Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumTHE RELIGIOUS ORIGINS OF FAKE NEWS AND ALTERNATIVE FACTS
http://religiondispatches.org/the-religious-origins-of-fake-news-and-alternative-facts/Perhaps one of the strangest instances of fake news that proliferated in the final months of the 2016 election was the conspiracy known as Pizzagate. Supposedly, a D.C. restaurant housed a pedophilia ring involving members of the Democratic Party, including Hillary Clintons campaign manager, John Podesta. Podestas emailsreleased by WikiLeaks, and probably hacked by Russiarevealed phrases like cheese pizza and other code words for child sex-trafficking. Hillary Clinton herself may have been involved. The ring seemed to include Satanic rituals. The Clinton campaign was engaged, on the side, with running a child sex-trafficking business.
...
Weve tried to do similar things to liberals. It just has never worked, it never takes off. Youll get debunked within the first two comments, and then the whole thing just kind of fizzles out.) What is it about Republicans that seems to make them more credulous to fake news than Democrats?
The answer to this question might have to do with the religious roots of todays Republican Party in the Christian Right. Beginning with the Moral Majority, founded in 1979 by Jerry Falwell and Tim LaHaye, and continuing through church organizations such as Pat Robertsons Christian Coalition and James Dobsons Focus on the Family, conservative Christians have helped reshape the Republican Party and its policies. Its family values positions on abortion, the sexual revolution, gender roles, pornography, and homosexuality have been heavily influenced by its conservative Christian theology.
...
The historical-critical method of Bible scholarship meanwhile threatened the idea of scripture as the inerrant, uniform word of God. There were multiple authors and editors of scripture, scholars began to demonstrate, sometimes with incompatible stories and contradictory theologies. The New Testaments gospels, this scholarship showed, were not composed shortly after Jesus death by his eyewitness disciples like Matthew and John. Rather, they were written accounts based on oral traditions and other now-lost writings, composed decades after Jesuss deathwith all the attendant problems of memory and record-keeping that entails.
Fundamentalist Christians rejected these accounts. But more importantly, fundamentalists critiqued the methods, assumptions, and institutions of the expert elites. Fundamentalists questioned the biologists and Bible scholars suspension of the question of Gods supernatural intervention. They rejected the secular university as a site of neutral science and objective scholarship. And they didnt just question the ideas and conclusions of the secular world and its institutions of knowledge. In a form of resistance, they adapted modern institutions and technologies to create bodies of counter-expertise.
Christian fundamentalist Bible colleges and universities, publishers and bookstores, newspapers and magazines, radio and then television shows, museums and campus ministries, together formed a set of institutions that resisted elite, secular expert knowledge. Recognizing the power of expertises infrastructure, Christian fundamentalists created this counter-infrastructure to cultivate and curate its alternative forms of knowledge. This alternative knowledgethe forerunner of todays alternative facts took the form of creationism and an alternative Bible scholarship demonstrating the Bibles inerrancy and traditional authorship.
/...
n the following years, the areas of rejected expert knowledge has grown to include climate change, the efficacy of abstinence-only sex education, and even the supposed link between vaccinations and autism. One could make the argument that even issues that dont appear to have any religious resonance at allsuch as the efficacy of supply-side economic policies, or the idea that Saddam Hussein had Weapons of Mass Destruction and ties to Al Qaedaare likewise successful partly because of this conservative cognitive training in the rejection of mainstream media and the cultivation of other sources of information, like Fox News at first, but also now websites like Breitbart, 4chan, Infowars, and others.
...
The truth is that millions of non-fundamentalist Christians believe in evolution and the historical-critical method of Bible scholarship, and there are lots of practicing Christian scholars pursuing research in both those fields! But there are essentially no non-Christians who do creation science or believe in the literal Genesis account of creation, and there are essentially no non-Christian scholars who believe the Bible is inerrant and that the authors of the four Gospels (who never identify themselves) are the actual people Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
..
Its past time for us to consider the possibility that the God gap in partisan religiosity is linked to the asymmetry of whether and how voters consume fake news. Akin to William F. Buckley standing athwart history and yelling stop, the sister conservatism of Christian fundamentalism has stood athwart modern knowledge and yelled NO. In cultivating alternative sources and alternative ideas, Christian fundamentalists laid the ground for the fake news to come.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 3024 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
THE RELIGIOUS ORIGINS OF FAKE NEWS AND ALTERNATIVE FACTS (Original Post)
Heddi
Mar 2017
OP
Seems plausible. I created a thread recently about Republican willingness to lie. n/t
Buckeye_Democrat
Mar 2017
#2
trotsky
(49,533 posts)1. Religion conditions people to accept ideas without proof.
In fact, it many cases, it argues for the *superiority* of ideas that have no proof.
It should be no surprise religion and fake news are connected.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)2. Seems plausible. I created a thread recently about Republican willingness to lie. n/t
Cartoonist
(7,316 posts)3. Religion IS fake news.
Only it's not new.
NeoGreen
(4,031 posts)4. Religion: The Original...