Science
Related: About this forumPicture : All the earth's water in a single sphere compared to earth
This picture shows the size of a sphere that would contain all of Earth's water in comparison to the size of the Earth. The blue sphere sitting on the United States, reaching from about Salt Lake City, Utah to Topeka, Kansas, has a diameter of about 860 miles (about 1,385 kilometers) , with a volume of about 332,500,000 cubic miles (1,386,000,000 cubic kilometers). The sphere includes all the water in the oceans, seas, ice caps, lakes and rivers as well as groundwater, atmospheric water, and even the water in you, your dog, and your tomato plant.
Credit: Illustration by Jack Cook, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; USGS..
Data source: Igor Shiklomanov's chapter "World fresh water resources" in Peter H. Gleick (editor), 1993, Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World's Fresh Water Resources (Oxford University Press, New York).
http://ga.water.usgs.gov/edu/2010/gallery/global-water-volume.html
Mammone
(23 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Humans are pretty reckless and careless with earth's water.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)Nostradammit
(2,921 posts)And a very cool and thought-provoking graphic.
BlueIris
(29,135 posts)That just looks wrong to me.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)of my link.
Think about the extremely thin earth's crust we live on
as compared to the mantle and core.
Geophysical studies have revealed that the Earth has several distinct layers. Each of these layers has its own properties. The outermost layer of the Earth is the crust. This comprises the continents and ocean basins. The crust has a variable thickness, being 35-70 km thick in the continents and 5-10 km thick in the ocean basins.
The next layer is the mantle, which is composed mainly of ferro-magnesium silicates. It is about 2900 km thick, and is separated into the upper and lower mantle.
The last layer is the core, which is separated into the liquid outer core and the solid inner core. The outer core is 2300 km thick and the inner core is 1200 km thick.
link from NASA jpl added
http://scign.jpl.nasa.gov/learn/plate1.htm
SwissTony
(2,560 posts)Wiki states 1,338,000,000 cubic kilometers of water which gives a radius of 684 km for the water sphere as compared to an earth radius of 6378 km. These (first two figures) aren't too different from what's given at the website.
Your homework, children...1) if the entire earth was flooded to a depth of 100 metres, how much EXTRA water would be required? Answer: a lot!!!
2) after the flood, where did it go?
Confusious
(8,317 posts)But if the earth was flooded, at sea level, the water vapor in the air would make the air heavy enough to crush you.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)The Earth's water compared to the Earth is like saran-wrapping a basketball. The oceans are only a thin film.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)I thought there would be more water than that, and I'm surprised just how smooth a sphere ol' earthy here is.
Esse Quam Videri
(685 posts)A lot less water than I thought.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...much less than I would have figured..
Uben
(7,719 posts)...especially when you consider the portion of earth that cannot contain water. We live on the surface. so that is the area we are concerned with, and that area is two-thirds water. Feel better now?
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)How much of that 2/3s is contaminated by humans? Oil spills, nuclear disasters and dumping garbage come to mind. But, for now, I'm more concerned with protecting our ground water from contamination by fracking, for instance.
We are poor caretakers of our environment and that must change, no matter what portion of our world is water.
qazplm
(3,626 posts)the tiniest fraction.
The problem of course is that life is fragile, and freshwater is only a small fraction of all the water on the planet.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)Champion Jack
(5,378 posts).
dickthegrouch
(3,172 posts)Someone recently was asked how much of the total amount of water on the planet was fresh and the answer came out at 3% which is truly frightening when you consider how much of it we're polluting.
Tumbulu
(6,272 posts)and not what I expected.......
332,500,000 cubic miles is still immensely big.
cbrer
(1,831 posts)If true, what I misinterpreted all along was that 4/5ths of the Earths "SURFACE" is covered with water. Not the composition of the whole 3rd rock.
BadgerKid
(4,550 posts)Insert surface area to volume ratio argument here.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Even though its Slightly smaller than Earth's moon
Europa contains about twice the liquid water of all the Earth's oceans .
Its oceans are sixty miles deep whereas ours is only average of two.and half miles
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)They have the world's biggest everything out there.
edcantor
(325 posts)the difference between the 8000 miles of Earth diameter, and the 2-3 miles of Ocean depth over the surface of most of the planet.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)In the March 2012 issue of Physics Today [1], Marc Hirschman and David Kohlstedt explore the history of the deep water cycle as it is linked to Earths history, as well as the role of water in Earths mantle from the microscopic considerations to the macroscopic consequences. The authors also note that carbon, like water, cycles through Earths interior with vast quantities being stored in the mantle and that it has an equally profound impact on Earths dynamics.
https://dco.gl.ciw.edu/water%E2%80%94and-beyond%E2%80%94-earths-mantle
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/03/0307_0307_waterworld.html
...
"Many earth scientists have thought that tectonic plates are not likely to carry much if any water deep into the Earth's mantle when they are being subducted," said Adam Schultz, a professor in the College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences at Oregon State and a co-author on the Nature study. "Most evidence suggests that subducting rocks initially hold water within their minerals, but that water is released as the rocks heat up."
"There may be other explanations," he added, "but the model clearly shows a close association between subduction zones and high conductivity and the simplest explanation is water."
...
"In fact, we don't really know how much water there is on Earth," said Gary Egbert, also a professor of oceanography at OSU and co-author on the study. "There is some evidence that there is many times more water below the ocean floor than there is in all the oceans of the world combined. Our results may shed some light on this question."
http://www.science20.com/news_articles/water_earths_mantle_may_be_responsible_unexpected_conductivity