Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumA Win for Gay Rights Over “Religious Liberty” in New York State
If you find this offensive, you probably shouldn't start a business hosting weddings. (Photo by YOSHIKAZU TSUNO/AFP/Getty Images)
Aug. 18 2014 12:33 PM
By Mark Joseph Stern
At the heart of the so-called religious liberty debate lies a very simple question: Do religious people, mainly Christians, hold a special right to defy anti-discrimination ordinances and refuse service to certain people based on their identity?
In a firm and momentous decision, the New York State Division of Human Rights has now answered that question with a resounding no. The division recently heard the case of Melisa Erwin and Jennifer McCarthy, a lesbian couple who hoped to marry at Liberty Ridge Farm, a wedding venue in Schaghticoke, New York. But Liberty Ridges owners, Cynthia and Robert Gifford, denied their request due to their sexual orientation.
The Giffords later claimed that it was their right to refuse service to Erwin and McCarthy. But in fact, their actions were plainly illegal. New York state law bars places of public accommodation from discriminating based on sexual orientationand the Giffords were quite honest about their reasons for turning away Erwin and McCarthy. As a result, the Giffords must pay a $10,000 fine for violating the law, plus $1,500 to both Erwin and McCarthy for mental pain and suffering.
Whats so important about the divisions decision, aside from the central holding, which is fair-minded and correct, is that it neatly peels away the myriad rationalizations and pretexts behind the religious liberty to discriminate. In an area of the law that can get soggy with abstract theories, facts matter a great dealand the division finds plenty of them. During legal proceedings, Liberty Ridge tried to rebrand itself as a distinctly private establishment, a kind of members-only club open only to a select few. Not so, held the division:
(Liberty Ridge Farms) is a for profit business and directs its publicity to the general public.
LRF engages in widespread marketing to the general public through advertising at a bridal show and on the internet
LRF is encouraging members of the public to lease the use of its facilities and purchase its services. Thus, there is no exclusivity and LRF is not distinctly private.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2014/08/18/gay_rights_triumph_over_false_religious_liberty_in_new_york_state.html
http://www.capitalnewyork.com/sites/default/files/140808_DHR_LRF_Ruling.pdf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 834 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Win for Gay Rights Over “Religious Liberty” in New York State (Original Post)
rug
Aug 2014
OP
pinto
(106,886 posts)1. +1 Well thought out decision, imo.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)2. Equality means just that.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)3. Excellent decision. We need more push back in this direction.