Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 02:05 PM Mar 2017

New case of neonatal herpes caused by Jewish circumcision

http://nypost.com/2017/03/08/new-case-of-neonatal-herpes-caused-by-jewish-circumcision/

The city Health Department has reported a new case of neonatal herpes caused by a controversial ritual Jewish circumcision.

The ancient practice — known as metzitzah b’peh — requires a mohel, the person performing the circumcision, to suck blood from the incision on an infant’s penis.

It has long been linked to neonatal herpes and has consistently raised red flags in the medical community.

The practice continues without restriction in the city after Mayor de Blasio made a pledge to the ­Hasidic community during his 2013 campaign to lift a requirement of written parental consent.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New case of neonatal herpes caused by Jewish circumcision (Original Post) trotsky Mar 2017 OP
Oh boy Heddi Mar 2017 #1
If this were done under ANY OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES... trotsky Mar 2017 #2
I remember the comments about Heddi Mar 2017 #3
I really wish I hadn't read this post. louis-t Mar 2017 #4
I know how you feel. Mariana Mar 2017 #6
This is horrific! hrmjustin Mar 2017 #5
There is it, a beautiful little baby, born in the image of god... A HERETIC I AM Mar 2017 #7

Heddi

(18,312 posts)
1. Oh boy
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 02:13 PM
Mar 2017

I remember last time this was posted...oh the pretzel-twisting logic of why it should be considered ok to have grown men suck the blood from the penises of freshly circumized infants and not, you know, perversion. It was a true sight to behold.

I guess "deeply held religious beliefs" allow adult men to put their mouths on the freshly-circumised penises of infant boys to stop the flow of blood (because there's no other way, apparently, that god would approve of. Had no idea God frowned on bandaids or holding pressure ). And that the spread of neonatal herpes was just how it was, because of these deeply held beliefs. That infants were permanently damaged, and in some cases died was just the price to pay for deeply held beliefs.

And for the alert that I Know will come for daring to criticize these deeply held religious beliefs:

The city Health Department has reported a new case of neonatal herpes caused by a controversial ritual Jewish circumcision.

The ancient practice — known as metzitzah b’peh — requires a mohel, the person performing the circumcision, to suck blood from the incision on an infant’s penis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brit_milah

Metzitzah B'Peh (oral suction)[edit]
The ancient method of performing metzitzah—metzitzah b'peh, or oral suction[37][38]—has become controversial. The process has the mohel place his mouth directly on the circumcision wound to draw blood away from the cut. The majority of Jewish circumcision ceremonies do not use metzitzah b'peh,[39] but some Haredi Jews use it.[40][41][42] It has been documented that the practice poses a serious risk of spreading herpes to the infant.[43][44][45][46] Proponents maintain that there is no conclusive evidence that links herpes to Metzitza,[47] and that attempts to limit this practice infringe on religious freedom.[48][49][50]

http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/features/.premium-1.644138
What is oral suction circumcision, or metzitzah b'peh, and where did it come from?
Though to a small number of observant communities, the practice is routine and normal, to cosmopolitan sophisticates it may seem pretty gruesome. After the mohel cuts off the foreskin, he uses his mouth – oral suction, rather than say a sponge - to effectively clear the wound on the baby's penis of blood, lest it clot and decay.
As for where it arose, metzitzah b'peh is a time-honored tradition codified in the most important Jewish scripts, much like circumcision itself.
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/features/.premium-1.644138

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
2. If this were done under ANY OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES...
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 02:17 PM
Mar 2017

it would be universally condemned and stopped.

Religion somehow makes it not only OK, but grants it special protection.

Heddi

(18,312 posts)
3. I remember the comments about
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 02:19 PM
Mar 2017

how it's pretty sick but, it's religious so we should just let it happen because religion makes it okay for grown adult men to place their mouths on the freshly circumized penises of infant boys, and applying oral suction to stop the flow of blood

FYI -- I'm a nurse. To hasten the clotting of blood, you put pressure, not suction.

Mariana

(14,854 posts)
6. I know how you feel.
Mon Mar 13, 2017, 02:40 PM
Mar 2017

It makes me want to throw up every time I read about a child being harmed by their parents' religious practices. I include the anti vaccination nutcases, too. That bunch has become so much like a cult that it probably should be considered as one.

On the other hand, the more people who know this shit goes on, the more pressure can be put on lawmakers to make disgusting practices like this one the felonies they should be.

A HERETIC I AM

(24,365 posts)
7. There is it, a beautiful little baby, born in the image of god...
Tue Mar 14, 2017, 10:38 AM
Mar 2017

perfect in every way.....


except for that bit on the end of his prick.

That HAS to go. So just bite it off. Yeah. That works.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»New case of neonatal herp...