Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumThe Shack Sparks Controversy Among Faithful
http://www.lifezette.com/faithzette/the-shack-sparks-controversy-among-faithful/The Shack Sparks Controversy Among Faithful
Here's why the new film, based on the book, is startling religious audiences across the nation
..
Now Youngs best-selling book The Shack is completing its decade-long journey from the page to the screen in a Hollywood film that opened this weekend (March 3), starring Octavia Spencer and Sam Worthington.
Sparking Controversy. It also raised controversy in some evangelical Christian circles. R. Albert Mohler Jr., president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, wrote in a 2010 blog post that the books dialogues between Mack and God reveal a theology that is unconventional at best, and undoubtedly heretical in certain respects.
Mohler accused Young of universal reconciliation, or the belief that the death and resurrection of Jesus has reconciled all of creation to God.
..
In December, after the movie trailer was released, Joe Schimmel, a pastor and host of the documentary Hollywoods War on God, told Christian News Network that the depiction in The Shack of God as Papa, a motherly black woman, and Sarayu, an Asian woman who is a gardener, lends itself to a dangerous and false image of God and idolatry. Schimmel did not comment in the article on the portrayal of Jesus as a Jewish man.
----
OMG GOD IS A WOMAN? OF COLOR?? how outrageously offensive
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1480 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Shack Sparks Controversy Among Faithful (Original Post)
Heddi
Mar 2017
OP
Heddi
(18,312 posts)1. 'The Shack' Makes 'Divine' Box Office Debut; Christians Warn of Portraying God as Woman Read more at
http://www.christianpost.com/news/the-shack-makes-divine-box-office-debut-christians-warn-of-portraying-god-as-woman-176768/
"The Shack" exceeded box office expectations in its premier weekend with one of the best openings for a faith-based film. But as moviegoers watch a woman play God on the big screen, some Christians want to clarify whether they should be more "inclusive" or "gender-blended" when referring to God.
..
Reinke made it clear that God is spirit and not a sexual or biological being. Though there are instances throughout Scripture where feminine imagery such as giving birth or nursing a child is used to describe God's actions or character, Reinke argued that when it comes to titles, feminine ones are never used in referencing God.
"That explains why in Scripture we find many masculine titles for God: Lord, Father, King, Judge, Savior, Ruler, Warrior, Shepherd, Husband, and even a handful of metaphorical masculine titles like Rock, Fortress, and Shield. While feminine titles for God Queen, Lady, Mother, and Daughter are never used," he wrote.
Nevertheless, God revealed himself with masculine titles, Reinke stressed, and Christians should "receive those titles by faith because, in the words of theologian Bruce Waltke, 'It is inexcusable hubris and idolatry on the part of mortals to change the images by which the eternal God chooses to represent himself' (Old Testament Theology, 244)."
"The Shack" exceeded box office expectations in its premier weekend with one of the best openings for a faith-based film. But as moviegoers watch a woman play God on the big screen, some Christians want to clarify whether they should be more "inclusive" or "gender-blended" when referring to God.
..
Reinke made it clear that God is spirit and not a sexual or biological being. Though there are instances throughout Scripture where feminine imagery such as giving birth or nursing a child is used to describe God's actions or character, Reinke argued that when it comes to titles, feminine ones are never used in referencing God.
"That explains why in Scripture we find many masculine titles for God: Lord, Father, King, Judge, Savior, Ruler, Warrior, Shepherd, Husband, and even a handful of metaphorical masculine titles like Rock, Fortress, and Shield. While feminine titles for God Queen, Lady, Mother, and Daughter are never used," he wrote.
Nevertheless, God revealed himself with masculine titles, Reinke stressed, and Christians should "receive those titles by faith because, in the words of theologian Bruce Waltke, 'It is inexcusable hubris and idolatry on the part of mortals to change the images by which the eternal God chooses to represent himself' (Old Testament Theology, 244)."
ymetca
(1,182 posts)2. "Who owns the Jesus property?"
My favorite quote from Timothy Leary.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)3. I have read the book .............. a unique way to look at god
What I find interesting is that most christians say they do not understand god but believe in him .......... fine
HOWEVER, if you claim to not understand how do you know what can not be??
trotsky
(49,533 posts)4. Anything that pisses off the fundies is good by me. n/t
edhopper
(33,479 posts)5. what if
Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)6. God is a man.
He looks like George Burns. The Bible tells me so.