Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 02:52 PM Nov 2018

An oldie but a goodie on why militaries should or should not allow religious services

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk/3948329.stm

The British Armed Forces has officially recognised its first registered Satanist, a newspaper reports.

...

Former Tory minister Ann Widdecombe said she was "utterly shocked" by the Royal Navy's decision.

"Satanism is wrong. Obviously the private beliefs of individuals anywhere, including the armed forces, are their own affair but I hope it doesn't spread."

She added: "The Navy should not permit Satanist practices on board its ships.


Just something to think about when pondering religious services for deployed personnel.



20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An oldie but a goodie on why militaries should or should not allow religious services (Original Post) Pope George Ringo II Nov 2018 OP
And a follow up a few years later: Pope George Ringo II Nov 2018 #1
When will there be a Pastafarian chaplain? MineralMan Nov 2018 #2
Except secular humanists. They're not allowed chaplains. Pope George Ringo II Nov 2018 #5
No God; No Chaplain's Insignia MineralMan Nov 2018 #6
He should have claimed to represent the entire Norse pantheon. Pope George Ringo II Nov 2018 #10
Not quite true - I think. TomSlick Nov 2018 #15
Ah, that's true. Major religion, though. MineralMan Nov 2018 #20
As a retired Army JAG, my opinion about chaplains is nuanced. TomSlick Nov 2018 #3
I knew Abe and his wife Rosemary Dale Neiburg Nov 2018 #4
Thank you for the fight! TomSlick Nov 2018 #8
I don't particularly have a problem with military chaplains. Pope George Ringo II Nov 2018 #7
I think I agree. TomSlick Nov 2018 #11
It's complicated, isn't it? Most military chaplains will MineralMan Nov 2018 #9
Great story! TomSlick Nov 2018 #12
At the time, I really had no idea how that got done. MineralMan Nov 2018 #13
You were a pain in the ass, weren't you? TomSlick Nov 2018 #14
They sent me to an intensive Russian language school. MineralMan Nov 2018 #16
In my concerned legal opinion, that book should go unwritten. TomSlick Nov 2018 #17
Nope. Not even 50 years later. MineralMan Nov 2018 #18
Nevertheless. TomSlick Nov 2018 #19

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
1. And a follow up a few years later:
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 02:55 PM
Nov 2018
https://www.forces.net/news/tri-service/satanism-royal-navy

In 2004, it emerged that 24-year-old Naval Technician Chris Cranmer, 24, had been allowed to register by the captain of the now-decommissioned HMS Cumberland - and even to perform Satanic rituals on board.

But being a practising Satanist apparently proved to be no barrier to Mr Cranmer's career prospects.

In 2008, the Daily Record reported that he had been promoted to a job at the Ministry of Defence.

Defence Minister Bob Ainsworth said at the time that Satanists would not be accepted into the Army - but the MoD said individuals of different "religions" are treated on a case-by-case basis.


Apparently the reports of cannibalism in the Royal Navy actually are exaggerated. It does seem to continue to be a problem in the Army, though.

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
2. When will there be a Pastafarian chaplain?
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:01 PM
Nov 2018

or a Wiccan? Equal representation of all religions, I say!

See, all religions have a beneficial effect on society. That's what I read here, anyhow...

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
5. Except secular humanists. They're not allowed chaplains.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:12 PM
Nov 2018
https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2018/03/26/no-atheistchaplains-lawmakers-tell-navy/

Lawmakers are applauding a decision by Navy officials to reject the application of a secular humanist — called an atheist by many — to be a Navy chaplain.

It’s the second time the sea service has declined to accept Jason Heap, who calls himself a “humanist” and and a “non-theist,” into the chaplain corps.

The latest denial of Heap’s application is at the center of a debate on whether or not one who doesn’t believe in a deity can serve as a military chaplain.

Despite the swirling debate around Heap’s beliefs, or lack thereof, no one is denying his qualifications. Heap holds a master’s degree in divinity from Texas Christian University as well as a theological history degree from Oxford.


MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
6. No God; No Chaplain's Insignia
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:19 PM
Nov 2018

That appears to be the rule. "You gots to have a god, see. Get a god and we'll suit you up."

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
10. He should have claimed to represent the entire Norse pantheon.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:23 PM
Nov 2018

That would give him the biggest insignia in the service.

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
15. Not quite true - I think.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 04:39 PM
Nov 2018

There are a very few Buddhist chaplains. My admittedly scant understanding of Buddhism is that it does not include a god.

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
3. As a retired Army JAG, my opinion about chaplains is nuanced.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:04 PM
Nov 2018

I have seen the good that chaplains do for soldiers who are away from home, or are hurting, or just need to talk to someone. On the other hand, the US military must remain neutral on religion. The result is that if there are military people of sufficient numbers of any religion, there ought to me chaplains of that religion. If there aren't chaplains, military folks must be allowed to practice their religion as best they can.

I recall a long conversation with a commanding general about why he had to accommodate a request for a place for Wiccan services. He just couldn't quit saying "witches." It took awhile, but I finally made him understand not only that he had to accommodate the request but that he should.

An image like this one helped.


[link:|




Dale Neiburg

(696 posts)
4. I knew Abe and his wife Rosemary
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:10 PM
Nov 2018

Abe was the first to get the Wiccan pentagram on his marker. It took a long fight, including a demo in Lafayette Square, but in the end we won.

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
8. Thank you for the fight!
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:21 PM
Nov 2018

It was thanks to you and Private Kooiman that I won that argument and the CG did the right thing.

Pope George Ringo II

(1,896 posts)
7. I don't particularly have a problem with military chaplains.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:20 PM
Nov 2018

If there had never been any and the question was starting their inclusion, I'd probably be against that. But there's such a long history of their function at this point that it's really hard to make a powerful argument for terminating the existing service.

And I'm not going to pick a fight with somebody who wants the military to drop them altogether and avoid the military getting involved in that mess. It's not the road I'd choose at this point and I might actually argue it's a mistake, but it's an honest position. And it does have some objections to raise about the military picking which religions do and don't get chaplains.

However, there is a group which wants chaplains only from the "acceptable" sources. I find that somewhat less defensible than either extreme. Every religion has just as much right to their religious services as the holy rollers do to theirs.

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
11. I think I agree.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:28 PM
Nov 2018

There are no "acceptable" religions.

I am very nearly an absolutist on separation of church and state - but chaplains are essential. When I taught Law of War classes as a young JAG, I always told soldiers that if they thought bad stuff was going on, one of their choices was to tell a chaplain. Chaplains - like JAGs - answer to two authorities (no I don't mean God). Both Chaplains and JAGs have "technical chains" outside the chain-of-command up which they can (and must) report bad stuff going on.



MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
9. It's complicated, isn't it? Most military chaplains will
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:22 PM
Nov 2018

try their best to meet the needs of troops, regardless of their specific beliefs. Not all, but most.

Here's my story about that:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=296477

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
12. Great story!
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:35 PM
Nov 2018

I'm so proud of that Chaplain! He did the right thing when no one would have cared if he didn't. That's what heroes do.

The only thing that would have made the story better is if there had been a JAG involved. Then again, I'm betting some JAG O-3 wrote a legal opinion saying the Chaplain was right.

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
13. At the time, I really had no idea how that got done.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 03:48 PM
Nov 2018

Later during my enlistment, I learned more about how things functioned. From time to time, I guess I was a thorn in the side of a few people.

It always ended up working in my favor though. In my fourth year in the USAF, I was no longer interested in military service. I had nine months left to go. Just then, as an E-4, I got confronted with the whole United Way 100% unit participation thing. Since pay for an E-4 at the time was $256 per month, I was not eager to contribute, and declined.

Over a couple of weeks, the pressure grew for me to change my mind. I remained firm. Finally, I found myself in my Class A uniform standing at attention in a General's office at Ft. George Meade in Maryland. I had reached the top level of pressure, apparently. I continued to refuse, and cited regulations by number. "Get out of here, Sergeant!"

So, I left after following the usual protocols for exiting from a General's office. Two days later, I was discharged. Apparently they found an early release program they could use, so I left with an Honorable Discharge, nine months short of my end of enlistment date. I got in my old Volvo, and started off for California and a new life. The unit finally had 100% United Way participation, and I had my freedom.

The folks I worked with at the big building on that base with no windows were not happy that I was leaving. I had a particular special talent that was very useful to them. Useful enough that they offered me a GS-14 position if I would stick around. I declined that, too.

Oh, well. Sometimes sticking to your guns has unexpected benefits. I never thought about going through legal channels. Hmm...It all worked out just right, though.

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
14. You were a pain in the ass, weren't you?
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 04:16 PM
Nov 2018

I had to fight that battle a couple of times for soldiers without your ability to cite regulations. My recollection is it always involved some over-eager Captain company commander. The GOs always seemed to get it.

What was a AF-type doing at Ft. Meade - or is the windowless office a clue?

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
16. They sent me to an intensive Russian language school.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 06:14 PM
Nov 2018

I did well. After 15 months in Turkey, I ended up in the NSA building, doing stuff I was good at.

Yes, I was a pain in the ass. I got all involved in the anti-war movement in DC. I showed up at some protests in uniform, and even got arrested once. I showed my security badge to the cop and he turned me loose. I was done with military service.

The United Way thing was my last stand. Because of my unique talent, I had some cover, I guess. So they just faded me out. It was funny to me at that point. They gave up, I think. Once I was out, I never heard any more. I used up my GI Bill benefits, and went on with my life.

There are many stories from the USAF days. Most can't be told. It was an interesting time. I pushed, but didn't exceed, lots of limits, and came out unscathed. I even met Richard Nixon at one point, although I only said, "Good morning, Mr. President."

Fun times! I wish I could write a book about those three years and three months, but I can't. That would take it past the limits.

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
17. In my concerned legal opinion, that book should go unwritten.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 06:20 PM
Nov 2018

Although, you probably could get the appropriate clearances under a different administration. However, it would be a unique pain - probably a lot of edits and re-writes after "review" by the spooks.

MineralMan

(146,262 posts)
18. Nope. Not even 50 years later.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 06:28 PM
Nov 2018

Not even posthumously. I'm not going to do it, funny and fascinating as it would be. I agreed not to disclose stuff, and I'm good for my word.

It's all just memories that remain untold. Nothing horrible or too bizarre, but weird all the same.

Oh well...

TomSlick

(11,088 posts)
19. Nevertheless.
Sat Nov 3, 2018, 06:43 PM
Nov 2018

Thank you for your service - even if it was in the Air Force - and you didn't have a good time.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»An oldie but a goodie on ...