Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Heddi

(18,312 posts)
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 04:36 PM Mar 2017

(South Dakota) State house passes protections for religious adoption agencies

https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2017/03/03/house-passes-protections-religious-adoption-agencies/

PIERRE - The South Dakota House approved new legal protections Thursday for adoption agencies and foster groups that cite religious reasons for denying services, such as refusing to place children in the care of same-sex couples or single parents.

..
Supporters say they want to guard agencies from losing state funds or licenses for not working with people of different religions or couples in a same-sex marriage.
There have been concerns across the U.S. regarding local ordinances or state laws that have impacted child placement agencies, said Republican Rep. Steven Haugaard, the bill’s main House sponsor.
Haugaard said that the bill is “proactive and pre-emptive” to recognize that religious agencies “can exercise their faith, and it’s not going to impact or negatively affect the good work that they’ve done for decades.”

...
Jim Kinyon, executive director of Catholic Social Services in Rapid City, which provides adoption services, said the group relies on its religious traditions to help make some decisions on families to place on its infant adoption list. That includes requirements that an opposite-sex couple has been married for at least two years.
“I would prefer not to have Catholic organizations driven out of the practice of placing children for adoption,” Kinyon said. “That’s why we proposed the bill, and that’s why we supported the bill.”

.-------

At least they've got the children's best interests in mind, amirite?? Better to languish in foster care than *gasp* be raised by a bunch of gays or lesbians or single parents. I mean, what would jesus do?
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(South Dakota) State house passes protections for religious adoption agencies (Original Post) Heddi Mar 2017 OP
So, what they are saying is they are going to willingly deprive Doreen Mar 2017 #1

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
1. So, what they are saying is they are going to willingly deprive
Mon Mar 6, 2017, 04:49 PM
Mar 2017

children from having loving parents who can give them an opportunity in life instead of living off the government getting only the absolute bare minimum to survive?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»(South Dakota) State hous...