Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(14,063 posts)
Wed Jul 31, 2019, 01:43 PM Jul 2019

Neurocognitive basis for free will set out for the first time

From MedicalXpress:

...

Professor Thomas Hills from the Department of Psychology set out to bridge the gap between the philosophical arguments for free will and the neurocognitive realities.

In philosophy, elements of free will include the ability to do otherwise—the 'principle of alternative possibilities'; the ability to deliberate; a sense of self; and the ability to maintain goals – 'wanting what you want."

Drawing on examples from making a morning coffee to taking a penalty kick, and considering organisms from human beings, e-coli, cockroaches, and even robots, Professor Hills argues that our neurocognitive abilities satisfy these requirements through:

  1. Adaptive access to unpredictability
  2. Tuning of this unpredictability to help us reach high-level goals
  3. Goal-directed deliberation via search over internal cognitive representations
  4. A role for conscious construction of the self in the generation and choice of alternatives.


more ...


The actual paper is here
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Kurt V.

(5,624 posts)
1. i just read the link and not the paper but isn't he taking a philosophical approach
Wed Jul 31, 2019, 02:15 PM
Jul 2019

and not a scientific one?

Jim__

(14,063 posts)
2. "Professor Thomas Hills ... set out to bridge the gap between the philosophical arguments ... "
Wed Jul 31, 2019, 02:54 PM
Jul 2019

"... and the neurocognitive realities."

He does refer to both compatibilist free will and libertarian free will which I would consider philosophical terms. But then he describes the type of neural processes that would be required for each and cites the scientific literature which has experimentally found these processes. I have read the paper but haven't taken notes or read the cited references and, at this point, my best understanding is that he believes the required neural processes exist; but further testing is necessary to see if these processes are actually performing the functions that would be required.



Kurt V.

(5,624 posts)
3. thanks for your insight. the contingencies of human behavior interest me more than
Wed Jul 31, 2019, 05:03 PM
Jul 2019

any other subject.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Neurocognitive basis for ...