Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,501 posts)
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 04:30 AM Dec 2016

The Supervolcano That Killed The Neanderthals Might Be Waking Up

The Supervolcano That Killed The Neanderthals Might Be Waking Up

New research suggests continued monitoring is needed for major Italian site

By Alasdair Wilkins
Dec 26, 2016 at 1:00 PM ET


The Italian city of Naples has the worst luck when it comes to volcanoes. It sits less than six miles west of Mount Vesuvius, which most infamously buried Pompeii nearly 2,000 years ago. But somehow Vesuvius isn’t the biggest volcanic threat the modern city faces: Within the Naples metropolitan area is Campi Flegrei, a supervolcano whose eruption 40,000 years ago might have wiped out the Neanderthals. And, according to new research, the supervolcano could be stirring from its slumber.

An iconic volcano is an exploding mountain — think Vesuvius or Washington’s Mount Saint Helens, which erupted in 1980 — but supervolcanoes typically look unassuming. Campi Flegrei, or the Phlegraean Fields, is actually hidden underneath the Mediterranean Sea, forming a complex network of craters and geysers. Any supervolcano eruption has the potential for significant loss of life and environmental damage. That Campi Flegrei is located right at the doorstep of a city of a half-million people only exacerbates the danger.

A team of Italian and French researchers have examined the recent activity at the site. There’s still a lot unknown about how supervolcano eruptions occur, but the researchers argue that the movement of magma can cause the sudden, massive release of gases, which then heat up and deform the rocks that would otherwise be keeping a lid on the supervolcano. The researchers found that Campi Flegrei’s recent activity of surface deformation appears to fit that model, suggesting it is entering a critical state where an eruption is theoretically possible.

That doesn’t necessarily mean the Phlegraean Fields are going to erupt tomorrow or anytime soon. Forecasting supervolcano eruptions is an inexact science, and the researchers end their paper by calling for continued monitoring of the area, not an evacuation.

More:
http://www.vocativ.com/386939/the-supervolcano-that-killed-the-neanderthals-might-be-waking-up/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Supervolcano That Killed The Neanderthals Might Be Waking Up (Original Post) Judi Lynn Dec 2016 OP
"Supervolcano That Killed The Neanderthals"...... that theory has been debunked Grey Lemercier Dec 2016 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2017 #6
Would there be "environmental damage " ? Kilgore Dec 2016 #2
Because conservationists want to conserve. Igel Dec 2016 #3
If it kills Neanderthals CanonRay Dec 2016 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2017 #5
True. CanonRay Jan 2017 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2017 #8
You got me. CanonRay Jan 2017 #9

Response to Grey Lemercier (Reply #1)

Kilgore

(1,733 posts)
2. Would there be "environmental damage " ?
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 09:42 AM
Dec 2016

From the article:

"Any supervolcano eruption has the potential for significant loss of life and environmental damage."

Why is this environmental damage if the environment is changing itself with no human cause? I would agree its changing, but not being damaged.

Igel

(35,293 posts)
3. Because conservationists want to conserve.
Wed Dec 28, 2016, 10:11 PM
Dec 2016

They're the ultimate "things must not change," and typically pick some random point from their past.

Nature is change, and sometimes cataclysms are natural.

Leaving aside whether humans are in some sense part of nature, so having humans destroy the planet is no less "natural" than having an asteroid run into it or a supervolcano that belches a mess of sulfur that destroys much of the ocean's life.

Response to CanonRay (Reply #4)

Response to CanonRay (Reply #7)

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The Supervolcano That Kil...