Science
Related: About this forumPacific Islanders appear to be carrying the DNA of an unknown human species
Hints of an unidentified, extinct human species have been found in the DNA of modern Melanesians - those living in a region of the South Pacific, northeast of Australia.
According to new genetic modelling, the species is unlikely to be Neanderthal or Denisovan - two ancient species that are represented in the fossil record - but could represent a third, unknown human relative that has so far eluded archaeologists.
"Were missing a population, or were misunderstanding something about the relationships," Ryan Bohlender, a statistical geneticist from the University of Texas, told Tina Hesman Saey at Science News.
http://www.sciencealert.com/pacific-islanders-appear-to-be-carrying-the-dna-of-an-unknown-human-species
Sanity Claws
(21,846 posts)I know if I were an ET, I'd pick the South Pacific as a place to live on this planet.
(In case it's not obvious, this is a joke.)
Lochloosa
(16,063 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,994 posts)However, there is an ongoing debate over whether H. floresiensis is indeed a separate species.[158] Some scientists hold that H. floresiensis was a modern H. sapiens with pathological dwarfism.[159] This hypothesis is supported in part, because some modern humans who live on Flores, the Indonesian island where the skeleton was found, are pygmies. This, coupled with pathological dwarfism, could have resulted in a significantly diminutive human. The other major attack on H. floresiensis as a separate species is that it was found with tools only associated with H. sapiens.[159]
The hypothesis of pathological dwarfism, however, fails to explain additional anatomical features that are unlike those of modern humans (diseased or not) but much like those of ancient members of our genus. Aside from cranial features, these features include the form of bones in the wrist, forearm, shoulder, knees, and feet. Additionally, this hypothesis fails to explain the find of multiple examples of individuals with these same characteristics, indicating they were common to a large population, and not limited to one individual. -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution#H._floresiensis
cstanleytech
(26,283 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)Hekate
(90,645 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)but if you're gonna eat snakes ...
and the effect could be compounded over hundreds of thousands of years
_________________________
I suppose all will let me know if my humor is really bad
allan01
(1,950 posts)dembotoz
(16,799 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,847 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)of when they were viewing earth (The mother planet supposedly ancient and wise) thru their monitors and commented on a traffic jam as how well organized and orderly we were.
Plus , I loved those Cylons -
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)Pacific Islander!
Very cool!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)PatSeg
(47,399 posts)Thanks for posting.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)We keep finding new lines of human or human like species. The deep past is intriguing...other than to those who choose to ignore scientific fact and think it all began 5-6,000 years ago.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)in the fossil record or as a part of the DNA profile?