Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Annulment reform and a golden age for canon law
The inevitability of an overhaul actually was confirmed before the synod began, when Francis created an 11-member commission to work on a simplification of annulment procedures led by Monsignor Pio Vito Pinto, dean of the Roman Rota, the main canon law court in Rome dealing with marriage cases.
Momentum was bolstered again last week, when Pope Francis reiterated his call for reform in a speech to the Rota.
There was concern for speeding up the procedure for reasons of justice, he said. How many people wait for years for a sentence!
Francis said the Church has a duty to say to people: Yes, its true, your marriage is null, or No, your marriage is valid.
http://www.cruxnow.com/church/2014/11/11/annulment-reform-and-a-golden-age-for-canon-law/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 2228 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Annulment reform and a golden age for canon law (Original Post)
UrbScotty
Nov 2014
OP
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)1. How about the offspring of an annulled marriage?
Are they still bastards?
No Vested Interest
(5,164 posts)2. The children of annulled marriages never were bastards.
One should inform oneself before commenting on that which he/she doesn't know.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)3. They are not considered born out of wedlock?
Sorry, my error.
What is their status?
No Vested Interest
(5,164 posts)4. Short answer - Civil law.
Google is your friend.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)5. I thought we were discussing Canon Law.
No Vested Interest
(5,164 posts)6. Canon 1137 of the Code of Canon Law.
As stated above, Google is replete with this information.
This is not new or recent news.
Now that explicit notice has been provided, I leave the commenter to inform him/her self.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)7. And here I thought I was a bastard by order of the Church.
I'll have to find another excuse.
I might become a Republican.
No Vested Interest
(5,164 posts)8. Whatever works for you - go for it. nt
rug
(82,333 posts)9. That title is usualy bestowed by popular acclaim.
No Vested Interest is correct about the ecclesiastical status of children born to Catholics who are not sacramentally married.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)10. Guess I'm just a putative bastard.
rug
(82,333 posts)11. Well, you're in the right place then.
Welcome.