Religion
Related: About this forumGood news: A black church in Boston says it's called to be a sanctuary
Last edited Thu Oct 12, 2017, 05:13 PM - Edit history (1)
From the article:
To read more:
https://www.pri.org/stories/2017-10-10/black-church-boston-says-its-called-be-sanctuary
EDITED TO ADD:
I posted this with the caption "Good news" because I believe that the specific action taken by this particular church is actual good news. I am not stating, nor am I implying, that I agree with every position held by officials of this particular church.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)...Earlier in the year, before marriage became legal for same-sex couples in Massachusetts, the Rev. Gregory G. Groover Sr., an AME pastor in Boston, explained why AME preachers opposed the move. He was quoted in the Boston Globe on Feb. 10, 2004, as saying:
As black preachers, we are progressive in our social consciousness, and in our political ideology as an oppressed people we will often be against the status quo, but our first call is to hear the voice of God in our Scriptures, and where an issue clearly contradicts our understanding of Scripture, we have to apply that understanding.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)He was an advisor with Alliance for Marriage back in 04 and 05. Maybe he's changed. Maybe not. I'll hold back on my applause until this gets clarified.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)But given the substance of this post, and the topic, what do you think of the topic?
Weak attempt at framing.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)You keep using this word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)What about your weak attempt out of severe desperation to find SOMETHING good about religion to post that you're willing to overlook clear and plain bigotry to do so?
You're railing about intolerance on another thread. The definition you gave for it is "unwillingness to accept views, beliefs, or behavior that differ from one's own."
The AME church appears to be quite significantly intolerant. That was a HUGE concern for you in another thread, but it isn't here?
Why the double standard?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)was to help you out because you seemed uncertain about the meaning of the word. And it is not "the definition that you(I) gave for it, it is the actual definition.
And the good news that I posted IS actually good news.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)"I will overlook intolerance when it conveniences me to do so."
Yeah, we know.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)I will rebut that claim. And the claimant has not reiterated the initial erroneous claim.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)"I will beat away on some tertiary quibble to avoid addressing the main idea."
Yeah, we know.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)And it is not a quibble if one poster insists on a different meaning for a word in order to attempt to rebut my use of the word.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)That sound you heard was the utter destruction of every irony meter within a 300-mile radius of your location.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)The rest, not so much.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)You whinge ceaselessly about the intolerance of atheists and yet here you are, praising some sycophantic asshat who campaigned against marriage equality. In Massachusetts, of all places. Explain yourself.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Do you agree, or disagree?
trotsky
(49,533 posts)A simple yes or no question. Please answer "yes" or "no."
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)Please answer.
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,907 posts)Hope this man from El Salvador isn't gay and doesn't want to marry a man, because he may find his sanctuary revoked because Bethel AME is a bunch of fucking bigots.
But, hey, yeah, GOOD NEWS!