Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumNeurocognitive basis for free will set out for the first time
From MedicalXpress:
...
Professor Thomas Hills from the Department of Psychology set out to bridge the gap between the philosophical arguments for free will and the neurocognitive realities.
In philosophy, elements of free will include the ability to do otherwisethe 'principle of alternative possibilities'; the ability to deliberate; a sense of self; and the ability to maintain goals 'wanting what you want."
Drawing on examples from making a morning coffee to taking a penalty kick, and considering organisms from human beings, e-coli, cockroaches, and even robots, Professor Hills argues that our neurocognitive abilities satisfy these requirements through:
more ...
Professor Thomas Hills from the Department of Psychology set out to bridge the gap between the philosophical arguments for free will and the neurocognitive realities.
In philosophy, elements of free will include the ability to do otherwisethe 'principle of alternative possibilities'; the ability to deliberate; a sense of self; and the ability to maintain goals 'wanting what you want."
Drawing on examples from making a morning coffee to taking a penalty kick, and considering organisms from human beings, e-coli, cockroaches, and even robots, Professor Hills argues that our neurocognitive abilities satisfy these requirements through:
- Adaptive access to unpredictability
- Tuning of this unpredictability to help us reach high-level goals
- Goal-directed deliberation via search over internal cognitive representations
- A role for conscious construction of the self in the generation and choice of alternatives.
more ...
The actual paper is here
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 924 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neurocognitive basis for free will set out for the first time (Original Post)
Jim__
Jul 2019
OP
i just read the link and not the paper but isn't he taking a philosophical approach
Kurt V.
Jul 2019
#1
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)1. i just read the link and not the paper but isn't he taking a philosophical approach
and not a scientific one?
Jim__
(14,063 posts)2. "Professor Thomas Hills ... set out to bridge the gap between the philosophical arguments ... "
"... and the neurocognitive realities."
He does refer to both compatibilist free will and libertarian free will which I would consider philosophical terms. But then he describes the type of neural processes that would be required for each and cites the scientific literature which has experimentally found these processes. I have read the paper but haven't taken notes or read the cited references and, at this point, my best understanding is that he believes the required neural processes exist; but further testing is necessary to see if these processes are actually performing the functions that would be required.
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)3. thanks for your insight. the contingencies of human behavior interest me more than
any other subject.