Science
Related: About this forumNews Science Evolution Scientists find clue to human evolution's burning question
The advantage of this method of preparing food is clear: it makes food tastier, easier to digest and makes the extraction of energy from raw ingredients quicker and more efficient. All useful things if you want to power an over-sized, energy-hungry brain without having to spend all your time foraging and chewing food.
Richard Wrangham, a professor of biological anthropology at Harvard University, has argued that the invention of cooking split the ancestors of humans from the evolutionary path that went on to include modern gorillas and chimpanzees. Cooking allowed our ancestors to develop bigger brains and, in his hypothesis, is the key reason modern humans emerged. The controlled use of fire, according to Wrangham, was a more important milestone in human evolution than the invention of agriculture or eating meat.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/apr/02/scientists-clue-human-evolution-question?CMP=twt_fd
immoderate
(20,885 posts)Grog?
--imm
xchrom
(108,903 posts)Barely cooked. Maybe seared on the outside but pretty raw for the rest.
It's really not that hard to cook well using a basic fire. And they would get a hell of a lot of practice to refine their technique.
Warpy
(111,169 posts)We need to denature those proteins by cooking it through or it's like eating blood flavored bubble gum, although pre fire they might have pounded it between two stones to pre masticate it, turning it into kind of a raw sausage.
As for cooking things through, consider that you can make grass baskets woven tightly enough to be impermeable to water, load your food and some water into it, and drop a rock heated in a fire on top of the food and end up with a stew a couple of hours later. Likewise, you build fire on top of any flattish rock, let it burn down to embers, and then brush away embers and ash and use the surface of the rock as your hot cooking surface, the earliest form of stove. Or you build a fire in a pit and let it burn down a bit, smother it with a bed of grass and leaves, put in the food, cover it with more grass, and shovel dirt over the whole business. Dinner will be cooked, smoked and ready to serve in about 3 hours.
There are lots of ways to cook food fully that don't require either a spit over a roaring fire or an iron or clay pot set on embers, methods that haven't really survived in the anthropological records but which are used today among tribal peoples who haven't been introduced to technology.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)our 'cooking' could barely be called that probably for a long, long time.
our jaws didn't develop ahead of us -- i don't think.
Warpy
(111,169 posts)either break it down mechanically by grinding (the two rocks) or denature the proteins by cooking. The former method was likely the one used pre fire.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)izquierdista
(11,689 posts)Where do sushi and carpaccio eaters fit on the evolutionary timeline?
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)on this thesis back in 2010. This article, despite the current date, feels as if it had been written several years ago.
Perhaps the most fascinating part of the book was the research showing how little nutrition is derived if one eats non-cooked foods exclusively.
SamG
(535 posts)protein than does raw meat. And that several "accidents" of storing fresh kill meats and grains next to fires led to the "discovery" of cooking.
Definitely cooked foods offer an evolutionary advantage for survival, as well as increased height and weight for adults who grew up eating cooked foods, consuming and metabolizing more protein in the growing years.
I have only confined my own reading to prehistory mostly from 100,000 years ago up until the beginnings of actually recorded history, 10,000 years or less ago. To think that there were 700,000 to 900,000 years more of previous history of homo sapiens engaged in cooking, kind of blows my mind.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Our ancestors were probably a lot more like us than we'll ever know.
Ezlivin
(8,153 posts)The next evolutionary step was utensils, I'll wager.
SamG
(535 posts)Of course women did all the cooking back then, and there were no dishes or utensils to wash.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)Only Ug & Mug near the QUE.
Mrs Ug & Mrs Mug are downing brewskies.
deucemagnet
(4,549 posts)Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)I've seen estimates varying from 4 million years to even longer than 7 million years ago.
We weren't cooking then, so how does this theory make sense?