Religion
Related: About this forumNo Revolution Without Religion
Happy May Day everybody!
http://killingthebuddha.com/mag/damnation/no-revolution-without-religion/
by Nathan Schneider
Why the Occupy movement needs to Occupy faith.
There was a flash of wisdom in Occupy Wall Streets controversial and otherwise unsuccessful attempt to occupy a plot of land owned by Trinity Church on December 17 of last year: if the movement is going to last much longer, it is going to have to occupy, and be supported by, faith. By faith I mean religionthe more organized the better. Hey, church, one could almost hear the Occupiers saying, as they mounted the giant yellow ladder over the fence and dropped down on the other side, act like a church. And, this being just a month after the eviction from Zuccotti Park, We need you.
The Occupy movement has been largely a white, urban phenomenon, and one with a bit of a tendency toward vanguardism, which makes it not entirely surprising that its often blind to the fact that there is no force more potentially revolutionary in U.S. history or in the country today than religion. But the movement remains oblivious to this fact at its own peril. You who are blind, see.
On the other side of the Atlantic, left intellectuals have been starting to discover what they have to learn from religion about revolution. Slavoj Zizek, Alain Badiou, and Giorgio Agamben have all written about the apostle Paul in recent years: he stood at the intersection of Judaism and Christianity and was the architect of an underground movement that eventually subsumed the Roman Empire. During the early days on Liberty Plaza, actually, I felt like I was witnessing a glimpse of how Paul described his early church: the holding of all things in common, a single-minded asceticism, and local cells miraculously spreading throughout the known world. Living in societies far less religious than ours, thinkers on the European left are realizing that the loss of religious imagination can mean losing the capacity to imagine and take steps toward a radically different kind of society.
Its hard to think of anyplace where religions revolutionary potential has been more fully realized than the United Statesboth for good and for evil. Many activists nowadays assume the completely non-empirical notion that religion in this country today is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Republican Party. But this impression is the result of a very temporary and partialif singularly effectivealliance forged at the onset of the Reagan era. This alliance need not last. American religion is nothing if not finicky with regard to politics, and highly troublesome to those in power.
more at link.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Lionessa
(3,894 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)&feature=related
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)So I guess I don't really care at all if there is no revolution without religion.
There is certainly no hope for evolution of society without compassion. But does compassion require religion? It seems to me that not only does it not, but that religion, with it's obsession with the metaphysical, inhibits compassion in the real world.