The looming conflict between Trumps immigration sweeps and religious freedom

[rug]

By Philip Bump
February 12 at 9:00 AM

When Guadalupe García de Rayos was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Mesa, Ariz., after the most recent of her mandated check-ins with the agency, her lawyer, Ray Ybarra Maldonado, was furious. On a conference call, Maldonado said that ICE had lied to him and that he would advise anyone in Rayos’s shoes to seek sanctuary in a church instead of turning themselves in.

Rayos considered that option. Understanding that the check-in might pose a new risk during the Trump administration, allies suggested that she do so. She declined, opting instead for going to Mass and praying before she went to the ICE office.

She was deported to Mexico, leaving her two children behind.

Seeking sanctuary at a church would not have offered as much shelter as you might assume. Many of us are familiar — thanks to “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” — with the concept of taking refuge in a place of worship as a way to avoid civil authorities. While this was a doctrine that existed in some places in the past, it was never instituted by American colonists, and it is not the case now that someone hoping to avoid arrest can be assured of protection in a house of worship. (Nor is it the case that “sanctuary cities” offer protection from detention by federal immigration authorities, as recent raids have made clear.)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/02/12/the-looming-conflict-between-trumps-immigration-sweeps-and-religious-freedom/?utm_term=.0b34b854961f

[guillaumeb]

1. The right wing agenda in 2 parts:

One:
Frighten people.

Two:
Give them someone to be frightened of.


US history shows that this tactic generally works, especially in times of economic hardship.