Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Behind the Aegis

(53,921 posts)
Thu Aug 8, 2019, 02:53 PM Aug 2019

(Jewish Group) What the bid to unseat Josh Frydenberg reveals about white, self-defined progressives

THIS IS THE JEWISH GROUP! RESPECT!!)

In response to the news that a challenge has been mounted against Treasurer Josh Frydenberg’s eligibility to sit in the Australian parliament under section 44 of the constitution, “the rules” have been cited, as have double standards.

One of the arguments goes if Labor and Greens parliamentarians were forced to resign their seats because they were found to be dual nationals, it is hypocritical of the government to shield “their man”.

I have long been critical of the tendency of both sides of Australian politics to mobilise the history of the Holocaust as a defence against criticism of its racist migration policies, the punitive asylum detention regime in particular.

It is not lost on me that Josh Frydenberg happily defends his government’s policy of locking up those who seek asylum by boat on Manus Island and Nauru and keeping countless others in limbo “on shore” while claiming special status because his mother fled the Nazis and the Hungarian fascists to come to Australia.

As Malcolm Turnbull put it when he was prime minister, to legally challenge Frydenberg over his eligibility represents a failure to think “a little deeper about the history of the Holocaust”.

more...

When an anti-Zionist Jew has to speak out, you know the anti-Semitism must be really real.
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Jewish Group»(Jewish Group) What the b...