Why biologists don’t put too much stock in race
Why biologists dont put too much stock in race
by Faye Flam
Bloomberg
Oct 4, 2016
NEW YORK Race is perhaps the worst idea ever to come out of science. Scientists were responsible for officially dividing human beings into Europeans, Africans, Asians and Native Americans and promoting these groups as sub-species or separate species altogether. That happened back in the 18th century, but the division lends the feel of scientific legitimacy to the prejudice that haunts the 21st.
Racial tension proved a major point of contention in the first 2016 presidential debate, and yet just days before, scientists announced theyd used wide-ranging samples of DNA to add new detail to the consensus story that we all share a relatively recent common origin in Africa. While many human species and sub-species once roamed the planet, theres abundant evidence that beyond a small genetic contribution from Neanderthals and a couple of other sub-species, only one branch of humanity survived to the present day.
Up for grabs was whether modern non-Africans stemmed from one or more migrations out of Africa. The newest data suggests there was a single journey that sometime between 50,000 and 80,000 years ago, a single population of humans left Africa and went on to settle in Asia, Europe, the Americas, the South Pacific, and everywhere else. But this finding amounts to just dotting the is and crossing the ts on a scientific view that long ago rendered notion of human races obsolete.
We never use the term race, said Harvard geneticist Swapan Mallick, an author on one of the papers revealing the latest DNA-based human story. Were all part of the tapestry of humanity, and its interesting to see how we got where we are.
More:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2016/10/04/commentary/world-commentary/biologists-dont-put-much-stock-race/#.V_eRDUkVCWw