Religion

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts) Wed Jan 23, 2013, 11:26 AM Jan 2013

If you gain, you gain all; If you lose, you lose nothing...

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If you gain, you gain all; If you lose, you lose nothing... (Original Post) cleanhippie Jan 2013 OP

Simpson's Wager pokerfan Jan 2013 #1

Simpson may dumb, but he ain't stupid. cleanhippie Jan 2013 #2

Truly Homer has hit the nail on the head. uriel1972 Jan 2013 #6

Hmmm... Speck Tater Jan 2013 #5

Maybe it reminds you of the receipt Romulus Quirinus Jan 2013 #7

You can increase your odds of winning by believing fervently in all gods. It's like betting on dimbear Jan 2013 #3

He said lots of things. rug Jan 2013 #4

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)

1. Simpson's Wager

Reply to cleanhippie (Original post)

Wed Jan 23, 2013, 01:03 PM

Jan 2013

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)

2. Simpson may dumb, but he ain't stupid.

Reply to pokerfan (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 23, 2013, 01:57 PM

Jan 2013

uriel1972

(4,261 posts)

6. Truly Homer has hit the nail on the head.

Reply to cleanhippie (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 02:35 AM

Jan 2013

How do we know the Christian God is the God we need to believe in to see a version of Heaven? There are so many Gods known and there may be even more unknown, the deal gets worse by the minute.

Speck Tater

(10,618 posts)

5. Hmmm...

Reply to pokerfan (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 02:10 AM

Jan 2013

Romulus Quirinus

(524 posts)

7. Maybe it reminds you of the receipt

Reply to Speck Tater (Reply #5)

Sat Jan 26, 2013, 04:54 AM

Jan 2013

that came on your pizza?

dimbear

(6,271 posts)

3. You can increase your odds of winning by believing fervently in all gods. It's like betting on

Reply to cleanhippie (Original post)

Wed Jan 23, 2013, 08:21 PM

Jan 2013

both red and black (at the same time) at roulette.

rug

(82,333 posts)

4. He said lots of things.

Reply to cleanhippie (Original post)

Wed Jan 23, 2013, 08:49 PM

Jan 2013

"Atheism shows strength of mind, but only to a certain degree." Pensées, no. 225 (1670)

Reply to this discussion