Religion
Related: About this forumCenturies of progress
Leviticus 25:44-4644 Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.
meanwhile, the religious stand still
Rick Santorum: A child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African American baby born after the election of the USAs first African-American President.
John Hubbard: The institution of slavery that the black race has long believed to be an abomination upon its people may actually have been a blessing in disguise."
Art Robinson: The negroes on a well-ordered estate, under kind masters, were probably a happier class of people than the laborers upon any estate in Europe.
Loy Mauch: "If slavery were so God-awful, why didnt Jesus or Paul condemn it, why was it in the Constitution and why wasnt there a war before 1861?"
rug
(82,333 posts)Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)Still waiting for you or Frank to condemn Leviticus.
rug
(82,333 posts)Still waiting for one of you to acknowledge anti-Catholic bigotry.
Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)but you let Leviticus slide.
Criticizing the Catholic church is not bigotry, it's calling Hate for what it is.
"you let Leviticus slide"
The world is doomed to 2,000 more years of slavery!
Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)I often see slaves standing on street corners selling strawberries. I guess you think that's funny.
rug
(82,333 posts)When did they switch to strawberries?
Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)Immigrants trying to pay their masters for bringing them to America. It gets hot under the sun. Keep laughing in the shade.
rug
(82,333 posts)Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)keep laughing
That calls for outright mockery, not laughter.
So, you've encountered Catholics enslaved by other Catholics selling strawberries on street corners?
It's well documented.
rug
(82,333 posts)Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)They probably harrass them.
rug
(82,333 posts)MineralMan
(146,262 posts)Perhaps some still do. Fortunately, slavery is illegal in most developed countries. Humanism finally eradicated it, regardless of the lingering sentiments of some. It still exists, but not in very many places.
However, some religious people in the United States supported it for quite some time, until they were forced to abandon the practice in the middle of the 19th century. That went down poorly in some parts of this country, and some still wish for it to still be an option.
It's incorrect to say that religions did not support slavery. Obviously, that is not true. The verses being quoted from the Bible are evidence of it. That is too bad, of course, but we humans have not always been enlightened in such matters. We're doing better about that now, although there are still remnants of such views in evidence.
So, yes, religious people have supported slavery, historically, and longer than they have not supported it. That cannot be denied.
rug
(82,333 posts)https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/feb/19/richard-dawkins-disbelief-slave-trade-ancestor
That cannot be denied.
I bet his ancestor was a Christian. At least he provided a lovely estate for his descendants.
Dawkins no more represents atheist than you represent Christians.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Thanks for the proof you didn't read the article.
Cartoonist
(7,309 posts)Whenever the king of deflection has no moral argument to stand on, he trots out Dawkins.
rug
(82,333 posts)Excuse me, today it's enslaved Catholics selling strawberries.