Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHan

(10,173 posts)
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 10:52 AM Dec 2016

Trump's Pick for Budget Director Isn't Sure the Government Should Fund Scientific Research

http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2016/12/trumps-pick-budget-director-isnt-sure-government-should-fund-scientific-research

If confirmed by the Senate to lead the Office of Management and Budget, Mulvaney, a deficit hawk who recently spoke before a chapter of the right-wing-fringe John Birch Society, would be in charge of crafting Trump's budget and overseeing the functioning of federal agencies. One thing he seems to believe the budget and the agencies should not be funding is research into diseases like the Zika virus.

Two weeks before Congress finally passed more than $1 billion to fight the spread of Zika and its effects, Mulvaney questioned whether the government should fund any scientific research. "[D]o we need government-funded research at all," he wrote in a Facebook post on September 9 unearthed by the Democratic opposition research group American Bridge. Mulvaney appears to have deleted his Facebook page since then.


If there wasn't a trend to Trump's cabinet picks I would be less worried, but all of them believe in regressive, anarcho-capitalist "the market will solve it" principles.

And we're screwed anyway: Trump already wants to scrap climate change research.

If Mulvaney guts funding, and you're an epidemiologist whose area of expertise is vaccines, and you don't depend on funding from pharmaceutical companies to avoid conflict of interest, you're screwed.

Our Government research agencies are the bedrock for R&D, gutting agencies will see us lose ground to China and Russia, and affect researchers or all stripes directly.

#GoodGoingAmerica
#YouDidIt
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's Pick for Budget Director Isn't Sure the Government Should Fund Scientific Research (Original Post) JHan Dec 2016 OP
A nice epidemic Turbineguy Dec 2016 #1
We could call it a Final Market Solution. bluedigger Dec 2016 #2
We should really stop with the Hitler references. Turbineguy Dec 2016 #3
On the other hand, there's no sense reinventing the wheel. bluedigger Dec 2016 #5
And Trump is going to put the money where we most need it.... JHan Dec 2016 #4
Apparently Mulvaney's grand ambition... Girard442 Dec 2016 #6
Unless DARPA or the DoD zipplewrath Dec 2016 #7
they will never touch those, trump is going to expand "research" in those areas... JHan Dec 2016 #8

Turbineguy

(37,278 posts)
3. We should really stop with the Hitler references.
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 11:09 AM
Dec 2016

It's not fair to Germans. They did not elect this guy.

OK, just this once: Eindmarktlossung.

JHan

(10,173 posts)
4. And Trump is going to put the money where we most need it....
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 11:30 AM
Dec 2016

Defense Funding.
Because our military industrial complex isn't YUUUUUGGGGEEE enough..

Girard442

(6,063 posts)
6. Apparently Mulvaney's grand ambition...
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 11:47 AM
Dec 2016

...is to die atop a giant heap of money, of a disease that could have been prevented if only the CDC had been able to research it.

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
7. Unless DARPA or the DoD
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 12:19 PM
Dec 2016

Someone ought to ask him which research programs over at DARPA he wants to defund, or those in the many labs that the DoD runs.

JHan

(10,173 posts)
8. they will never touch those, trump is going to expand "research" in those areas...
Tue Dec 20, 2016, 10:17 PM
Dec 2016

even if it breaks the budget.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Trump's Pick for Budget D...