Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
Sun May 5, 2019, 03:42 PM May 2019

Can anyone think of an instance where Christianity has benefited

the indigenous culture of a non-Christian place? I cannot. Certainly not in the Americas, where Christianity obliterated the existing cultures and religions as soon as they possibly could. In North, Central, and South America, long-established cultures and civilizations were wantonly destroyed and the people already there enslaved or slaughtered.

Most of Asia successfully resisted this, and ages old cultures and religions still survive in many places, but in the West, where Europeans exerted serious colonization and exploitation efforts, there is virtually nothing left of what was there when they arrived. In California, for example, the Spanish systematically destroyed the coastal aboriginal cultures and enslaved and destroyed the people they found. Near the Pacific coast, almost nothing survives of the cultures and peoples whose territory it was.

In Central America and Mexico, millennia-old civilizations, cultures, and religions were systematically destroyed as well, in the name of Christ. In North America, death and banishment were the tools used to destroy the fragile cultures discovered when the Europeans landed and began talking over indigenous territories. Any resistance was met with genocide, by any means necessary. Again this was done in the name of Jesus. The "Savages" were destroyed so that Christians might achieve wealth and land. South America suffered a similar fate, and the destruction of indigenous peoples and the environment continues today.

I don't think there is any place where something like this did not occur or where an attempt to make it occur was not undertaken. While Christianity failed in Asia, generally, the rest of the planet was overrun by Christians, who destroyed what was there before their arrival.

So, is it any wonder that some countries, like China, do not wish to allow Christians or Muslims to replace their ancient culture and territory? Makes sense to me.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can anyone think of an instance where Christianity has benefited (Original Post) MineralMan May 2019 OP
Perhaps in a few cannibal tribes throughout the years... JustFiveMoreMinutes May 2019 #1
Those tribes, too, are long gone. MineralMan May 2019 #2
Greed and conquest are everywhere, but only Christianity and Islam have marylandblue May 2019 #4
Good point! MineralMan May 2019 #10
Can anyone think of an instance where Christianity has benefited ffo May 2019 #3
Christianity is akin to a bacterial and/or viral infection and benefits none ... other than RKP5637 May 2019 #5
I never looked at it quite that way. MineralMan May 2019 #9
Empire through missionaries Soph0571 May 2019 #6
Yes. MineralMan May 2019 #11
Good article, MineralMan. Firestorm49 May 2019 #7
Thanks! MineralMan May 2019 #8
I have personal experience of a church that abqtommy May 2019 #12
I'm not talking about individual churches or missions. MineralMan May 2019 #13
I don't think we can speak abqtommy May 2019 #16
You have had some personal experience w/ Eastern Orthodoxy, sprinkleeninow May 2019 #14
I'm afraid I don't know the story of the Christianizing of the Slavs, MineralMan May 2019 #15
I do know that our word slave comes from the uriel1972 May 2019 #17
Ain't necessarily so.😊 sprinkleeninow May 2019 #18
Heh... uriel1972 May 2019 #20
In a part of my understanding is that Eastern Orthodox were also sprinkleeninow May 2019 #19
OH yes very much so... uriel1972 May 2019 #21

JustFiveMoreMinutes

(2,133 posts)
1. Perhaps in a few cannibal tribes throughout the years...
Sun May 5, 2019, 03:48 PM
May 2019

.. one or two or a few Christians were found to be 'in good taste'.

Wondering aloud....

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
2. Those tribes, too, are long gone.
Sun May 5, 2019, 03:51 PM
May 2019

I didn't mention Africa, but similar efforts were undertaken there, as well. They did not work forever, though, and many parts of Africa have rejected European influence and are attempting to re-exert their own ways. However, exploitation of raw materials for industrial nations is still a major factor in many parts of Africa. People are still being enslaved and "Christianized."

On the other hand, Islam is gaining headway in many parts of Africa, and is another foreign religion with a goal of dominating entire nations and replacing existing cultures. Christianity and Islam seem to be the most guilty of this of all foreign religions. Both are Abrahamic "religions of the book" Maybe there's something in that to stimulate the greed and conqueror attitudes.

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
4. Greed and conquest are everywhere, but only Christianity and Islam have
Sun May 5, 2019, 04:15 PM
May 2019

exclusionary views of religion. When those religions show up, the native instinct is to add the new god to their pantheon of spirits or whatever. Only later do they realize they have to drop their old religion.

But in the east, religions are additive. You could always worship whatever gods you wanted no matter where they came from.

ffo

(15 posts)
3. Can anyone think of an instance where Christianity has benefited
Sun May 5, 2019, 04:06 PM
May 2019

It has benefited clergy in spreading the word, "I want you to do something to me."

RKP5637

(67,104 posts)
5. Christianity is akin to a bacterial and/or viral infection and benefits none ... other than
Sun May 5, 2019, 04:24 PM
May 2019

being a money-making political scheme for those on the take. It's no wonder that many are finally smartening up and seeing it for what it is and leaving. Christianity is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetuated on mankind.

Soph0571

(9,685 posts)
6. Empire through missionaries
Sun May 5, 2019, 05:04 PM
May 2019

It was a thing for a very long time.... the sun never set on the empire in a big part cause Christianity

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
12. I have personal experience of a church that
Sun May 5, 2019, 06:41 PM
May 2019

performs "good works" here in the US as well as internationally. The church my parents belonged to and worked for in West Pakistan (with me and my sister along) operated a hospital in Karachi and supported disaster relief. This same church operates hospitals in the US, including one for the Navajo people, in Monument Valley. So yes, I agree that there's plenty of evidence that many Christians are definitely responsible for heinous behavior there's evidence that condemnation should't be universal.

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
13. I'm not talking about individual churches or missions.
Sun May 5, 2019, 07:43 PM
May 2019

I'm talking about Christianity as a whole, in a historical sense.

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
16. I don't think we can speak
Mon May 6, 2019, 04:44 PM
May 2019

of any segment of humanity as a whole no matter how we define it. People are different even when the same ethnicity/cultures, religious beliefs/genders apply and so on. To continue to do so is a disservice to humanity AS A WHOLE.

sprinkleeninow

(20,237 posts)
14. You have had some personal experience w/ Eastern Orthodoxy,
Mon May 6, 2019, 03:42 PM
May 2019

yes?

Sts. Cyril and Methodious brought Christianity to the Slavs.

Am I, as an Orthodox of Slavic heritage, troubling to you or anyone? ☺

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
15. I'm afraid I don't know the story of the Christianizing of the Slavs,
Mon May 6, 2019, 03:51 PM
May 2019

so I can't really comment. However the Orthodox church hasn't been big on missionary work or foreign conquest, so...

uriel1972

(4,261 posts)
17. I do know that our word slave comes from the
Mon May 6, 2019, 08:17 PM
May 2019

large amount of Slavic people brought to Europe as, well, slaves. There was conquest aplenty as well as forced conversion techniques applied. Was this the fault of Christianity, not altogether, but the messianic 'Saving' of other peoples did bring a lot of misery.

That said there was also the work of the Byzantine/Eastern Roman Empire, which through influence and trade spread Christianity through more peaceful means. The question is did it really benefit it's new adherents?

Was all the misery and suffering worth it? Could the advances of European technology (some of which was other peoples) be spread without the conquest in the name of God?

I still think the world would have been better off without the 'Crusades' the official and unofficial ones.

sprinkleeninow

(20,237 posts)
18. Ain't necessarily so.😊
Mon May 6, 2019, 09:55 PM
May 2019

>>In fact, the most popular version sees “Slavs” as deriving from slovo, “word,” (meaning “people who can speak our way”). There are also historians who tie the etymology of “Slavs” to the ancient Indo-European word, slauos, which meant, “people.”<<

Not contending, just sayin'....

uriel1972

(4,261 posts)
20. Heh...
Tue May 7, 2019, 02:56 AM
May 2019

I meant that our European word "Slave" derives from "Slav" not the other way round. Sorry if I was not clear.

uriel1972

(4,261 posts)
21. OH yes very much so...
Tue May 7, 2019, 03:00 AM
May 2019

The first targets of the Crusades were Orthodox Christians. I was also using the word crusade in it's broader sense, as well as it's tight sense of "The Crusades" all four(?) of them culminating in the invasion of Constantinople by Venice.

"Crusades" as messianic type missions to "Save" something or the other do more harm than good.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Can anyone think of an in...