Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

raccoon

(31,110 posts)
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 06:40 AM Jul 2014

Could the cat gene pool in England be slightly different from in other countries, so that cats there

have a longer life span?

The 3 cats mentioned in the article below all live(d) in England. I know you can't reach a conclusion based on three individuals, but I wonder if this is biologically possible.

Biology isn't my strong suit. If it's yours, please chime in

Lincolnshire cat could be world's oldest (BBC)
17 July 2014 Last updated at 02:55 BST

Two pet owners in Lincolnshire are vying for the title of world's oldest cat.

When the oldest puss in the world, Poppy, died in at the age of 24, Amanda Gray came forward and revealed her feline friend Maddie was also 24.

But she faces a challenger to the crown in Pinky - who is 28-years-old - and her owner has documentary proof.


video: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-28338439

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could the cat gene pool in England be slightly different from in other countries, so that cats there (Original Post) raccoon Jul 2014 OP
Not genes but a much better environment intaglio Jul 2014 #1
UK apparently has more effective policy to police stray domesticated animals, as well? Hissyspit Jul 2014 #3
The various charities are pretty effective at collection of feral cats intaglio Jul 2014 #4
That was my impression on my two trips there. Hissyspit Jul 2014 #5
Kipper longevity diet? tanyev Jul 2014 #2

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
1. Not genes but a much better environment
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 07:50 AM
Jul 2014

No raccoons, porcupines, skunks, bears, wolves, coyotes, only one mildly poisonous snake.

Recently I got told off by one idiot when I reported the death of our young cat because we let it roam. I don't know of any private owner outside cities with "house only" cats so generally cats get more exercise and don't go "stir crazy"

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
3. UK apparently has more effective policy to police stray domesticated animals, as well?
Sun Jul 20, 2014, 11:03 PM
Jul 2014

By the way, I live in the country and there is no way I could keep my cats inside. They spend the night inside and I keep them under close control, but they are stray rescues all, and would drive me insane if I never let them out.

intaglio

(8,170 posts)
4. The various charities are pretty effective at collection of feral cats
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 06:49 AM
Jul 2014

and there are some that catch, neuter and release in cities.

The only living predators of cats generally are foxes and badgers; of those 2 foxes tend to avoid them (there are lots of things easier to catch that don't have 5 pointy ends). Badgers will take them but lack the speed to catch a halfway healthy cat.

There has been a BBC documentary "The Secret Life of Cats", unfortunately it is not yet on BBC iPlayer but here is the home page

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
5. That was my impression on my two trips there.
Mon Jul 21, 2014, 04:57 PM
Jul 2014

I live in the Anerican South. It's a nightmare here.

Roadkill and stray animals everywhere.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Could the cat gene pool i...