I suppose?

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,473 posts)
48. I have exactly ONCE complained about a post directed at me.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 12:40 PM
Mar 2014

That was when someone called me a "drooling mouthed, bigoted moron". So take your "That's your bag" and shove it.

I'm sorry your reading ability is so poor. It should be obvious that calling the Pope a hy7pocrite and a bigot is nothing more than hypocritical bigotry on your part. It's somewhat funny -- I could actually make your case better than you can. That's because I am extremely familiar with the history of Christianity in general and the Roman Catholic Church in particular. I have, in fact, posted repeatedly on some of what I see wrong with the Catholic Church, for example, at http://www.democraticunderground.com/1221591 (note: I wrote that during the papacy of Benedict XVI, who was then "the current Pope", with "the previous Pope" being John Paul II).

You, on the other hand, just whinge.

EvilAL

(1,437 posts)
97. What is funny is that
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 04:18 PM
Mar 2014

even though he can't do anything other than pray for the people, if the situation gets resolved without too much carnage he'll say that the prayers either helped or were the reason it was resolved.

Dorian Gray

(13,479 posts)
88. They do.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 07:16 AM
Mar 2014

It's true. I like to think that calling for prayers is also acknowledging the problems and helping make the world aware of the problems. More international awareness puts Russia under a microscope. That puts pressure on them to act less aggressively (in theory).

His calling attention to the matter can't hurt.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
14. A little juxtaposition for your Monday consideration
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 01:32 PM
Mar 2014

The Pope's words:

But in reality he underlined, these words are more present than ever because they remind us that we cannot serve two masters: God and wealth. As long as everyone tries to accumulate for themselves Pope Francis added, there will never be justice.


The Pope chillin' in his crib with his friends:



So if it were Mitt Romney making the quotation above would we all be gushing over him and his concern for the poor?
 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
18. Please, then
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 02:25 PM
Mar 2014

show me a picture of the squalor he lives in. And show me how where he lives doesn't feed exactly in to what he said in the OP.

And for the record, he does live in Vatican City where both of those pictures were taken. That's the wealth the RCC has amassed.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
32. And a bed!
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:39 AM
Mar 2014

He should be sleeping on the floor on a tattered and motheaten old quilt, just like his critics in this group do.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
23. OK, fine.
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 03:50 PM
Mar 2014

Apparently we are pretending that the RCC is not sitting on a shit load of wealth and that the pope, while talking about the evils of accumulating wealth, doesn't live in lavish wealth himself.

Carry on, then.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
31. Which is why I accused him
Mon Mar 3, 2014, 09:44 PM
Mar 2014

of hypocrisy. Some posters here are too clueless and brainwashed to comprehend why he's guilty.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
101. As the member of the Jesuits he took a vow of poverty. That means he
Fri Mar 7, 2014, 12:46 AM
Mar 2014

can own very little, basically just what he needs. The wealth of the Church as an institution is not his or any Popes for that matter although they can have individual wealth. This one cannot because of his vow of poverty. Yet, I see this lie perpetuated here over and over.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
33. Oh, please.
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 02:57 AM
Mar 2014

He has a small bedroom and a slightly larger study. That looks like "lavish wealth" to you?

Carry on, yourself. Keep all that righteous indignation going strong.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
34. So we are ignoring Vatican City?
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 10:37 AM
Mar 2014

At a time when Pope Francis is talking about not being able to follow both God and money and says that the accumulation of wealt is a bad thing, we are going to just give him a pass on the insane amount of wealth the RCC has accumulated.

You must be dizzy from how much you have to spin this one to make it look like he's not a hypocrite here.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
43. So you think all of Vatican City
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 10:03 PM
Mar 2014

constitutes Francis' personal wealth?

Aaaaalllllllrighty, then. Tell us again about your Catholic high school--and how much of it you slept through.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
44. When did I say that?
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 10:11 PM
Mar 2014

I thought it was pretty clear that I was saying it was hypocritical of a guy that is the head of a wealth accumulating organization to say that wealth accumulation is a bad thing.

But your strawman makes me look silly so I'm sure you'll stick with that.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
80. See your posts 14 and 16.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 12:34 AM
Mar 2014

You make you look silly. If you weren't so intent on toeing the party line, you might trip yourself up less often.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
90. You claimed I said the Vatican City was the Pope's personal property
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:05 AM
Mar 2014

My post 14 says the following:

The Pope chillin' in his crib with his friends:


Don't say it's his personal property in that post. Are you claiming he doesn't live in and have control over Vatican City which contains the church in the picture?

My post 16 says the following:

You're right. His place is pretty austere


Again, don't say it is his personal property. It's "his place." That's pretty accurate. Do you think he needs to phone ahead and make reservations to look out that window or do you think he can just go there? He's the fucking Pope. That's his place.

So I await your apology for your lies about me saying the Vatican City was the Pope's personal property. I would also like an acknowledgment that when he spoke as the head of a church telling people that accumulation of wealth was the root of many problems that he was being a hypocrite because his organization has accumulated a shitload of wealth. I'm sure I will get neither.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
98. What do you think "his" and "has" mean,
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 07:18 PM
Mar 2014

other than ownership?

Your whole complaint on the wealth of the Church implies that the Pope could dispose of it at will. That constitutes power equivalent to ownership--and it's a power he doesn't have.

"Lies about you?" Oh, you poor thing. You're sounding more and more like one of your colleagues.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
99. Is it not his place?
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 08:44 PM
Mar 2014

Does he not live there? Is he not the CEO on 'roids of that organization?

He could start the process to sell off their evil accumulation of wealth and use the money to help the poor and oppressed. Yes, he could do that. He does have that power.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
49. No, it constitutes but a fraction of the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church...
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 03:02 PM
Mar 2014

...of which Papa Frank is the uncontested, second-to-none, infallible, supreme fucking leader.

Please proceed.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
86. Best Pope ever
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 07:01 AM
Mar 2014

Good for the Pope bringing attention to Ukraine especially on Ash Wednesday. An inspiration to all.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
91. How is he different from the last pope.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:06 AM
Mar 2014

I mean, yeah, he has better PR and seems like he's less of an asshole in public, but how is his stance on anything different from the last guy. Or last guys. It's not. But, hey, keep hope alive.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
92. seems like he's less of an asshole in public,
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:18 AM
Mar 2014

That alone is refreshing. I was a bit over the top with my previous post. Just being funny. However, I do think this Pope at least is trying to bring people together. Heck just yesterday he said that Civil Unions would not be a problem. I mean he is changing even faster than President Obama.....not really, but after civil unions comes marriage. The only shame in all of this is that he is around 78. I wish he was 20 years younger because I think we would see a very different Catholic Church. I am Catholic and so far I really like what he is saying and yes results are needed as well.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
93. I'll give you that.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:30 AM
Mar 2014

I wish he didn't hate Liberation Theology and didn't fight it so hard in Argentina. Personally, I think the civil unions thing is good but feels like smoke and mirrors because in the same statement he reaffirmed that marriage is between a man and woman which indicate, to me anyway, that he isn't planning on changing the church stance at all. It's still a sin and it won't be a sacrament same-sex couples will ever get. He just said it was OK for governments to consider it.

The most interesting part in that interview was the birth control issue. That seemed the closest to being a statement that the church may actually budge a little bit on it. I doubt that it will be a "hey, go nuts and use birth control all you want" but this issue, unlike gay marriage, seems like an issue that would change over time.

I was raised in a very observant, strict Catholic house. Went to high school at a Catholic Seminary and considered the priesthood very seriously during high school. Have many close friends that are priest both for a diocese and for orders. My religious views have come very far since then, but I still look very fondly at that time of my life and would not change a thing.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
39. There is contradictory data about this whole prayer/surgical patient thing, and
Tue Mar 4, 2014, 04:26 PM
Mar 2014

I think there are just too many variables for it to be taken as conclusive.

At best, I think it doesn't hurt but probably doesn't help.

Anyway, your post is funny, I will give you that.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
57. No, it isn't
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 04:11 PM
Mar 2014

Only 5.9% of Ukrainians are Catholic. More than 60% are non-religious or don't care enough to belong to a church.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
59. That may be in large part to an extensive recent history of serious persecution for being religious.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 04:16 PM
Mar 2014

Hard to know where people actually stand under those conditions.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
61. I don't understand where you're trying to go with this
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 05:04 PM
Mar 2014

Let's assume these numbers -- taken 18 years after Glasnost and Perestroika -- are not wholly representative of the Ukrainian people. Should we assume they want the prayers of a religious institution which has remained largely irrelevant for the entirety of their nation's history? That they want prayers at all?

For the record, I understand the well-meaning intent behind offering people prayers, but if Russian troops ever invade Detroit, everyone can keep their prayers. Send lawyers, guns, and money.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
62. All I am saying is that it went from a very religious country to a very non-religious
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 05:13 PM
Mar 2014

country, primarily due to government imposed sanctions and persecution.

That would make it difficult to ascertain how accurate recent numbers might be concerning religiosity.

The numbers you quote may be entirely accurate or may still reflect events from the relatively recent past.

They are also 8 years old and it would be interesting to see if there has been a change or if there are any trends.

There is also a 2003 study by the same group that found that 75% of Ukrainians believe in god, so that 62.5% who report being nonreligious or not belonging to a specific church may be mostly in the second category.

They may not want or benefit from prayers, but they certainly could benefit from more people paying attention, which this might encourage.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
67. I would argue that is something of an oversimplification
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 11:19 PM
Mar 2014

Yes, Soviet-era policies towards religion were repressive, but it is my understanding Ukraine got off relatively easy, especially in the latter half of the 20th century. The Russian Orthodox church, to which Ukraine has historically belonged, was the most tolerated religion in the USSR, and Ukraine saw fewer churches closed than any other region. While I wouldn't argue Ukrainian believers had it easy, I would argue they had it easier than other religious groups which have rebounded since the end of the Cold War.

And there are other factors I think would lead to an overall downturn in Ukrainian religiosity; first and foremost the politicization of the Russian Orthodox church in that country. The two most populous sects, those following either the Russian of Kievan Patriarchs, are split across party lines. In a country where faith in the resident political parties is measurably low, it would be easy to understand if a sizable portion of the population would be ill-inclined to hear political endorsements from the pulpit.

There's also the matter of at least half of the country wanting to move in a more Eurocentric direction. If Ukrainians look up to or are otherwise trying to emulate their western European neighbors, then their lack of religiosity would likewise make a great deal of sense.

Then, there's the simple cynicism that invariably accompanies a corrupt society. With both branches of the Orthodoxy being in bed with the politicians, it is easy to see the religion as being part of the problem.

I don't think there's enough evidence to say one way or the other how Ukraine wound up where it is, religiously.

At any rate, the point I was trying to make to hrmjustin isn't that prayer would necessarily go unappreciated, or is universally worthless (I am willing to concede that in an indirect, raising awareness kind of sense, it may or may not be somewhat beneficial), but that not everyone wants to hear that kind of thing, least of all when the chips are down. One should never assume the old "I'll pray for you" line will be well-received, and, just as a matter of courtesy, one should be mindful of that.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
66. supprression of christianity stopped almost entirely at the start of WWII.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 11:01 PM
Mar 2014

That was more than 70 years ago. So your claim here is that the 20 or so years of suppression starting 90 years ago accounts for the vast lack of religiosity of the region. Interesting claim.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
64. Where did you get that?
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 07:54 PM
Mar 2014
Religions: Ukrainian Orthodox - Kyiv Patriarchate 50.4%, Ukrainian Orthodox - Moscow Patriarchate 26.1%, Ukrainian Greek Catholic 8%, Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox 7.2%, Roman Catholic 2.2%, Protestant 2.2%, Jewish 0.6%, other 3.2% (2006 est.)

Definition: This entry is an ordered listing of religions by adherents starting with the largest group and sometimes includes the percent of total population.

Source: CIA World Factbook - Unless otherwise noted, information in this page is accurate as of December 6, 2013


http://www.indexmundi.com/ukraine/religions.html
 

mr blur

(7,753 posts)
53. Well, that will make some people feel much better about doing nothing.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 03:41 PM
Mar 2014

I'm sure nothing influences Putin more than a load of people talking to themselves. Still, if it makes you feel you're helping...

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
56. The pope shining light on the situation is doing something.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 04:06 PM
Mar 2014

Whether prayer actually has an effect or not is questionable, but asking people to pay attention and to learn more about the situation is certainly a positive thing, don't you think?

What are any of us doing? Most people are just ignoring the whole thing. At least those that pray are giving it some thought.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
63. "asking people to pay attention and to learn more about the situation is certainly a positive thing"
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 05:22 PM
Mar 2014

It certainly is. So let's ask them to pay attention and learn more about the situation, instead of asking them to pray for Ukraine. Prayer doesn't necessarily require the supplicant to learn a damn thing about the situation.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
73. Yes but most of us are not in the position to do that level of work.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 12:21 AM
Mar 2014

So the rest of us can do other positive things such as prayer.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
74. Whether they are "positive" is unproven.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 12:23 AM
Mar 2014

The only evidence we have suggests that intercessory prayer is neutral at best, and detrimental at worst (if the people who are being prayed for know it).

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
76. Yes, I am aware that facts are irrelevant to religious belief.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 12:26 AM
Mar 2014

Fred Phelps, Pat Robertson, and their ilk prove that on a daily basis.

Just as you and your beliefs are unaffected by evidence, so are theirs.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
78. Then don't dismiss evidence so willfully as they do.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 12:31 AM
Mar 2014

"If science proves some belief of Buddhism wrong, then Buddhism will have to change." -The Dalai Lama

Despite my reservations about the Dalai Lama, I think many religious believers would really benefit from heeding that quote and the advice therein. By reserving the right to deny any evidence that contradicts your beliefs, you empower other believers to dismiss evidence they don't like either.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
79. I and other believers will not stop praying for people because if one study.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 12:33 AM
Mar 2014

Sorry won't happen.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
81. Nor will Fred Phelps stop hating gays...
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 12:35 AM
Mar 2014

despite the studies showing homosexuality's link to genetics.

I pray one day you understand how those things are connected.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
83. If you reserve the right to reject any evidence that contradicts your beliefs,
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 12:39 AM
Mar 2014

then why can't he do the same?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
68. Learning about the situation itself does nothing.
Wed Mar 5, 2014, 11:28 PM
Mar 2014

Nor does it express concern for the human beings in that situation.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
85. In politics, this is called jawboning.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 01:29 AM
Mar 2014

He's using the power of his office to call attention to the precarious position of Ukraine and its people. There's likely diplomacy going on behind the scenes. No one except Putin wants a reprise of Hungary abd Czechoslovakia.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
96. Oh, of course, that's EXACTLY what others are saying.
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 01:33 PM
Mar 2014

Way to keep that level of discourse high, cbayer.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
100. And if the tanks do roll in,
Thu Mar 6, 2014, 11:46 PM
Mar 2014

it will be totally his fault because he didn't sell off the Apollo Belvedere to some gazillionaire to park by his swimming pool.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Pope Francis appeals for ...