Science
Related: About this forumCovid-19: politicisation, "corruption," and suppression of science
They cite examples from the UK:
The UKs pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. First, the membership, research, and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) were initially secret until a press leak forced transparency.2 The leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers in SAGE, while exposing under-representation from public health, clinical care, women, and ethnic minorities. Indeed, the government was also recently ordered to release a 2016 report on deficiencies in pandemic preparedness, Operation Cygnus, following a verdict from the Information Commissioners Office.
and the US
Suppression of science and scientists is not new or a peculiarly British phenomenon. In the US, President Trumps government manipulated the Food and Drug Administration to hastily approve unproved drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir.15 Globally, people, policies, and procurement are being corrupted by political and commercial agendas
and gives recommendations:
How might science be safeguarded in these exceptional times? The first step is full disclosure of competing interests from government, politicians, scientific advisers, and appointees, such as the heads of test and trace, diagnostic test procurement, and vaccine delivery. The next step is full transparency about decision making systems, processes, and knowing who is accountable for what........
The stakes are high for politicians, scientific advisers, and government appointees. Their careers and bank balances may hinge on the decisions that they make. But they have a higher responsibility and duty to the public. Science is a public good. It doesnt need to be followed blindly, but it does need to be fairly considered. Importantly, suppressing science, whether by delaying publication, cherry picking favourable research, or gagging scientists, is a danger to public health, causing deaths by exposing people to unsafe or ineffective interventions and preventing them from benefiting from better ones. When entangled with commercial decisions it is also maladministration of taxpayers money.
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425
(well worth reading the whole thing)
This is particularly important as we roll out the vaccinations. If we don't know how to disseminate scientific fact, we won't get compliance. I think that's one reason we (in the US) are talking about science by press release. We are scared of talking about science plainly -
We don't want to communicate nuance.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)janterry
(4,429 posts)religion is just the old guard, I'm afraid